Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Granting Chapter 7 Trustee'S Motion For An Order

Order Granting Chapter 7 Trustee'S Motion For An Order

Date
2021-06-22

Summary

An order filed June 24, 2021 as Doc 372 in In re Panthera Enterprises, LLC, BK No. 2:19-bk-00787, a Chapter 7 case in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, following a June 22, 2021 hearing. It grants Chapter 7 Trustee Aaron C. Amore's motion to sell the debtor's real property to Panthera Training, LLC for approximately $6.7 million under 11 U.S.C. § 363, and his motion to compromise an adversary proceeding and resolve objections. Citing McElroy Coal v. Dobbs, the court finds a right of first refusal in the original deed is a personal right, treats deed provisions 7 and 8 as rejected executory contracts, and overrules the remaining objection. It finds Panthera Training a good faith purchaser under 11 U.S.C. 363(m) and keeps the stay in place pending the WVEDA relief-from-stay hearing.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

No. 2:19-bk-00787    Doc 372   Filed 06/24/21   Entered 06/24/21 16:46:10   Page 1 of 8




               IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
             FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

In re:

PANTHERA ENTERPRISES, LLC,
                Debtor
                                                         BK No. 2:19-bk-00787
                                                         Chapter 7

  ORDER GRANTING CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER
   APPROVING THE SALE OF THE DEBTOR'S REAL PROPERTY AND
  NOVATING CERTAIN GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS FREE AND CLEAR
 OF LIENS, CLAIMS, INTERESTS, AND ENCUMBRANCES PURSUANT TO
                          11 U.S.C. § 363
                               And
  ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPROMISE/SETTLE ADVERSARY
  PROCEEDING AND RESOLVE PENDING OBJECTIONS TO TRUSTEE’S
   MOTION TO SELL REAL PROPERTY BY SMI, LLC, TR&L, LLC AND
                      AZADIAN GROUP, LLC


         On June 22, 2021, came Aaron C. Amore, Trustee, with a Motion for An

Order Approving the Sale of the Debtor's Real Property and Novating Certain

Government Contracts Free and Clear of Liens, Claims, Interests, and

Encumbrances Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 363 (ECF 304) ("Motion to Sell") and a

Motion to Compromise/Settle Adversary Proceeding and Resolve Pending Objections

to Trustee's Motion to Sell Real Property by SMI, LLC, TR&L, LLC and Azadian
No. 2:19-bk-00787      Doc 372   Filed 06/24/21   Entered 06/24/21 16:46:10   Page 2 of 8


Group, LLC (ECF 352) pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105, 541, 704, and Fed. R. Bankr.

P. 2002, and 9019 (“Motion to Compromise”). The motions were noticed and set for

hearing before the Court on the 22nd day of June 2021.

      Multiple objections were filed to the Motion to Sell, and a mediation was held

before the Honorable Keith L. Phillips prior to hearing. All objections were resolved

at mediation except for the objection filed by Rennick C. Williams, Betty P.

Williams and Robert Williams (hereafter collectively, the “Williams”) to both the

Motion to Sell and the Motion to Compromise.

      The Court has considered the evidence presented at hearing, the arguments

of counsel, the pleadings filed, and the record in this case, and based thereon,

makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

      1.      The Debtor's case was originally filed as a Chapter 11 case which was

           converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding on July 21, 2020. Upon conversion

           Aaron C. Amore (hereafter “Trustee”) was appointed as Chapter 7

           Trustee.

      2.      Panthera Training, LLC (hereafter “Panthera Training”) operates a

           training facility on the property owned by the Debtor under a long-term

           lease agreement. Panthera Training has been operating on the premises

           for an extended period of time and the lease provides for substantial

           cashflow.

      3.      On March 29, 2021, the Trustee filed his Motion to Sell pursuant to 11

           U.S.C 363(b)(1), proposing to sell to Panthera Training the Debtor’s real
No. 2:19-bk-00787    Doc 372   Filed 06/24/21   Entered 06/24/21 16:46:10    Page 3 of 8


           property for approximately $6.7 million based upon various sums Training

           agreed to pay at closing, some of which are additional sums Panthera

           Training agreed to pay to resolve the objections resolved at mediation.

