ORDER re Speedy Trial Act as to Heath Gauthier — USA v. Gauthier (Dkt. 30)

Record facts

D.N.H. · No. 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM · Doc. 30 · 2023-09-06 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An order regarding the Speedy Trial Act in United States of America v. Heath Gauthier, Criminal No. 23-cr-15-JL-TSM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, dated September 6, 2023 and filed as Document 30. The order directs counsel to jointly file, within seven days, a stipulation setting out elapsed time and excludable time under 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq, as of the end of any pending excludable delay and, if possible, as of the scheduled trial date. The stipulation must state how many days remain on the Speedy Trial Clock and list any periods of excludable delay with supporting citations; a simple chart will suffice. If the parties disagree, the joint filing is to present their positions in parallel columns. The one-page order is signed by United States District Judge Joseph N. Laplante.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 
 
United States of America 
 
 
v. 
 
 
Criminal No.  23-cr-15-JL-TSM 
 
Heath Gauthier 
 
 O R D E R 
 
 
Within seven days from the date of this order, counsel shall jointly file a stipulation setting forth 
the applicable periods of (a) elapsed time and (b) excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 
3161, et seq: 
 
• 
as of the final date of any currently pending period of excludable delay (if applicable); 
 
 
• 
if possible, as of the currently scheduled trial date. 
 
 
This filing shall state how many days remain on the Speedy Trial Clock.  Counsel may include as 
much (or as little) explanatory material as they wish, but the first and/or last line of the stipulation should 
clearly state the number of days remaining on the Speedy Trial Clock as of the scheduled trial date. 
    
The stipulation need not contain long narratives or explanations.  Even a simple chart will 
suffice.  It need only specify OR list any periods of excludable delay, accompanied by statutory or 
case citations supporting the exclusion.   
 
If the parties are in disagreement as to any of these periods of elapsed time or excludable delay, 
the joint filing shall present their respective positions in parallel columns. 
 
 
SO ORDERED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                             
 
 
 
 
____________________________ 
 
 
 
 
Joseph N. Laplante 
 
 
 
 
United States District Judge 
 
Dated:  9/6/2023 
 
cc: 
Matthew Hunter, AUSA 
 
Dorothy E. Graham, Esq. 
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM     Document 30     Filed 09/06/23     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.nhd.60810.30.0.pdf

Size

133,745 bytes

SHA-256

2f2c42dce863cbce2add3043f64e5c1c922d505e4c0da4c1399e9079ab8256d9

Our copy

gov.uscourts.nhd.60810.30.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)