Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Klaassen v. Trustees of Indiana University Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Klaassen v. Indiana University (N.D. Ind.)

Court filing

Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Klaassen v. Indiana University (N.D. Ind.)

Filed June 21, 2021 in Klaassen v. Trustees of Indiana University; one of 26 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Filed2021-06-21

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana · No. 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC · Doc. 7 · 2021-06-21 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

United States District Court
Northern District of Indiana
Ryan Klaassen, Jaime Carini, D.J.B., by and
though his next friend and father, Daniel G.
Baumgartner, Ashlee Morris, Seth Crowder,
Macey Policka, Margaret Roth, and Natalie
Sperazza,
Plaintiffs,
v.
The Trustees of Indiana University, 
Defendant.
Civ. No.    1:21-cv-238
 
Motion for Preliminary Injunction 
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, Plaintiffs Ryan Klaassen, Jaime Carini,
D.J.B., by and through his next friend and father, Daniel G. Baumgartner, Ashlee Morris, Seth
Crowder, Macey Policka, Margaret Roth, and Natalie Sperazza move for a preliminary injunction
to enjoin Defendant The Trustees of Indiana University from implementing or enforcing its
requirement for all Indiana University students to receive a COVID vaccine by either August 15
or when they return to a campus after August 1, whichever is earlier (“IU’s Mandate”). 
Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims. Plaintiffs’ fundamental
substantive due process rights of personal choice, bodily autonomy, medical privacy, and
religious convictions are at stake due to IU’s Mandate. IU’s Mandate violates the Fourteenth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution under the strict scrutiny analysis proper under Roman
Catholic Diocese, as well as under the Jacobson’s exception and modern rational basis review. 
Plaintiffs will also likely succeed on the merits of their state claim that IU’s Mandate
Mot. for Prelim. Inj.
1
USDC IN/ND case 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC   document 7   filed 06/21/21   page 1 of 4

violates the Vaccine Passport Law.  If a student doesn’t provide IU with his or her COVID
immunization status, IU virtually expels that student. Virtual expulsion from school for refusing
to provide COVID immunization status is a “negative consequence” that directly violates the
Vaccine Passport Law.
Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm if IU’s Mandate is not enjoined because they will
suffer loss of bodily autonomy, loss of an education at a first-class institution, loss of money
already invested in that education, loss of current and future earning potential, and loss of
medical privacy, to name but a few.  The balance of equities favors Plaintiffs because their
fundamental substantive due process rights outweigh IU’s minimal and speculative risk. 
The public certainly has had an important interest in controlling the COVID pandemic.
But under the current situation, if IU’s Mandate is not enjoined, the student’s now superior
interest in liberty will be lost. IU runs a very real risk of having a speculatively marginally
healthier population of students, but ones who have virtually no control over their own lives and
what they must inject into their bodies.  
This Motion is based on Plaintiff’s Preliminary Injunction Memorandum (attached to
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Memorandum in Excess of Page Limits, filed
concurrently), pleadings and papers on record herein, and any argument presented at the hearing
on this matter. 
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a), all Defendants have been issued
Notice of this Motion via certified mail and via email.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this Court grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary
Injunction enjoining Defendant from implementing or enforcing IU’s Mandate.
Mot. for Prelim. Inj.
2
USDC IN/ND case 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC   document 7   filed 06/21/21   page 2 of 4

Dated: June 21, 2021
Respectfully Submitted, 
/s/ James Bopp, Jr. 
James Bopp, Jr., Ind. Bar No. 2838-84
Richard E. Coleson, Ind. Bar No. 11527-70
Courtney Milbank, Ind. Bar No. 32178-29
Melena S. Siebert, Ind. Bar No. 35061-15
 THE BOPP LAW FIRM
1 South 6th Street
Terre Haute, Indiana 47807
Telephone: (812) 232-2434
Facsimile: (812) 235-3685
jboppjr@aol.com
rcoleson@bopplaw.com
cmilbank@bopplaw.com
msiebert@bopplaw.com
 Counsel for Plaintiffs
 
 
Mot. for Prelim. Inj.
3
USDC IN/ND case 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC   document 7   filed 06/21/21   page 3 of 4

Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the following
counsel of record in this matter on June 21, 2021, by U.S. First Class mail:
The Trustees of Indiana University
Franklin Hall 200
601 E. Kirkwood Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
/s/ James Bopp, Jr.                              
Mot. for Prelim. Inj.
4
USDC IN/ND case 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC   document 7   filed 06/21/21   page 4 of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.innd.107499.7.0.pdf
Size
196,771 bytes
SHA-256
eb8d1152738d1c67e5312d815536710ca54b60ce7e808a2bbe35fedb192f3b26
Our copy
gov.uscourts.innd.107499.7.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top