Court filing
Notice Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act as to Rashonda Golden — USA v. Sanders et al. (Dkt. 85)
Summary
Notice Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, dated March 13, 2024, Doc. 85 in United States of America v. Rashonda Golden and Jeffery Chillis, II, Case No. 24-00029-01/11-CR-W-BP, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The notice states that the Court confirms the United States' obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland and orders the United States to do so. It warns that failure to disclose in a timely manner may lead to exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, contempt proceedings or other sanctions. The signature block is Lajuana M. Counts, United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed March 13, 2024 in Sanders; one of 119 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court records for the Western District of Missouri and Western District of Washington |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-03-13 |
Cite this document
“Notice Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act as to Rashonda Golden — USA v. Sanders et al. (Dkt. 85).”
U.S. District Court records for the Western District of Missouri and Western District of Washington, No. 4:24-cr-00029-BP, Doc. 85, filed 2024-03-13. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-sanders-wdmo-4-24-cr-00029/2024-03-13-gov-uscourts-mowd-174450-85-0-doc-85/
, SHA-256 12d6ff823838e577e1ff91279a29aa53e74aba331ad1fd6acb1ef93c3b3c9ac8.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-00029-01/11-CR-W-BP ) RASHONDA GOLDEN (04), ) JEFFERY CHILLIS, II (07), ) ) Defendant(s). ) NOTICE PURSUANT TO THE DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS ACT Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States’ obligation to disclose to the defendant(s) all exculpatory evidence – that is, evidence that favors the defendant(s) or casts doubt on the United States’ case, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and ORDERS the United States to do so. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. DATE: March 13, 2024 /s/ Lajuana M. Counts LAJUANA M. COUNTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 4:24-cr-00029-BP Document 85 Filed 03/13/24 Page 1 of 1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mowd.174450.85.0.pdf
- Size
- 92,573 bytes
- SHA-256
- 12d6ff823838e577e1ff91279a29aa53e74aba331ad1fd6acb1ef93c3b3c9ac8
- Original
- PACER (login required)