Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Edward M Chen:… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 226)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 226 · 2023-09-19 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

Civil minutes of a status conference held September 19, 2023 before Judge Edward M. Chen in Brooks et al v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, filed as Document 226. The minutes list Andre Mura and Karina Puttieva for plaintiffs and Susan Fahringer for defendant. They state that the parties were awaiting the Ninth Circuit's decision on Defendants' Rule 23(f) petition to appeal the order granting class certification, and that the Court accepted the parties' proposed schedule. The Court set a 7–10-day jury trial to start October 14, 2025 and directed the parties to discuss ADR. The case was continued to January 9, 2024 at 2:30 PM for a status conference, with a joint status report due by January 2, 2024.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

OFFICE OF THE CLERK 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
Northern District of California 
 
CIVIL MINUTES 
 
Date: September 19, 2023 
Time: 2:43-2:50 
           7 Minutes 
 
Judge: EDWARD M. CHEN 
Case No.: 21-CV-01418-EMC  
Case Name:  Brooks et al v. Thomson Reuters Corporation 
 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiff: Andre Mura and Karina Puttieva 
Attorney for Defendant: Susan Fahringer 
 
Deputy Clerk: Vicky Ayala 
 
Court Reporter:  Irene Rodriguez 
 
PROCEEDINGS 
Status Conference - held  
 
SUMMARY 
Parties stated appearances.  
Parties are still awaiting the Ninth Circuit’s decision on Defendants’ Rule 23(f) petition for 
permission to appeal the Court’s order granting class certification.   
The Court accepted parties’ proposed schedule.  Both parties say the complexity of the case and 
working with expert witnesses’ schedules require this longer timeline.  
Plaintiff notes their UCL claim may require a bench trial but in light of potential claim for 
damages, the Court will schedule a 7–10-day jury trial with an October 14, 2025 start date.  
Further status conference set for 01/09/2023 at 2:30PM.  This date may be accelerated if the 
Ninth Circuit rules on the 23(f) petition before then.  The Court directed parties to discuss ADR 
in advance of the next conference.    
CASE CONTINUED TO: January 9, 2024, at 2:30 PM for a Status Conference.  Joint status 
report due by 1/2/2024. 
 
  
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 226     Filed 09/19/23     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.226.0.pdf

Size

117,166 bytes

SHA-256

5d8facb0fc2b8d3a65a8cbca523d484ab587d2efbd08da8eb39e9211e3cb715a

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.226.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)