Proposed verdict form filed by USA as to Casey David Crowther — USA v. Crowther (Dkt. 85, M.D. Fla. No. 2:20-mj-01094, docketed in No. 2:20-cr-00114)

Summary

The government's proposed Special Verdict for Forfeiture, filed 03/15/21 as Document 85 in United States v. Casey David Crowther, Case No. 2:20-cr-114-JES-MRM in the Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division. If the jury found Crowther guilty of Counts One, Two, Four, Five and/or Six of the Second Superseding Indictment, it would decide whether listed assets were proceeds of the bank fraud schemes or false statements, or property involved in the money laundering offense. The assets are a 2020 40' Invincible Catamaran registered to and owned by Crowther, and his interest in approximately $630,482.37 received from the sale of real property.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
FORT MYERS DIVISION 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
v. 
 
 
Case No. 2:20-cr-114-JES-MRM 
 
 
CASEY DAVID CROWTHER 
 
SPECIAL VERDICT FOR FORFEITURE 
Having found the defendant Casey Crowther guilty of Counts One, Two, 
Four, Five and/or Six of the Second Superseding Indictment, determine whether the 
assets listed below (1) represent property constituting, or derived from, proceeds 
obtained, directly or indirectly, from the bank fraud schemes, (2) represent property 
constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from making 
a false statement to a lending institution, and/or (3) constitute property involved in 
the money laundering offense, or is property traceable to such property. 
We, the Jury, find that: 
1. 
A 2020 40’ Invincible Catamaran, Hull ID# IVBC0076D920, 
registered to and owned by the defendant: 
 
(a) 
Represents property constituting, or derived from, proceeds 
obtained, directly or indirectly, from the bank fraud scheme 
charged in Count One: 
 
 
 
 
Yes                        
 
No                  
 
 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M     Document 85     Filed 03/15/21     Page 1 of 2 PageID 351

2 
 
(b) 
Represents property constituting, or derived from, proceeds 
obtained, directly or indirectly, from making a false statement to 
a lending institution charged in Count Two: 
 
Yes                        
 
No                  
 
(c) 
Constitutes property involved in the money laundering offense 
charged in Count Four, or is property traceable to such property: 
 
 
 
Yes                        
 
No                  
 
 
 
2. 
The defendant’s interest in approximately $630,482.37 received from 
the sale of the real property located at 3653 San Carlos Drive, Saint 
James City, Florida 33956: 
 
(a) 
Represents property constituting, or derived from, proceeds 
obtained, directly or indirectly, from the bank fraud scheme 
charged in Count Five: 
 
 
 
 
Yes                        
 
No                  
  
(b) 
Represents property constituting, or derived from, proceeds 
obtained, directly or indirectly, from making a false statement to 
a lending institution charged in Count Six: 
 
Yes                        
 
No                  
 
 
 
 
SO SAY WE ALL: 
 
 
                                  
 
                     
FOREPERSON 
 
DATE 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M     Document 85     Filed 03/15/21     Page 2 of 2 PageID 352

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flmd.381779.85.0.pdf

Size

69,247 bytes

SHA-256

a5d51c31518101058cd0d4c2587c89ebb1bb5b6c8cdf35fe8bdcf8fda1ee0536

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flmd.381779.85.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)