Court filing
Exhibit 3 - Geman Declaration — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 182.3)
Filed May 19, 2022 in Plaid Privacy; one of 174 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-05-19 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 182-3 · 2022-05-19 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
EXHIBIT 3
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 182-3 Filed 05/19/22 Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2416175.3
GEMAN DECL ISO MOT. FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,
EXPENSES, AND SERVICE AWARDS
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
BURNS CHAREST LLP
Christopher J. Cormier (Pro Hac Vice)
ccormier@burnscharest.com
4725 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20016
Tel: (202) 577-3977
Fax: (469) 444-5002
HERRERA KENNEDY LLP
Shawn M. Kennedy (SBN 218472)
skennedy@herrerakennedy.com
Bret D. Hembd (SBN 272826)
bhembd@herrerakennedy.com
4590 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 500
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Tel: (949) 936-0900
Fax: (855) 969-2050
HERRERA KENNEDY LLP
Nicomedes Sy Herrera (SBN 275332)
nherrera@herrerakennedy.com
Laura E. Seidl (SBN 269891)
lseidl@herrerakennedy.com
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: (510) 422-4700
Fax: (855) 969-2050
Co-Lead Class Counsel
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
Rachel Geman (Pro Hac Vice)
rgeman@lchb.com
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013-1413
Tel: (212) 355-9500
Fax: (212) 355-9592
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
Michael W. Sobol (SBN 194857)
msobol@lchb.com
Melissa Gardner (SBN 289096)
mgardner@lchb.com
Michael K. Sheen (SBN 288284)
msheen@lchb.com
Nicholas R. Hartmann (SBN 301049)
nhartmann@lchb.com
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Tel: (415) 956-1000
Fax: (415) 956-1008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
IN RE PLAID INC. PRIVACY
LITIGATION
Master Docket No.: 4:20-cv-03056-DMR
DECLARATION OF RACHEL GEMAN IN
SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,
REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, AND
PLAINTIFF SERVICE AWARDS, AND IN
RESPONSE TO COURT’S ORDER
(DKT. 177)
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
ALL ACTIONS
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 182-3 Filed 05/19/22 Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2416175.3
GEMAN DECL ISO MOT. FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,
EXPENSES, AND SERVICE AWARDS
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
I, Rachel Geman, hereby declare as follows:
1.
I am a member in good standing of the New York State Bar, and am admitted pro
hac vice in this matter to practice in the United Stated District Court for the Northern District of
California. I am a partner at the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP (“Lieff
Cabraser”), which was appointed Co-Lead Interim Class Counsel on July 29, 2020 (Dkt. 57) and
Co-Lead Class Counsel on November 19, 2021 (Dkt. 153). I am over 21 years of age and am not
a party to this action. I make this declaration based on my own personal knowledge. If called
upon to testify, I could and would testify competently to the truth of the matters stated herein.
2.
I submit this declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees,
Reimbursement of Expenses, and Plaintiff Service Awards (Dkt. 157) and, in particular, in
response to the Court’s request for specific supplemental information at the Final Approval
Hearing on May 12, 2022 (see Dkts. 177, 180). The Court directed Lieff Cabraser to submit
support for the hourly rates requested for Danna Elmasry. Dkt. 177 at 1.
3.
Danna Elmasry was employed as a summer law clerk at Lieff Cabraser, between
May 2021 and July 2021. She subsequently graduated with a Juris Doctor degree from the
University of Michigan Law School, in May 2022. During her time at Lieff Cabraser, Ms.
Elmasry performed legal research regarding settlement approval (including substantive and
procedural law), distribution of funds to cy pres recipients, and class notice. Ms. Elmasry
performed this work under the supervision and at the direction of my partner Melissa Gardner. In
total, Ms. Elmasry recorded 28.60 hours of work, at a rate of $370.00 per hour, for a total lodestar
of $10,582.00. See Dkt. 157-1 Ex. B.
