Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Crowther United States v. Casey David Crowther — M.D. Fla., No. 2:20-cr-114-JES-MRM Motion for Leave to File Document by Casey David Crowther — USA v. Crowther (Dkt. 80, M.D. Fla. No. 2:20-mj-01094, docketed in No. 2:20-cr-00114)

Court filing

Motion for Leave to File Document by Casey David Crowther — USA v. Crowther (Dkt. 80, M.D. Fla. No. 2:20-mj-01094, docketed in No. 2:20-cr-00114)

Filed March 12, 2021 in USA v. Crowther; one of 318 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Filed2021-03-12

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida · No. 2:20-cr-00114 · Doc. 80 · 2021-03-12 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
FORT MYERS DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
Criminal No. 2:S20-cr-114-FTM-66MRM 
 
CASEY DAVID CROWTHER  
 
 
 
Defendant. 
_____________________________/ 
 
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL  
PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 3.01 
MOTION REGARDING TRIAL PROCEEDINGS 
 
 
Defendant, Casey D. Crowther (“Crowther”), through undersigned counsel, 
and pursuant to M.D. Local Rule 3.01, hereby files his Motion for Leave to File Under 
Seal Motion for Bench Trial or Alternatively to Seal Certain Proceedings or to 
Bifurcate Trial.1 
I. 
INTRODUCTION 
Crowther requests this Court’s leave to file a sealed Motion for Bench Trial or 
Alternatively to Seal Certain Proceedings or to Bifurcate Trial. There are certain 
proceedings and trial procedures that need to be addressed with the Court in private 
 
1  
This Court’s local rules do not specify the Court’s procedure for seeking 
leave to file under seal in a criminal case.  For this reason, the undersigned contacted 
the clerk’s office for guidance and was advised that the procedure is substantially 
similar to the procedure for seeking leave to file under seal in civil cases under M.D. 
Local Rule 1.11. 
 
The proposed duration of the request to file Crowther’s forthcoming 
motion under seal is through the close of the upcoming trial, including the verdict.   
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M     Document 80     Filed 03/12/21     Page 1 of 5 PageID 314

2 
 
in order to preserve Crowther’s constitutional rights, specifically his right to a fair trial 
pursuant to the Sixth Amendment.  Crowther’s forthcoming motion addresses certain 
sensitive information that could cause harm to the jury pool.  As this Court is aware, 
this criminal case has received significant publicity and news media attention.  The 
information contained in Crowther’s forthcoming motion therefore should not be filed 
in the public domain.   
Accordingly, Crowther requests that his forthcoming Motion for Bench Trial or 
Alternatively to Seal Certain Proceedings or to Bifurcate Trial be sealed. 
II. 
MEMORANDUM OF LAW 
There are certain matters regarding the upcoming trial that need to be addressed 
with the Court in a private setting.  Due to the media coverage associated with this 
case, this sensitive information should be addressed with the Court in private to avoid 
any harm to the jury pool.   
In United States v. Cooper, 679 Fed. Appx. 738 (11th Cir. 2017), the Eleventh 
Circuit discussed the criteria for sealing proceedings in a criminal action.  The 
Eleventh Circuit stated: 
The public has a qualified First Amendment right of 
access to criminal trial proceedings. See United States v. 
Ochoa-Vasquez, 428 F.3d 1015, 1028-29 (11th Cir. 
2005). This right establishes a presumption of openness that 
precludes 
the sealing of criminal proceedings. See id. at 
1030. To overcome this presumption, a party must show "an 
overriding interest based on findings that closure is essential to 
preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that 
interest." Id. (quoting Press-Enterprise Co. v. Super. Ct. of 
California, 464 U.S. 501, 510, 104 S. Ct. 819, 78 L. Ed. 2d 
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M     Document 80     Filed 03/12/21     Page 2 of 5 PageID 315

3 
 
629 
(1984)). A 
district 
court, 
addressing 
the sealing of criminal proceedings, 
has 
"discretion 
to 
determine which portions of the record should be placed 
under seal." Perez-Guerrero v. United States AG, 717 F.3d 
1224, 1235 (11th Cir. 2013). In denying a party's access to 
documents or sealing proceedings, however, a district court 
"must articulate the overriding interest 'along with findings 
specific enough that a reviewing court can determine 
whether the closure order was properly entered.'" Ochoa-
Vasquez, 428 F.3d at 1030 (quoting Press-Enterprise Co., 464 
U.S. at 510). 
 
Cooper, 679 Fed. Appx. at 742.   
Suffice to say, Crowther’s right to a fair trial constitutes an overriding interest 
to the presumption of openness that normally attaches to criminal proceedings.  The 
sensitive information that should be addressed with the Court in a private setting may 
impact the jury pool and thus cause harm to Crowther’s Constitutional rights. The 
duration of the request of sealing the forthcoming motion will last not more than thirty 
days and may actually be able to be unsealed within fourteen days or less. 
Accordingly, Crowther requests that his forthcoming motion regarding the 
upcoming trial and trial procedures be sealed. 
III. 
CONCLUSION 
Based on the foregoing, Defendant, Casey David Crowther respectfully requests 
that this Court (a) grant this Motion in all respects; (b) grant Crowther leave to seal his 
forthcoming Motion for Bench Trial or Alternatively to Seal Certain Proceedings or 
to Bifurcate Trial; and (c) enter such other and further relief this Court deems just and 
proper.   
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M     Document 80     Filed 03/12/21     Page 3 of 5 PageID 316

4 
 
 
 
IV. 
CERTIFICATION 
Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Criminal Scheduling Order [D.E. 40], the 
undersigned certifies the following:  
i. moving counsel has conferred with opposing counsel;  
ii. counsel has not resolved the motion by agreement; and  
iii. the motion concerns a matter not covered by this Order.  
 
Respectfully Submitted,  
/s/ Nicole H. Waid____ 
Nicole H. Waid, Esq.  
Florida Bar No. 0121720 
nicole.waid@fisherbroyles.com 
 
/s/ Brian E. Dickerson 
Brian E. Dickerson, Esq. 
Fla. Bar No. 106615 
brian.dickerson@fisherbroyles.com 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FISHERBROYLES, LLP  
                                
 
 
 
2390 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 100  
                                
 
 
 
Naples, Florida 34103  
                                
 
 
 
Phone: (202) 906-9572  
                                
 
 
 
Fax: (239) 236-1360  
                               
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M     Document 80     Filed 03/12/21     Page 4 of 5 PageID 317

5 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
I, Nicole H. Waid, attorney for Casey David Crowther, do hereby certify that I 
have, this day, filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court via the CM/ECF system, 
which has caused a true and correct copy to be served on all counsel of record.  
/s/ Nicole H. Waid____ 
Nicole H. Waid, Esq.  
 
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M     Document 80     Filed 03/12/21     Page 5 of 5 PageID 318

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flmd.381779.80.0.pdf
Size
177,578 bytes
SHA-256
0b7ab0cb1a9c99392c19ecb47911603d354629452565b71499fb27679b5e1e0b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flmd.381779.80.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top