Motion for Classwide Preliminary Injunction
Summary
Named Plaintiffs United States Navy SEALs 1-3 and United States Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technician 1, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 for a preliminary injunction against enforcement of Defendants’ COVID-19 vaccine mandate in Case No. 4:21-cv-01236-O. The requested relief includes enjoining enforcement of the DoD COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate (an August 24, 2021 memorandum from Defendant Austin) and the Navy COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate (ALNAV 0622/21) against any member of the Navy Class and/or Subclasses. Named Plaintiffs also request a waiver of any bond, and the certificate of conference says Defendants are opposed to the relief requested. The signature block shows /s/ Heather Gebelin Hacker, dated the 7th day of February, 2022.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Date
- 2022-02-07
Cite this document
“Motion for Classwide Preliminary Injunction.”
Original at archive.org, dated 2022-02-07. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2022-02-07-plaintiffs-v-lloyd-j-austin-iii-in-his-official/
, SHA-256 87e0bd29cd02535d333d5c6f3947dfe211c8443bbccbb789e6fd9f64d2d48064.Full text
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION U.S. NAVY SEALs 1-3; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; U.S. NAVY EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL TECHNICIAN 1, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; U.S. NAVY SEALS 4-26; U.S. NAVY SPECIAL WARFARE COMBATANT CRAFT CREWMEN 1-5; and U.S. NAVY DIVERS 1-3, Plaintiffs, v. LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; CARLOS DEL TORO, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Navy, Defendants. Case No. 4:21-cv-01236-O MOTION FOR CLASSWIDE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Plaintiffs United States Navy SEALs 1-3 and United States Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technician 1 (“Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, by and through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, respectfully move this Court for a preliminary injunction against enforcement of Defendants’ COVID-19 vaccine mandate. In support of this Motion, Plaintiffs rely on the following: 1. The Brief in support of this Motion, filed contemporaneously herewith; 2. The Briefing, Appendices, and Supplemental Declarations in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 16, 17, 58, 59, 62, 63); Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 104 Filed 02/07/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID 3158 Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 104 Filed 02/07/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID 3158 2 3. The Testimony, Exhibits, and Evidence offered and admitted by Plaintiffs at the December 20, 2021 hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (See Dkt. 61, 101); 4. The First Amended Class Action Complaint (Dkt. 84); 5. The Briefing and Declarations in support of Named Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. 90 and forthcoming); and 6. All Evidence necessary to support this Motion, filed hereafter or presented at a hearing on this Motion or Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. Named Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court to grant the following relief: 1. A preliminary injunction enjoining Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons and entities in active concert or participation with them, directly or indirectly, from enforcing the DoD COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate (August 24, 2021 memorandum from Defendant Austin titled “Mandatory Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination of Department of Defense Service Members”), and the Navy COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate (ALNAV 0622/21), against any member of the Navy Class and/or Subclasses; and 2. A preliminary injunction enjoining Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons and entities in active concert or participation with them, directly or indirectly, from applying any policies, guidance, or memoranda implementing the DoD COVID- 19 Vaccine Mandate or the Navy COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate, to any member of the Navy Class and/or Subclasses. 3. A preliminary injunction enjoining Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons and entities in active concert or participation with them, directly or indirectly, from applying MANMED § 15-105(4)(n)(9), Trident Order #12, or any other policies, guidance, or memoranda implementing the DoD COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate or the Navy Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 104 Filed 02/07/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID 3159 Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 104 Filed 02/07/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID 3159 3 COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate, to any member of the Naval Special Warfare/Operations Subclass and/or the Navy SEALs Subclass. 4. A preliminary injunction enjoining Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons and entities in active concert or participation with them, directly or indirectly, from taking any adverse action against any member of the Navy Class, the Naval Special Warfare/Operations Subclass, and/or the Navy SEALs Subclass because of their requests for religious accommodation. Named Plaintiffs request a waiver of any bond required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) as these issues involve the free exercise of religion, there is no money at stake in issuance of the injunction, and no financial impact on the Defendants. See Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles Corp., 76 F.3d 624, 628 (5th Cir. 1996) (recognizing district courts have discretion to waive the bond requirement of Rule 65(c)); see also Gordon v. City of Hous., 79 F. Supp. 3d 676, 695 (S.D. Tex. 2015) (waiving Rule 65 bond in First Amendment lawsuit). WHEREFORE, the Named Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant this Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 104 Filed 02/07/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID 3160 Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 104 Filed 02/07/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID 3160 4 Respectfully submitted this 7th day of February, 2022. KELLY J. SHACKELFORD Texas Bar No. 18070950 JEFFREY C. MATEER Texas Bar No. 13185320 HIRAM S. SASSER, III Texas Bar No. 24039157 DAVID J. HACKER Texas Bar No. 24103323 MICHAEL D. BERRY Texas Bar No. 24085835 JUSTIN BUTTERFIELD Texas Bar No. 24062642 Danielle A. Runyan * New Jersey Bar No. 027232004 Holly M. Randall * Oklahoma Bar No. 34763 FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE 2001 W. Plano Pkwy., Ste. 1600 Plano, Texas 75075 Tel: (972) 941-4444 jmateer@firstliberty.org hsasser@firstliberty.org dhacker@firstliberty.org mberry@firstliberty.org jbutterfield@firstliberty.org drunyan@firstliberty.org hrandall@firstliberty.org JORDAN E. PRATT Florida Bar No. 100958* ** FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE 227 Pennsylvania Ave., SE Washington, DC 20003 Tel: (972) 941-4444 jpratt@firstliberty.org *Admitted pro hac vice ** Not yet admitted to the D.C. Bar, but admitted to practice law in Florida. Practicing law in D.C. pursuant to D.C. Court of Appeals Rule 49(c)(8) under the supervision of an attorney admitted to the D.C. Bar. /s/ Heather Gebelin Hacker HEATHER GEBELIN HACKER Texas Bar No. 24103325 ANDREW B. STEPHENS Texas Bar No. 24079396 HACKER STEPHENS LLP 108 Wild Basin Road South, Suite 250 Austin, Texas 78746 Tel.: (512) 399-3022 heather@hackerstephens.com andrew@hackerstephens.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 104 Filed 02/07/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID 3161 Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 104 Filed 02/07/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID 3161 5 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Plaintiffs’ counsel conferred with Defendants’ counsel on February 7, 2022. Defendants are opposed to the relief requested in this motion. /s/ Heather Gebelin Hacker HEATHER GEBELIN HACKER Counsel for Plaintiffs CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 7, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing document through the Court’s ECF system, which automatically notifies counsel of record for each party. /s/ Heather Gebelin Hacker HEATHER GEBELIN HACKER Counsel for Plaintiffs Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 104 Filed 02/07/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID 3162 Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 104 Filed 02/07/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID 3162
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.txnd.355696.104.0.pdf
- Size
- 179,246 bytes
- SHA-256
- 87e0bd29cd02535d333d5c6f3947dfe211c8443bbccbb789e6fd9f64d2d48064
- Original
- archive.org