Court filing
Notice of Supplemental Authority (Travel Industry Letter) — Wall v. CDC (M.D. Fla., 2022-04-25)
Summary
Lucas Wall, the pro se plaintiff in Wall v. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (M.D. Fla., Case No. 6:21-cv-975-PGB), filed this notice of supplemental authority on 04/25/22 for the motion for summary judgment against defendants CDC and HHS (Doc. 230), on the arguments that the FTMM and the ITTR are arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion. The authority is an April 8, 2022 letter to White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha from Airlines for America, the American Hotel and Lodging Association, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the U.S. Travel Association. The letter asks the government to end pre-departure testing and the mask mandate for air travel. It cites $195.1 billion in international travel spending in the U.S. in 2019 and says such spending is still down 60% from 2019 levels.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed April 25, 2022 in Wall v. CDC; one of 48 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Orlando Division) |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-04-25 |
Cite this document
“Notice of Supplemental Authority (Travel Industry Letter) — Wall v. CDC (M.D. Fla., 2022-04-25).”
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Orlando Division), No. 6:21-cv-00975-PGB-DCI, Doc. 271, filed 2022-04-25. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/wall-v-cdc/2022-04-25-notice-supplemental-authority-travel-industry-letter-dkt-271/
, SHA-256 b5811ae907713c14668e989921f6aa765c63aa512874cdebafb9802fdfe5bd38.Full text
Case 6:21-cv-00975-PGB-DCI Document 271 Filed 04/25/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID 7660 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT @ FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA —_s=-- “ey ORLANDO DIVISION nc) we to 1 ~ ¢ vN ON C Plaintiff, : Case No. 6:21-cv-975-PGB-DE1 e v. : District Judge Paul Byron : CENTERS FOR DISEASE : Magistrate Judge Daniel Irick CONTROL & PREVENTION et al., Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY RE [230] MOTION FOR SJ: 4 MAJOR TRAVEL & BUSINESS GROUPS AGAIN DEMAND TERMINATION OF FITMM & ITTR COMES NOW plaintiff, pro se, pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(i), and asks the Court to please TAKE NOTICE of supplemental authority supporting my Motion for Sum- mary Judgment Against Defendants CDC & HHS on Counts 1-12 of the Amended Complaint. Doc. 230. 1. Citation: Letter from 4 Major Travel & Business Groups to The White House (April 8, 2022) 2. Specification by Page of the Issue or Argument in the Earlier Paper that the Authority Supplements: Doc. 230 at 14-21 (The FTMM is arbitrary, capri- cious, and an abuse of discretion); Id. at 33-35 (The ITTR is arbitrary, capri- cious, and an abuse of discretion). 3. “(Current public health trends require an updated approach for how health Case 6:21-cv-00975-PGB-DCI Document 271 Filed 04/25/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID 7661 measures should be applied to the travel industry. ... the high level of safety on-board a plane due to effective ventilation and HEPA air filters, all support the cessation of pre-departure testing and mask requirements for air travel.” 4. “Pre-departure testing is no longer an effective measure in protecting the United States from COVID-19. Today, the U.S. has a high level of immunity from vaccines, boosters, and infections. The BA.2 variant is currently the dominant strain of COVID-19 in the U.S. and public health data suggest this variant is less severe. While providing little health benefit, this requirement discourages travel by imposing an additional cost and the fear of being stranded overseas.” 5. “[S]ince the federal government does not require negative tests for entry at our land-border ports of entry with Canada and Mexico, it no longer makes sense to keep a pre-departure COVID-19 testing requirement in place for in- bound international air travelers to the U.S. The science clearly supports lift- ing the mask mandate...” 6. “While the public health benefits of these policies have greatly diminished, the economic costs associated with maintaining these measures are signifi- cant. ... Today, these measures are imposing significant costs on the traveling public, airline employees, and the American travel and tourism industries. We urge the federal government to eliminate these mandates, which will help America reach its full economic potential by helping industries hit hard by the pandemic to fully recover.” Case 6:21-cv-00975-PGB-DCI Document 271 Filed 04/25/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID 7662 Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of April 2022. Lucas Wall, plaintiff 3601 Cosmos Way The Villages, FL 32163 Telephone: 202-351-1735 E-Mail: Lucas.Wall@yahoo.