Notice Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act as to Daisha Sanders — USA v. Sanders et al. (Dkt. 47)

Summary

Notice Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, dated February 29, 2024, Doc. 47 in United States of America v. Daisha Sanders et al., Case No. 24-00029-01/11-CR-W-BP, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The caption lists Daisha Sanders, Joel Wright, Denise Sanders, Kiandra Crowe, Shaquille Fielder, Alfred Hayes, and Luana McNurlin. The notice states that the Court confirms the United States' obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence as required by Brady v. Maryland and orders the United States to do so. It states that failure to disclose such evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including exclusion of evidence and dismissal of charges. It is signed /s/ Lajuana M. Counts, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 
WESTERN DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  
) 
 
)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiff, 
) 
 
) 
v. 
)   Case No. 24-00029-01/11-CR-W-BP 
)  
 
DAISHA SANDERS (01), 
 
 
) 
JOEL WRIGHT (02),  
 
 
) 
DENISE SANDERS (03), 
 
 
) 
KIANDRA CROWE (06), 
 
 
) 
SHAQUILLE FIELDER (08), 
 
) 
ALFRED HAYES (09), 
 
 
) 
LUANA MCNURLIN (10),  
 
) 
)  
 
 
 
Defendant(s). 
) 
  
 
 
NOTICE PURSUANT TO THE  
DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS ACT 
 
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States’ 
obligation to disclose to the defendant(s) all exculpatory evidence – that is, evidence that favors 
the defendant(s) or casts doubt on the United States’ case, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 
U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and ORDERS the United States to do so. Failure to disclose 
exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited 
to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, 
disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. 
 
DATE: February 29, 2024 
 
 
 /s/ Lajuana M. Counts 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LAJUANA M. COUNTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
 
 
Case 4:24-cr-00029-BP     Document 47     Filed 02/29/24     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.mowd.174450.47.0.pdf

Size

92,987 bytes

SHA-256

54c7c9a858a629c19ad95b47edcc605634e41dd3ff3caf24efcd62e30404afc0

Our copy

gov.uscourts.mowd.174450.47.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)