Court filing
Stipulation and Order of 4/14/23 that the Time for Prestamos — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 60, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337)
Summary
A stipulation and proposed order extending defendants' time to respond to the second amended complaint, filed 04/14/23 as Document 60 in Marshall, et al. v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC and Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., Case No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG, Eastern District of Pennsylvania. It recites that on March 30, 2023 the court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion to dismiss and allowed limited jurisdictional discovery before Chicanos Por La Causa may renew its personal-jurisdiction challenge. The parties agree Prestamos will answer by Thursday, April 27, 2023, and that Chicanos Por La Causa need not answer until its renewed motion is decided, with plaintiffs getting at least 21 days to respond.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed March 30, 2023 in Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC; one of 373 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2023-03-30 |
Cite this document
“Stipulation and Order of 4/14/23 that the Time for Prestamos — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 60, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337).”
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG, Doc. 60, filed 2023-03-30. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-marshall-prestamos-paed-589575/2023-03-30-gov-uscourts-paed-589575-60-0-gov-uscourts-paed-589575-60-0/
, SHA-256 1691aef1a65b673d3620fae2afa44225e0463217e01978d1d87ac0f33089bca1.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALICIA MARSHALL, DANIEL PRONSKY, PARIS TOWNSEND, NANCILEE HOLLAND, LEONA OWSLEY, KOLAWOLE AHMADOU, KIANA DERVIN, KRISTINA HENDERSON, DUSTIN INNIS, KELLY STALNAKER and JAMIE JONES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PRESTAMOS CDFI, LLC and CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA, INC., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WHEREAS, the Court Granted in Part and Denied in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on March 30, 2023 (ECF Nos. 56 and 57); WHEREAS, the Court denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as to Defendant CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA, INC. (“CPLC”) for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2) without prejudice and subject to limited jurisdictional discovery on the Court’s personal jurisdiction over CPLC; WHEREAS, Defendant CPLC is permitted to renew its motion to dismiss after limited jurisdictional discovery, which the Court ordered shall take place pursuant to the terms of its March 30, 2023 Order (ECF No. 57); Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG Document 60 Filed 04/14/23 Page 1 of 3 2 WHEREAS, without extension, and pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Prestamos CDFI LLC’s (“Prestamos”) answer to the SAC would be due on April 13, 2023; WHEREAS, no Scheduling Order has been entered in this matter and therefore the extension requested will not affect the timing of summary judgment motions or trial; IT IS hereby STIPULATED and AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel that: 1. The time for Prestamos to answer the SAC shall be extended until Thursday, April 27, 2023. 2. CPLC shall not be required to answer the SAC pending decision on its renewed motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, which will be filed after limited jurisdictional discovery and in accordance with a schedule decided by the Court after the parties file their submissions regarding limited jurisdictional discovery. Plaintiffs shall be allowed no less than 21 days to respond to CPLC’s renewed motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG Document 60 Filed 04/14/23 Page 2 of 3 3 BAILEY & GLASSER LLP By: /s/ Lawrence J. Lederer Lawrence J. Lederer (Pa. ID 50445) Bart D. Cohen (Pa. ID 57606) 1622 Locust Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 T.: 202-463-2101 F.: 202-463-2103 llederer@baileyglasser.com bcohen@baileyglasser.com BAILEY & GLASSER LLP Michael L. Murphy (pro hac vice) 1055 Thomas Jefferson Street NW, Suite 540 Washington, DC 20007 T.: 202-463-2101 F.: 202-463-2103 mmurphy@baileyglasser.com NOLAN HELLER KAUFFMAN LLP Justin A. Heller (pro hac vice) Matthew M. Zapala (pro hac vice) 80 State Street, 11th Floor Albany, NY 12207 T: 518-449-3300 F.: 518-432.3123 jheller@nhkllp.com mzapala@nhkllp.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class Dated: April 13, 2023 BALLARD SPAHR LLP By: /s/ Marcel S. Pratt Marcel S. Pratt (Pa. ID 307483 ) 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 T: 215-665-8500 F: 215-864-8999 PrattM@ballardspahr.com HERRERA ARELLANO LLP Roy Herrera* Daniel A. Arellano* Jillian Andrews* 530 East McDowell Road, Suite 107-150 Phoenix, AZ 85004 T: 602-567-4820 Roy@ha-firm.com Daniel@ha-firm.com Jillian@ha-firm.com *pro hac vice admission to be sought Attorneys for Defendants Dated: April 13, 2023 IT IS SO ORDERED. April __, 2023 HON. JOHN M. GALLAGHER, United States District Judge 14 /s/ John M. Gallagher Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG Document 60 Filed 04/14/23 Page 3 of 3
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.paed.589575.60.0.pdf
- Size
- 57,477 bytes
- SHA-256
- 1691aef1a65b673d3620fae2afa44225e0463217e01978d1d87ac0f33089bca1
- Original
- PACER (login required)