Court filing

ORDER of USCA as to 223 USCA Case Number (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 228)

Summary

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied Thomson Reuters Corporation's petition for permission to appeal under Rule 23(f) in Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, No. 23-80070, from D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Northern District of California, San Francisco, by an Order filed November 17, 2023 before Circuit Judges Christen and Thomas. The same order granted the motion for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in support of the petition (Docket Entry No. 9) and the motion for leave to file a reply (Docket Entry No. 11), cited Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952, and was docketed in the district court as Document 228 on 11/17/23.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed November 17, 2023 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation; one of 443 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed	2023-11-17

Cite this document

“ORDER of USCA as to 223 USCA Case Number (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 228).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 228, filed 2023-11-17. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2023-11-17-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-228-0-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-228-0/, SHA-256 5a9f7420ca8c213835d6b658d12bc881ed7ee7befe2a4959e65ce67ca8a1c405.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

OSA111  
  
  
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 
 
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 
 
CAT BROOKS; RASHEED SHABAZZ, 
individually and on behalf of all others 
similarly situated.,  
 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs-Respondents,  
 
  v.  
 
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,  
 
 
 
 
 
Defendant-Petitioner. 
No. 
23-80070  
 
D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC  
Northern District of California,  
San Francisco  
 
ORDER 
 
Before:  CHRISTEN and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 
 
 
The motion for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in support of the petition 
(Docket Entry No. 9) is granted.  
 
The motion for leave to file a reply (Docket Entry No. 11) is granted.  The 
reply has been filed.  
 
The petition for permission to appeal is denied.  See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); 
Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952, 959-60 (9th Cir. 2005) (describing 
factors this court considers in analyzing a Rule 23(f) petition).  
FILED 
 
NOV 17 2023 
 
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK 
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 
Case: 23-80070, 11/17/2023, ID: 12825641, DktEntry: 13, Page 1 of 1
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 228     Filed 11/17/23     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.cand.374304.228.0.pdf
Size: 144,598 bytes
SHA-256: 5a9f7420ca8c213835d6b658d12bc881ed7ee7befe2a4959e65ce67ca8a1c405
Our copy: gov.uscourts.cand.374304.228.0.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)