Order re Speedy Trial Act — USA v. Gauthier (Dkt. 36)

Summary

An Order in United States of America v. Heath Gauthier, Criminal No. 23-cr-15-JL-TSM, Doc. 36 in Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM, U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, dated 1/30/2024 over the name of United States District Judge Joseph N. Laplante. It directs counsel to jointly file, within seven days, a stipulation setting forth the applicable periods of elapsed time and excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq. The stipulation must state how many days remain on the Speedy Trial Clock, and the order says the first or last line should state that number as of the scheduled trial date. The order adds that a simple chart will suffice and that any periods of excludable delay need citations supporting the exclusion.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 
 
United States of America 
 
 
v. 
 
 
Criminal No.  23-cr-15-JL-TSM 
 
Heath Gauthier 
 
 O R D E R 
 
 
Within seven days from the date of this order, counsel shall jointly file a stipulation setting forth 
the applicable periods of (a) elapsed time and (b) excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 
3161, et seq: 
 
• 
as of the final date of any currently pending period of excludable delay (if applicable); 
 
 
• 
if possible, as of the currently scheduled trial date. 
 
 
This filing shall state how many days remain on the Speedy Trial Clock.  Counsel may include as 
much (or as little) explanatory material as they wish, but the first and/or last line of the stipulation should 
clearly state the number of days remaining on the Speedy Trial Clock as of the scheduled trial date. 
    
The stipulation need not contain long narratives or explanations.  Even a simple chart will 
suffice.  It need only specify OR list any periods of excludable delay, accompanied by statutory or 
case citations supporting the exclusion.   
 
If the parties are in disagreement as to any of these periods of elapsed time or excludable delay, 
the joint filing shall present their respective positions in parallel columns. 
 
 
SO ORDERED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                             
 
 
 
 
____________________________ 
 
 
 
 
Joseph N. Laplante 
 
 
 
 
United States District Judge 
 
Dated:   1/30/2024 
 
cc: 
Kasey A. Weiland, AUSA 
 
Dorothy E. Graham, Esq. 
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM     Document 36     Filed 01/30/24     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.nhd.60810.36.0.pdf

Size

134,309 bytes

SHA-256

00efddc37ef3ce72beb49eafa6feae5b4ac6746df5b84164dcc782cb33754345

Our copy

gov.uscourts.nhd.60810.36.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)