4.
The hourly rates for law clerks at my firm, like Ms. Elmasry, are the usual and
customary rates set by the firm, based on periodic analysis of rates charged by firms performing
comparable work, and are the same as or comparable to the rates accepted by courts in other class
action litigation including courts in this District. See, e.g., In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach Litig.,
No. 15-MD-02617-LHK, 2018 WL 3960068, at *17 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2018) (approving hourly
rates for law clerks ranging from $270 to $345); In re Wells Fargo & Co. S’holder Derivative
Litig., No. 3:16-cv-05541-JST (June 27, 2019), Dkt. 278-7 Ex. 1 (summarizing hourly rates for
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 182-3 Filed 05/19/22 Page 3 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2416175.3
- 2 -
GEMAN DECL ISO MOT. FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,
EXPENSES, AND SERVICE AWARDS
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
two Lieff Cabraser law clerks, ranging from $375 to $395); In re Wells Fargo & Co. S’holder
Derivative Litig., 445 F. Supp. 3d 508, 527 (N.D. Cal. 2020) (approving hourly rates generally);
In re Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litig., No. 4:13-md-02420-YGR-DMR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 23,
2019), Dkt. 2487-5 Ex. 2 (summarizing hourly rates for three Lieff Cabraser law clerks, ranging
from $370 to $395); In re Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litig., No. 13-md-02420-YGR-DMR,
2020 WL 7264559, at *20 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2020) (approving attorneys’ fee request).
5.
By way of further context, Ms. Elmasry was one of several personnel, including
law clerks and paralegals, who performed a relatively limited amount of work on this litigation.
These individuals performed necessary but discrete tasks, such as the processing and maintenance
of documents produced and received in discovery, fact research, and legal research. After
conducting audits of Lieff Cabraser’s time records for this litigation, in the exercise of our
discretion, Lieff Cabraser categorically excluded time entered by timekeepers who recorded a de
minimis amount of time (i.e. less than ten hours). See Joint Decl. (Dkt. 157-1) ¶ 48.1
6.
If the Court were to exclude Ms. Elmasry from the firm’s lodestar submission (on
the basis that her work was similar in kind to that of, and only slightly more hours than, others
who had been excluded), Lieff Cabraser’s lodestar would be $1,286,059.00 for the time period
ending on January 25, 2022 (see Dkt. 157-1 Ex. B).
7.
Ms. Elmasry’s lodestar in this case is dwarfed by the work performed by Lieff
Cabraser in the period after January 25 and leading up to the final approval hearing. This work
primarily included preparing Plaintiffs’ motion for final approval of the Settlement, coordinating
with the notice and settlement administrator, responding to Class Member inquiries, preparing
written responses to Class Member objections to the Settlement, and preparing for and
participating in the Final Approval Hearing. Thus, Lieff Cabraser respectfully submits that
whether Ms. Elmasry’s time is considered by the Court for purposes of determining the
reasonableness of the attorneys’ fee request, the outcome is functionally the same.
1 The previously submitted Declaration, Dkt. 157-1, ¶¶ 61-71, Ex. B, as well as the concurrently
submitted Joint Declaration, address Lieff Cabraser’s internal review and auditing practices for
the time in this case, including which time is counted and how consistency is ensured.
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 182-3 Filed 05/19/22 Page 4 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2416175.3
- 3 -
GEMAN DECL ISO MOT. FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,
EXPENSES, AND SERVICE AWARDS
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct as to all matters of
which I have personal knowledge. Executed this 19th day of May, 2022, in New York, New
York.
/s/ Rachel Geman
Rachel Geman
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 182-3 Filed 05/19/22 Page 5 of 5File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.359040.182.3.pdf
- Size
- 34,130 bytes
- SHA-256
- f94619ed4aac1a998afff54b24d9b13a0faa31918ea67fff8d0e8fec6b6deec7
- Original
- PACER (login required)