Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (PAED 589575) Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority filed by Kolawole Ahmadou — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 53, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337)

Court filing

Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority filed by Kolawole Ahmadou — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 53, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337)

Filed December 1, 2022 in Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC; one of 344 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Filed2022-12-01

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania · No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG · Doc. 53 · 2022-12-01 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 
 
ALICIA MARSHALL, DANIEL 
PRONSKY, PARIS TOWNSEND, 
NANCILEE HOLLAND, LEONA 
OWSLEY, KOLAWOLE AHMADOU, 
KIANA DERVIN, KRISTINA 
HENDERSON, DUSTIN INNIS, KELLY 
STALNAKER and JAMIE JONES, 
individually and on behalf of all others 
similarly situated, 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs, 
 
 
 
v. 
 
PRESTAMOS CDFI, LLC and CHICANOS 
POR LA CAUSA, INC., 
 
 
 
 
Defendants. 
 
 
 
Civil Action No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY 
Plaintiffs Alicia Marshall, Daniel Pronsky, Paris Townsend, Nancilee Holland, Leona 
Owsley, Kolawole Ahmadou, Kiana Dervin, Kristina Henderson, Dustin Innis, Kelly Stalnaker 
and Jamie Jones (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly 
situated, respectfully request leave to submit the attached Supplemental Authority regarding 
Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 46. Plaintiffs have submitted opposition to 
Defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF No. 49) and Defendants have also submitted a reply (ECF 
No. 51). The Supplemental Authority consists of a recently issued Congressional Report and an 
associated Press Release, both of which are described in greater detail below. 
On December 1, 2022, the U.S. House of Representatives’ Select Subcommittee on the 
Coronavirus Crisis released a Staff Report entitled “‘We Are Not The Fraud Police’: How 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 53     Filed 12/14/22     Page 1 of 5

2 
 
Fintechs Facilitated Fraud in the Paycheck Protection Program” (the “Select Subcommittee 
Report”). See Select Subcommittee Report, available at 
https://coronavirus.house.gov/sites/democrats.coronavirus.house.gov/files/2022.12.01%20How%
20Fintechs%20Facilitated%20Fraud%20in%20the%20Paycheck%20Protection%20Program_0.p
df (last visited Dec. 9, 2022). The Select Subcommittee obtained information from defendant 
Prestamos CDFI, LLC (“Prestamos”) in preparing the Select Subcommittee Report. See Select 
Subcommittee Report at 17. See Vanderklok v. United States, 868 F.3d 189, 205 n.16 (3d Cir. 
2017) (“It is appropriate to take judicial notice of ... information ... made publicly available by 
government entities[.]”) (quoting Daniels-Hall v. Nat'l Educ. Ass'n, 629 F.3d 992, 998 (9th Cir. 
2010)).  
The Select Subcommittee Report’s findings regarding defendant Prestamos include, but 
are not limited to, the following: 
a. 
Prestamos approved the highest number of PPP loans of any PPP lender in 2021, 
approving nearly half a million loans. See Select Subcommittee Report at 20 at 
Figure 1, n. 119. 
b. 
“In a briefing with Select Subcommittee staff, Prestamos’ President 
acknowledged that [Prestamos] was ‘not prepared for all the applications we 
received’ during the PPP and said that the nonprofit knowingly took on a role 
larger than it had been prepared to handle because they saw a limited number of 
PPP funds going to underserved communities and believed that Blueacorn could 
help them serve those communities without compromising program requirements 
....’” Id. at 44-45. 
c. 
Prestamos paid Blueacorn $700 million in PPP loan processing fees. Id. at 2. 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 53     Filed 12/14/22     Page 2 of 5

3 
 
d. 
“In 2021, Blueacorn was involved in the processing of nearly all of the loans 
facilitated by the top two PPP lenders that year by loan volume – Capital Plus and 
Prestamos.” Id. at 20.   
e. 
“Blueacorn’s ownership directed reviewers to prioritize ‘monster loans [that] 
will get everyone paid’ and created an exclusive category of PPP loans, called 
‘VIPPP’ loans. Blueacorn’s ownership directed loan reviewers ‘to prioritize and 
submit large [’VIPPP’] loans without following protocols that [loan reviewers] 
had been trained to complete.’ While prioritizing ’VIPPP’ loans, Blueacorn’s 
owners were dismissive of other loans, writing ‘delete them,’ ‘who fucking 
cares,’ and ‘[w]e’re not the first bank to decline [PPP] borrowers who 
deserve to be funded … they go elsehwere [sic].’” Id. at 3 (emphasis in 
original). 
On December 8, 2022, in response to the Select Subcommittee Report, the U.S. Small 
Business Administration (the “SBA”) issued a press release announcing that “[t]he House Select 
Subcommittee report details serious problems of fraud and self-dealing by lenders” and that the 
SBA has “launched a full investigation” of Prestamos and other lenders “to ensure that federal 
financial regulators have a coordinated response to wrongdoing by lenders.” See U.S. Small 
Business Administration Statement on the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis 
Report Concerning Fraud in the Paycheck Protection Program, Release No. 22-98 (Dec. 8, 
2022), available at https://www.sba.gov/article/2022/dec/08/us-small-business-administration-
statement-house-select-subcommittee-coronavirus-crisis-report (last visited Dec. 9, 2022).   
Attached as Exhibit 1 is the Select Subcommittee Report.  Attached as Exhibit 2 is the 
SBA’s December 8, 2022 Press Release. 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 53     Filed 12/14/22     Page 3 of 5

4 
 
Conclusion 
For the foregoing reasons, the Court should grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File 
Supplemental Authority.  
Dated:  December 14, 2022 
BAILEY & GLASSER LLP 
 
By: /s/ Lawrence J. Lederer 
 
Lawrence J. Lederer (Pa. ID 50445) 
Michael L. Murphy (admitted pro hac vice)  
Bart D. Cohen (Pa. ID 57606) 
1055 Thomas Jefferson Street NW, Suite 540 
Washington, DC 20007 
T.: 202.463-2101 
F.: 202.463-2103 
llederer@baileyglasser.com 
mmurphy@baileyglasser.com  
bcohen@baileyglasser.com  
 
 
 
and 
 
NOLAN HELLER KAUFFMAN LLP 
Justin A. Heller (admitted pro hac vice) 
Matthew M. Zapala (admitted pro hac vice)  
80 State Street, 11th Floor 
Albany, NY 12207 
T.: 518.449.3300 
F.: 518.432.3123 
jheller@nhkllp.com  
mzapala@nhkllp.com 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class and 
Subclasses 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 53     Filed 12/14/22     Page 4 of 5

 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that on December 14, 2022 I caused Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File 
Supplemental Authority to be filed on the Court’s CM/ECF system and for service of same on all 
counsel of record. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Lawrence J. Lederer 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lawrence J. Lederer 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 53     Filed 12/14/22     Page 5 of 5

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.paed.589575.53.0.pdf
Size
84,640 bytes
SHA-256
f4caf5b6287fd8b3ea3282d5ba09b9eff03147c26716550757c1d8f7997211ef
Our copy
gov.uscourts.paed.589575.53.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top