Court filing
Motion for Release Pending Appeal as to Kisha Sutton — United States v. Sutton et al. (Dkt. 417, S.D. W. Va.)
Summary
Defendant's Motion for Release Pending Appeal, United States v. Kisha Sutton, Case No. 2:24-cr–00192-01, S.D. W. Va., Document 417, filed 11/24/25. Counsel Connor Robertson asks that Sutton remain free from incarceration pending appeal, noting a conviction for aiding and abetting bank fraud and aiding and abetting money laundering. The motion cites the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR), a Total Offense Level of 19, Criminal History Category I and a guideline range of 30-37 months, and says Sutton is asking for a below-guideline sentence without incarceration. Under 18 U.S.C. §3143(b), the motion argues Sutton poses no danger, the appeal is not for delay, and substantial questions include venue in the Southern District of West Virginia and whether the Government proved a financial institution.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed November 24, 2025 in United States v. Sutton et al.; one of 235 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2025-11-24 |
Cite this document
“Motion for Release Pending Appeal as to Kisha Sutton — United States v. Sutton et al. (Dkt. 417, S.D. W. Va.).”
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, No. 2:24-cr-00192, Doc. 417, filed 2025-11-24. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-kisha-sutton-wvsd-240497/2025-11-24-gov-uscourts-wvsd-240497-417-0-doc-417/
, SHA-256 551ffb9110baeb78484f2bb9225b6a4a1a0951e92d45934253ebe2e223d7028c.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, V. CASE NO.: 2:24-cr–00192-01 KISHA SUTTON, DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING APPEAL NOW COMES the Defendant, Kisha Sutton, by and through her counsel, Connor Robertson, and moves the Court toallowhertoremainfreefromincarcerationpending her appeal. Given Ms. Sutton’s conduct on pre-trial and post-trial release thus far, the Court should be comfortable knowing she will abide by any conditions. CONVICTION AND GUIDELINE CALCULATION As the Court is aware, Ms. Sutton stands convicted of aidingandabettingbank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§1344 and 2, and of aiding and abetting money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) and (2). As indicated in the Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”), dated November 17, 2025, the Total Offense LevelforMs.Suttonis19.SeePSR⁋87.Ms.Sutton’sTotalCriminalHistoryScoreplaces herinCategoryIasazeropointoffender.Id. Thus,Ms.Sutton’scorrespondingsentencing guideline range, as calculated by probation, is 30-37 months. Ms. Sutton is asking fora below the guideline sentence that doesn’t include incarceration; however, should the Court decide otherwise, Ms. Sutton requests to remain free from incarceration pending appeal. Release pending appeal is governed by 18 U.S.C. §3143(b) which allows for a defendant to remain free on bail pending appeal ifthejudicialofficerfindsbyclearand convincing evidencethatthepersonisnotlikelytofleeorposeadangertothesafetyof any other personorthecommunityifreleased;andtheappealisnotforthepurposeof delay and raises substantial questions of laworfactlikelytoresultinreversal,anorder fornewtrial,asentencethatdoesnotincludeimprisonment,orreducedsentencetermof Case 2:24-cr-00192 Document 417 Filed 11/24/25 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 2761 imprisonment less than the total time already served plus the expected duration fo the appeal process. First, there is no question that Ms. Sutton poses no threat to any person or the community should she remain free on bail. Second, Ms. Sutton’s appeal is not being pursuedtodelaythismatter,insteaditistopursuechallengesthatMs.Suttonlodgedfrom thebeginningofhercase.Finally,Ms.Suttonbelievesthattherearesubstantialquestions offactandlawconcerninghisconvictionwhichwouldleadtoareversalofhisconviction. AstheCourtisaware,Ms.SuttonmovedtodismisstheIndictmentarguingthatvenuewas not proper in the SouthernDistrictofWestVirginia.Ms.Suttonwenttotrialtopreserve her venue argument for appeal. Obviously, thisCourtdecidedotherwise.Regardless,Ms. Sutton maintains her belief that venuewasimproperwhichnowneedstobedecidedby appeal. Additionally, theGovernmentfailedtomeetitsburdenofproofastoprovingMs. Sutton knew she was defrauding a “financial institution” as defined by law. CONCLUSION Forthereasonsstated,andiftheCourtdeterminesaprisonsentenceisnecessary, Ms.Suttonrespectfullyrequestsbailpendingappealgiventhathersentencelengthwould likely be similar to the time it would take to pursue the appeal process. Respectfully submitted, Kisha Sutton By counsel, s://Connor Robertson Connor Robertson (WVSB 11460) ROBERTSON LAW PLLC 2702 Main Street Hurricane, WV 25526 (304) 557-1601 cdr@croblaw.com Case 2:24-cr-00192 Document 417 Filed 11/24/25 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 2762 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, V. CASE NO.: 2:24-cr–00192-01 KISHA SUTTON, DEFENDANT. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I,ConnorD.Robertson,doherebycertifythatonthis24thdayofNovember,2025, I electronically filed the foregoing “DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING APPEAL” with the court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the below counsel of record addressed to: Jonathan Storage Assistant United States Attorney Jonathan.Storage@usdoj.gov s://Connor Robertson Connor Robertson (WVSB 11460) ROBERTSON LAW PLLC 2702 Main Street Hurricane, WV 25526 (304) 557-1601 cdr@croblaw.com Case 2:24-cr-00192 Document 417 Filed 11/24/25 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 2763
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.wvsd.240497.417.0.pdf
- Size
- 105,205 bytes
- SHA-256
- 551ffb9110baeb78484f2bb9225b6a4a1a0951e92d45934253ebe2e223d7028c
- Original
- PACER (login required)