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 22, I e-mailed this notice to defense counsel: Stephen Pezzi Stephen.Pezzi@usdoj.gov David Wood David.Wood@akerman.com Sally Culley sculley@rumberger.com Kuen fyb S— Lucas Wall, plaintiff Case 6:21-cv-00975-PGB-DCI Document 271 Filed 04/25/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID 7663 *AHLAll AMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIATION ofp «=U SS. TRAVEL ASSO CIATION* April 8, 2022 Dr. Ashish Jha Coronavirus Response Coordinator The White House Washington, DC 20500 Dear Dr. Jha: The travel industry has strongly supported federal policies necessary to combat COVID-19 and keep travel moving safely, including a vaccine requirement to restart international travel as well as pre-departure testing for entry into the United States and the federal mask mandate. However, current public health trends require an updated approach for how health measures should be applied to the travel industry. Hospitalizations and deaths have been falling since mid-January and new cases are stable. These facts, along with the immunity provided by vaccinations, boosters, and prior infections, as well as effective treatments and the high level of safety on-board a plane due to effective ventilation and HEPA air filters, all support the cessation of pre-departure testing and mask requirements for air travel. Pre-departure testing is no longer an effective measure in protecting the United States from COVID-19. Today, the U.S. has a high level of immunity from vaccines, boosters and infections. The BA.2 variant is currently the dominant strain of COVID-19 in the U.S. and public health data suggest this variant is less severe. While providing little health benefit, this requirement discourages travel by imposing an additional cost and the fear of being stranded overseas. For these reasons, many foreign governments, including those of Canada, the United Kingdom, and the European Commission, have eliminated this requirement for international air travel. Furthermore, since the federal government does not require negative tests for entry at our land- Case 6:21-cv-00975-PGB-DCI Document 271 Filed 04/25/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID 7664 Dr. Ashish Jha April 8, 2022 Page 2 border ports of entry with Canada and Mexico, it no longer makes sense to keep a pre- departure COVID-19 testing requirement in place for inbound international air travelers to the WIS} The science clearly supports lifting the mask mandate, particularly in the context of recent CDC guidance, which found that the overwhelming majority of the U.S. population no longer needs to wear masks indoors. Numerous studies and public health experts have demonstrated that planes are among the safest of indoor environments due to the superior ventilation and hospital grade air filters on commercial aircraft. Another critical factor is the widespread availability of effective masks that can be worn by anyone who wishes to do so. Finally, the burden of enforcing these requirements has fallen on airline employees for the past two years, oftentimes creating challenging situations with frustrated passengers. While the public health benefits of these policies have greatly diminished, the economic costs associated with maintaining these measures are significant. In 2019, the World Travel and Tourism Council found that total international travel spending in the U.S. was $195.1 billion, accounting for 16% of U.S. tourism sector spending. However, today, the most recent data on international travel from the U.S. Travel Association shows that spending on international travel is still down a staggering 60%, compared to 2019 levels. Simply put, the pre-departure testing requirement and the mask mandate no longer provide the public health benefits they once did. Today, these measures are imposing significant costs on the traveling public, airline employees, and the American travel and tourism industries. We urge the federal government to eliminate these mandates, which will help America reach its full economic potential by helping industries hit hard by the pandemic to fully recover. Sincerely, Airlines for America American Hotel and Lodging Association U.S. Chamber of Commerce U.S. Travel Association
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flmd.390847.271.0.pdf
- Size
- 743,022 bytes
- SHA-256
- b5811ae907713c14668e989921f6aa765c63aa512874cdebafb9802fdfe5bd38
- Original
- archive.org