Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Discovery purposes — Brooks v. Thomson Reu…

Court filing

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Discovery purposes — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 96)

Summary

Document 96, filed June 27, 2022 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 21-cv-01418-EMC (N.D. Cal.), is a one-page Order of Reference to Magistrate Judge for Discovery signed by United States District Judge Edward M. Chen. Under Civil Local Rule 72-1, discovery disputes and all further discovery, including Docket No. 95, are referred for random assignment to a United States Magistrate Judge, with that box checked. Any hearing date on discovery motions on the undersigned's calendar is vacated. After meeting and conferring, the parties are to prepare a short joint letter explaining the dispute, with limited attachments, and the assigned Magistrate Judge will advise how to proceed.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Discovery purposes — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 96).” Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 96. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2022-06-27-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-96-0-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-96-0/, SHA-256 a1cf751aa932f21167941fad1018bfa045801908dd3551e0f455ef8e428c3540.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

                                        Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC              Document 96       Filed 06/27/22      Page 1 of 1




                                   1                                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                                   2                                    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

                                   3

                                   4     CAT BROOKS, et al.,                                 Case No. 21-cv-01418-EMC
                                                          Plaintiffs,
                                   5
                                                                                             ORDER OF REFERENCE TO
                                                    v.                                       MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR
                                   6
                                                                                             DISCOVERY
                                   7     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
                                                          Defendant.
                                   8

                                   9            Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, discovery disputes and all further discovery including

                                  10   Docket No. 95 in this case are referred

                                  11                     ☒ for random assignment to a United States Magistrate Judge.

                                  12                     ☐ to United States Magistrate Judge.



 United States District Court
                                  13   Any date for hearing on discovery motions previously noticed on the undersigned's calendar is

                                  14   VACATED.

                                  15            After meeting and conferring, the parties shall prepare a joint letter of not more than 5



Northern District of California
                                  16   pages explaining the dispute. Up to 12 pages of attachments may be added. The joint letter must

                                  17   be electronically filed under the Civil Events category of "Motions and Related Filings >Motions--

                                  18   General > Discovery Letter Brief." The Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will

                                  19   advise the parties of how that Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling,

                                  20   order more formal briefing, or set a telephone conference or a hearing. After a Magistrate Judge

                                  21   has been assigned, all further discovery matters shall be filed pursuant to that Judge's procedures.

                                  22            IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                  23   Dated: June 27, 2022

                                  24                                                     ______________________________________
                                                                                         EDWARD M. CHEN
                                  25                                                     United States District Judge
                                  26

                                  27

                                  28
                                       Rev. 10-18


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.96.0.pdf
Size
146,019 bytes
SHA-256
a1cf751aa932f21167941fad1018bfa045801908dd3551e0f455ef8e428c3540
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.96.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top