Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation Order by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 79 Motion — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 80, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418)

Court filing

Order by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 79 Motion — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 80, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418)

Filed March 16, 2022 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation; one of 127 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2022-03-16

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 80 · 2022-03-16 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 80     Filed 03/16/22     Page 1 of 2

Updated 11/2021
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially 
the Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local 
Rules. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated:
APPLICANT
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of 
is
granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney 
must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-
counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.
Dated:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
March 16, 2022
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 80     Filed 03/16/22     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.80.0.pdf
Size
404,526 bytes
SHA-256
5c116911970d61126cd6df3010126944c1b3ca1fa135daba6cd38d141419e922
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.80.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top