      4.      The unresolved objection of the Williams involves a “right of first

           refusal” contained in the original deed and conveyance to the Debtor,

           along with a claimed right to compensation if the property is sold to a

           third party.

      5.      The issue before the Court is whether the provisions in the deed

           numbered 7 and 8 are covenants running with the land and binding on

           the Chapter 7 Trustee and subsequent purchasers or are they personal

           covenants taken in the form of an executory contract that was rejected by

           the Chapter 7 Trustee by operation of 11 U.S.C. § 365(b)(1) 60 days after

           the conversion of the bankruptcy case.

      6.      The preamble of the deed indicates all provisions of the deed that

           follow are covenants that run with the land, but that is not the end of the

           inquiry. In McElroy Coal v. Dobbs, 853 SE 2d 620 (2020), the West

           Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals observed that “rights of first refusal

           are presumed to be personal” and when the court confronts a right of first

           refusal servitude the court begins by assuming the benefit is personal, i.e.

           ”that it is not transferrable and does not run with the land.”

      7.      The Williams presented one witness at trial to rebut the presumption,

           Robert Williams, the son of Rennick and Betty Williams, who testified he
No. 2:19-bk-00787     Doc 372    Filed 06/24/21   Entered 06/24/21 16:46:10     Page 4 of 8


            was involved in the negotiations leading up to the closing of the family

            transaction with the Debtor. Mr. Williams explained why the right of first

            refusal was contained in the deed but had no adequate explanation why

            the right of first refusal was limited in its applicability to his parents and

            their surviving children. Other provisions in the deed's covenants section,

            such as convenant 4, refer to certain rights reserved to the Grantors, their

            successors in interest and assigns. The deed covenants numbered 7 and 8

            contain no such language. Notwithstanding the language in the

            preamble, the Court finds that the right of first refusal is a personal right

            and this finding has not been rebutted to the Court’s satisfaction.

      8.        The Court further finds that the provisions numbered 7 and 8 in the

            deed are executory contracts that were not assumed by the Chapter 7

            Trustee and are deemed rejected by operation of law.

      9.       The Court further finds that there were unperformed obligations on

            both sides of the right of first refusal that if they were not performed

            would create a material breach that would excuse the other's performance.

            The Court refers to In re Kellstrom Industries, Inc., 236 B.R. 833 (200), a

            Delaware case to illustrate the point.

      10.      The Court further observes that no party objected to the Trustee’s

            request that Panthera Training be found to be a good faith purchaser

            under the contract for sale and the Court so finds. The Court notes that

            Panthera Training was actively involved in the mediation and worked to
No. 2:19-bk-00787       Doc 372   Filed 06/24/21   Entered 06/24/21 16:46:10   Page 5 of 8


            resolve the objections in this case, all with the assistance of Judge

            Phillips. It has acted openly and diligently before the Court to move this

            sale forward in an expeditious manner.

      11.      The Court also finds that this motion has been pending since March

            20, 2021. The Williams have not taken any action to make an equal or

            better offer knowing of the pending motion. The sole action was to object

            to the sale. Also, in the original conveyance deed, the Williams expressly

            subordinated their right of first refusal to the WVEDA’s deed of trust,

            which all agree would be foreclosed out if the Court grants the pending

            motion for relief from stay filed by the WVEDA. The consequences of the

            Debtor’s primary asset being foreclosed out would have a detrimental

            consequences to the entire creditor body which will have a potential

            recovery from the sums to be paid to the bankruptcy estate by Panthera

            Training.

      12.      Based on all of these factors the Court finds that the Williams'

            objection to the Motion to Sell and to the Motion to Compromise should be

            overruled and the Motion to Sell should be granted approving the

            proposed sale.

Accordingly, it is

      ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the objection filed by Rennick C.

