Court filing
Motion to Reconsider re: 225 Order Regarding New Trial — United States v. Sutton et al. (Dkt. 237, S.D. W. Va.)
Filed June 4, 2025 in United States v. Sutton et al.; one of 133 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2025-06-04 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia · No. 2:24-cr-00192 · Doc. 237 · 2025-06-04 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 2:24-cr-00192 KISHA SUTTON - 01, Defendant. DEFENDANT KISHA SUTTON’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDER (225) REGARDING NEW TRIAL DATE AND JURY SELECTION DATE NOW COMES the Defendant, Kisha Sutton, by and through counsel, Connor Robertson, and respectfully asks the Court to reconsider the newly selected Trial Date (July14)andpotentialJurySelectiondate(July11),asundersignedcounselhasmultiple schedulingconflicts,bothpersonalandprofessional,whichcannotberearranged.Forthe reasons set forth below, undersigned counsel is respectfully asking the Courttoconsult withcounselinordertoscheduleatrialdateandjuryselectiondatewhereallpartiescan ensure availability. In the alternative, undersigned counsel will need to request a withdrawalascounselforDefendantSutton,soastoensureshehascounselavailableto defendherinterest.Undersignedcounselhasplentyofopenavailabilityfortrialandjury selectionincloseproximitytothealreadyproposedtrialdateofJuly14thand,therefore, is not asking for any extended period of time and any delaywillbeminimal.Insupport thereof, the Defendant states as follows: Case 2:24-cr-00192 Document 237 Filed 06/04/25 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1220 1. ThetrialofKishaSuttonandShamiseWrightwasmostrecentlyscheduledforJune 9, 2025. 2. Counsel for Shamise Wright requested a continuance on the grounds that additionaltimewasneededtoreviewvoluminousdiscoveryandforattorney-client consultation prior to trial. (ECF 209). 3. Undersignedcounsel,onbehalfofKishaSutton,didnotjoininDefendantWright’s Motion to Continue, but did not object to the Court granting the same. However, Defendant Sutton was ready and prepared for Trial on June 9, 2025.1 4. On Monday, June 2, 2025, the Court Granted Defendant Wright’s Motion to Continue and rescheduled TrialforJuly14,2025.(ECF225).IntheCourt’sOrder, theCourtinstructedcounseltobepreparedforJurySelectiononoraboutJune11, 2025 (the Friday prior to Trial). 5. Upon reviewing the Court’s Order (ECF 225),severalschedulingconflictsbecame apparent: a. First and foremost, undersigned counsel will be out of the State of West Virginia on pre-arranged, pre-paid, and non-refundable familymatterJune 27th throughJuly13,2025.Thus,itisimpossiblethatundersignedcounsel will be available for Jury Selection on or about July 11,2025.Additionally, dependingontravelmishaps,itisentirelypossiblethatundersignedcounsel would be unavailable for the start of trial on June 14, 2025. Undersigned counselprioritizesfamilytimeveryfewtimesperyearcomparedtokeeping 1 As an additional matter, it isimportantfortheCourttoknowthattheGovernmentand Defendant Sutton have both proposed resolutions to thiscasewhichwouldalleviatethe need for trial, but so far, neither proposal is acceptable to theotherparty.Undersigned counsel would anticipate further discussions to be had. Case 2:24-cr-00192 Document 237 Filed 06/04/25 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 1221 abusylawpractice;therefore,undersignedcounselwouldasktheCourtto withdrawal as counsel should the Court find rescheduling animpossibility. Counsel is notwillingtorevealdetailsofthisschedulingontherecord,but will happily disclose the same to the Court directly if necessary. b. Secondly, it is less than ideal for a criminal defendant to have counsel returning from a lengthy trip the night before trial begins. Although undersignedcounselwillbepreparedtogoforwardifabsolutelynecessary, as he wasfortheJune9thtrialdate,undersignedcounselcanenvisionthe ineffective claim should the trial not turn out favoribly. c. Lastly,counselhascourtappearancespreviouslyscheduledduringtheweek oftrialthatwouldnecessitatecounseltofileaNoticeofSchedulingConflict pursuant to LR Civ. P. 83.12. i. State of West Virginia v. Thomas Ochoa, Case No. 25-M40M-910, Putnam County Magistrate Court, scheduled on July 16, 2024 at 11:00 a.m.; ii. StateofWestVirginiav.Patricia&GregoryLaughlin,CaseNo.:25-F-22 & 25-F-23, Calhoun County Circuit Court, scheduled for Motions Arguments on July 17, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. 6. Undersigned counsel has plenty of Trial availability in the weeks following the presently scheduled trial week of July 14th - July 18, 2025. Undersigned counsel can block off the following weeks for Trial: a. July 21, 2025 - July 25, 2025 - Counsel can also be available for Jury Selection - the Friday before July 21, 2025 which is July 18th; Case 2:24-cr-00192 Document 237 Filed 06/04/25 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 1222 b. July 28, 2025 - August 1, 2025 - Counsel can also be available for Jury Selection on July 25, 2025 - the Friday before July 25, 2025; c. August 4, 2025 - August 8, 2025 - Counsel can also be available for Jury Selection on August 1, 2025 - the Friday before August 4, 2025. d. August 11, 2025 - August15,2025-CounselcanalsobeavailableforJury Selection on August 8, 2025 - the Friday before August 11, 2025. e. August 18, 2025 - August 22nd - Counsel can also be available for Jury Selection on August 15, 2025 - the Friday before August 18, 2025. 7. DefendantSutton,DefendantWright,northeGovernmentwillbeprejudicedbythis rescheduling. Both defendants are out on bond with no bond violations. The Government is not prejudiced as this Motion is being filed with plenty of timeto reschedule witnesses. WHEREFORE, Defendant Sutton, by and through counsel respectfully asks this Court: 1. to Reconsider the Trial date scheduled in the most recent Order Granting Defendant Wright’s Motion toContinuetoadatewhereallcounselcaneffectively participate; 2. promptlyconferwithallremainingcounselpriortosettingthenewdatetoensure availability as undersigned counsel maintains a busy practice; 3. inthealternative,grantundersignedcounsel’sMotiontoWithdrawascounseland appoint Defendant Sutton new counsel to be available for trial. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, By counsel, Case 2:24-cr-00192 Document 237 Filed 06/04/25 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 1223 s:// Connor D. Robertson Connor Robertson (11460) ROBERTSON LAW PLLC 2702 Main Street Hurricane, WV 25526 (304) 557-1601 cdr@croblaw.com Case 2:24-cr-00192 Document 237 Filed 06/04/25 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 1224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, V. CASE NO.: 2:24-CR-000192-01 KISHA SUTTON, DEFENDANT. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Connor Robertson, certify that on the 4th day of June, 2025, a copy of the foregoing motion was served on theUnitedStatesbyECF,toJonathanStorage,Assistant United States Attorney to the following: Jonathan Storage Assistant United States Attorney Jonathan.Storage@usdoj.gov s:// Connor D. Robertson Connor Robertson (11460) ROBERTSON LAW PLLC 2702 Main Street Hurricane, WV 25526 (304) 557-1601 cdr@croblaw.com Case 2:24-cr-00192 Document 237 Filed 06/04/25 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 1225
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.wvsd.240497.237.0.pdf
- Size
- 110,031 bytes
- SHA-256
- 2f68be889e5ad7e6d2fc8c4b6cfa13e81d6a853cca45cf555c3b92c51337c7da
- Original
- PACER (login required)