Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation ORDER of USCA as to 223 USCA Case Number (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed… — Brooks v. Thomson…

Court filing

ORDER of USCA as to 223 USCA Case Number (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 228)

Filed November 17, 2023 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation; one of 127 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2023-11-17

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 228 · 2023-11-17 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

OSA111  
  
  
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 
 
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 
 
CAT BROOKS; RASHEED SHABAZZ, 
individually and on behalf of all others 
similarly situated.,  
 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs-Respondents,  
 
  v.  
 
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,  
 
 
 
 
 
Defendant-Petitioner. 
No. 
23-80070  
 
D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC  
Northern District of California,  
San Francisco  
 
ORDER 
 
Before:  CHRISTEN and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 
 
 
The motion for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in support of the petition 
(Docket Entry No. 9) is granted.  
 
The motion for leave to file a reply (Docket Entry No. 11) is granted.  The 
reply has been filed.  
 
The petition for permission to appeal is denied.  See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); 
Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952, 959-60 (9th Cir. 2005) (describing 
factors this court considers in analyzing a Rule 23(f) petition).  
FILED 
 
NOV 17 2023 
 
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK 
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 
Case: 23-80070, 11/17/2023, ID: 12825641, DktEntry: 13, Page 1 of 1
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 228     Filed 11/17/23     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.228.0.pdf
Size
144,598 bytes
SHA-256
5a9f7420ca8c213835d6b658d12bc881ed7ee7befe2a4959e65ce67ca8a1c405
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.228.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top