Williams, Betty P. Williams and Robert Williams to the Motion to Sell and to the

Motion to Compromise is hereby OVERRULED, and it is
No. 2:19-bk-00787   Doc 372    Filed 06/24/21   Entered 06/24/21 16:46:10   Page 6 of 8


       ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Motion to Sell is hereby GRANTED,

and it is

       ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Motion to Compromise is hereby

GRANTED, and it is.

       ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Panthera Training is deemed to be a

good faith purchaser pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 363(m).

       The Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear any disputes or issues related to

the proposed sale and the stay shall remain in place pending hearing on the motion

for relief from stay filed by WVEDA continued by this Court until July 22, 2021.

       The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Counsel for the Chapter 7

Trustee, Panthera Training LLC, West Virginia Economic Development Authority,

West Virginia Paving, Inc., TR&L, LLC and SMI, LLC, the Williams, the Debtor,

and any other party that has requested to receive notice in this case.

Prepared by:

/s/ Aaron C. Amore
Aaron C. Amore, Trustee
WVSB No. 6455
AMORE LQW, PLLC
206 West Liberty Street
Charles Town, WV 25414
T: (304) 885-4111
F: (866) 417-8796
aaron@amorelaw.com



Seen and Not Objected:

/s/ Debra Lee Allen
Debra Lee Allen, WVSB No. 9838
No. 2:19-bk-00787   Doc 372   Filed 06/24/21   Entered 06/24/21 16:46:10   Page 7 of 8


Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC
48 Donley Street, Suite 800
Morgantown, West Virginia 26507-0615
T: (304) 291-7920 | (304) 216-5835
F: (304) 291-7979
dallen@spilmanlaw.com
Counsel for West Virginia Economic
Development Authority

/s/ Douglas E. Kahle
Douglas E. Kahle, VSB # 15964
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
308 Cedar Lakes Drive, 2nd Floor
Chesapeake, VA 23322
T: (757) 547-9191
F: (757) 547-9135
DKahle@basnightkinser.com
Counsel for Panthera Training, LLC

/s/Zachary J. Rosencrance
Zachary J. Rosencrance (WV Bar No. 13040)
Bowles Rice LLP
zrosencrance@bowlesrice.com
600 Quarrier St |Charleston, WV 25301
Tel: (304) 347-1161
Fax: (304) 347-1756
Counsel for Panthera Training, LLC

/s/ Gary O. Kinder
Office of United States Trustee
300 Virginia St. East Room 2025
Charleston, WV 25301
Gary.O.Kinder@usdoj.gov
304-347-3406
Assistant United States Trustee




/s/Henry G. Swergold
Henry G. Swergold, ESQ.
Platzer, Swergold, Goldberg, Katz & Jaslow, LLP
475 Park Avenue South, 18th Floor
No. 2:19-bk-00787   Doc 372   Filed 06/24/21   Entered 06/24/21 16:46:10   Page 8 of 8


New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (212)593-3000 ext #228
Facsimile: (212) 593-0353
Email: hswergold@platzerlaw.com
Counsel for Azadian Group, LLC

/s/ Stephen L. Thompson
Stephen L. Thompson, Esq. (WVSB # 3751)
BARTH & THOMPSON
P.O. Box 129
Charleston, West Virginia 25321
Telephone: (304) 342-7111
Facsimile: (304) 342-6215
E-mail: sthompson@barth-thompson.com
Counsel for West Virginia Paving, Inc.

/s/ Norm Daniels
DANIELS LAW FIRM, PLLC
P. O. Box 1433
Charleston, West Virginia 25325
(304) 342-6666 Office
(304) 389-9999 Cell
normdaniels@danielslawfirm.com
Counsel for West Virginia Paving, Inc.

Refused to Agree to Order as it omitted findings related to Covenants 1 through 6.

James E. Smith II, Esquire WVSB 5447
122 East Street; P.O. Box 127
Keyser, West Virginia 26727
Attjes2esq@gmail.com
Counsel for Rennick Williams
Betty Williams & Robert Williams


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.wvnb.75953.372.0.pdf
Size
226,965 bytes
SHA-256
9bb3101d83885e35c6c3d2b4902e2dd37894980f835de3ea79f342a5c20a4d69
Our copy
gov.uscourts.wvnb.75953.372.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top