Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Thomas et al USA v. Thomas et al — Carla Jackson judgment, N.D. Ga. Motion to Adopt Codefendant Teldrin Foster's Response in Opposition by Carla Jackson — USA v. Thomas et al. (Dkt. 916, N.D. Ga.)

Court filing

Motion to Adopt Codefendant Teldrin Foster's Response in Opposition by Carla Jackson — USA v. Thomas et al. (Dkt. 916, N.D. Ga.)

Filed February 11, 2024 in USA v. Thomas et al.; one of 81 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2024-02-11

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS · Doc. 916 · 2024-02-11 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES                               ) 
 
 
                                                             )   
 
             v.                                             )         
                                                              )     
INDICTMENT NO. 
 
CARLA JACKSON, 
 
 
)     
1:20-CR-00296-JPB-CMS-05 
 
 
 
Defendant  
) 
 
______________________________ ) 
 
 
MOTION TO ADOPT CODEFENDANT TELDRIN FOSTER’S 
“RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION” [DOC. NO. 914] 
 
 
Comes now, Defendant Carla Jackson, by and through undersigned 
counsel, and hereby moves this Court to adopt codefendant Teldrin Foster’s 
“Response in Opposition” (Doc. No. 914). In support, Ms. Jackson shows 
the following.  
Mr. Foster’s Response in Opposition (“Response”) (Doc. No. 914) is 
filed in opposition to the “United States Motion to Admit Evidence of Co-
Defendant Guilty Pleas” (hereafter “Motion”) (Doc. No. 912). In its Motion, 
the Government seeks to introduce evidence of other co-defendants’ guilty 
pleas by arguing that Mr. Foster opened the door to introduction of such 
evidence during his cross-examination of Government witnesses. 
Regarding Defendant Jackson, the Government asserts that the 
mention by Ms. Jackson trial counsel during opening statements that the 
Government’s investigation was “sloppy” and that two parties in this case – 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 916     Filed 02/11/24     Page 1 of 4

 
2
codefendants Darrell Thomas and John Gaines – had entered guilty pleas in 
the case, somehow opens the door for the Government to elicit during 
examination the fact that other codefendants’ entered guilty pleas.1  
First, Defendant Jackson’s opening statement reference to a “sloppy” 
Government investigation made no reference at all to the issue of whether 
other codefendants had entered guilty pleas or not. It addressed the fact of a 
pleading error in the Government’s Second Superseding Indictment 
regarding count 46 and that this drafting error started at the case’s inception 
and went through three separate charging documents (Indictment, First 
Superseding Indictment, and Second Superseding Indictment). This is no 
basis to grant the Government’s Motion. 
Second, counsel for Ms. Jackson did mention that codefendant Darrell 
Thomas and John Gaines had entered guilty pleas in this case, but that was 
stated for two reasons: Defendant Jackson intends to call codefendant John 
Gaines in her case-in-chief to testify on her behalf, and the fact of his guilty 
plea will be discussed with Mr. Gaines during questioning. Also, Ms. 
Jackson’s defense counsel mentioned Darrell Thomas’ guilty plea during the 
opening statement because the Government referenced Mr. Thomas 
 
1 For the above reasons, Ms. Jackson has the same standing to bring that 
motion filed by Mr. Foster, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 
“A.” 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 916     Filed 02/11/24     Page 2 of 4

 
3
specifically during its list of parties that it read out to the jury during voir 
dire. Defendant Jackson assumed that Mr. Thomas could be called in as a 
witness for the Government as he played a primary role in the Government’s 
investigation and charging decisions. 
 
WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above, the Court should 
GRANT Defendant’s Motion to Adopt, consider the additional arguments 
set forth above, and DENY the Government’s Motion. 
 
Respectfully submitted this 11th day of February, 2024. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  David D. Marshall 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
David D. Marshall 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Attorney for Defendant 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Georgia Bar No. 471517 
 
2550 Sandy Plains Road 
Suite 225 PMB 349 
Marietta, Georgia 30066 
(404) 213-1358 (phone) 
ddmarshall98@gmail.com 
 
 
 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 916     Filed 02/11/24     Page 3 of 4

 
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES                               ) 
 
 
                                                             )   
 
             v.                                             )         
                                                              )     
INDICTMENT NO. 
 
CARLA JACKSON, 
 
 
)     
1:20-CR-00296-JPB-CMS-05 
 
 
 
Defendant  
) 
 
______________________________ ) 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
 
This is to certify that the foregoing was formatted in 14-point Times 
Roman, in accordance with Local Rule 5.1C, and was electronically filed 
this day with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will 
automatically send email notification of such filing to the following: 
All defense counsel; All AUSA’s of record 
 
This 11th day of February, 2024. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  David D. Marshall 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
David D. Marshall 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Attorney for Defendant 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Georgia Bar No. 471517 
2550 Sandy Plains Road 
Suite 225 PMB 349 
Marietta, Georgia 30066 
(404) 213-1358 (phone) 
ddmarshall98@gmail.com 
 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 916     Filed 02/11/24     Page 4 of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.279867.916.0.pdf
Size
142,529 bytes
SHA-256
698befdd33c40ec8543d4ceb4eb1663bcd29cae92d8923e3e5d10c3a460ced2a
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.279867.916.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top