Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation Order by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 85 Motion — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 86, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418)

Court filing

Order by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 85 Motion — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 86, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418)

Filed April 22, 2022 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation; one of 127 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2022-04-22

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 86 · 2022-04-22 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
, 
Plaintiff(s), 
v. 
, 
Defendant(s). 
Case No. 
APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 
ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 
(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 
I,  
, an active member in good standing of the bar of 
, hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac 
vice in the Northern District of California representing: 
 in the 
above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is 
, an 
attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 
within the State of California.  Local co-counsel’s bar number is: _________________. 
MY ADDRESS OF RECORD 
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD 
MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD 
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD 
MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD 
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD 
I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 
another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is:  
. 
A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document 
from said bar is attached to this application. 
I have been granted pro hac vice admission by the Court _______ times in the 12 months 
preceding this application. 
3:21-cv-01418
David Siffert
New York
Plaintiffs
Andre Mura
111 Third Ave., Apt. 4E, NY, NY 10003
505 14th St., Ste. 1110, Oakland, CA 94612
(646) 645-5337
(510) 350-9700 
david@stopspying.org
amm@classlawgroup.com
4823514
CAT BROOKS, et al.,
THOMSON REUTERS CORP
0
298541
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 86     Filed 04/22/22     Page 1 of 2

Updated 11/2021
2 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially 
the Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local 
Rules.  I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 
Dated:  
APPLICANT 
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 
FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of  
 is 
granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney 
must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-
counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 
Dated:  
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
David Siffert
April 21, 2022
David Siffert
April 22, 2022
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 86     Filed 04/22/22     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.86.0.pdf
Size
122,293 bytes
SHA-256
ff4945a1a555cf0d2585e89589aebf398228e703b39f893f543cf49408cbe638
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.86.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top