Proposed Order — Benworth Oto (Dkt. 26.1)

Summary

Filed August 26, 2024 as Document 26-1 in Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO (N.D. Cal.), this is a [Proposed] Order Granting Respondent's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed in Benworth Capital Partners LLC v. Oto Analytics, LLC, before Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín. The proposed order would provisionally file under seal the Opposition to Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration Award, in part, and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Alexander L. Cheney, in full, until the Court decides whether they stay sealed. For both, it lists Petitioner Benworth as the party with the burden to substantiate sealing. The stated reason is material that Petitioner has claimed or may claim is confidential.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER 
WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO
 
 
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP
Alexander L. Cheney (SBN 302157) 
acheney@willkie.com 
333 Bush Street 
San Francisco, CA 94104 
(415) 858-7400 
 
Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice) 
slombardi@willkie.com 
787 7th Avenue 
New York, NY 10019 
(212) 728-8000 
 
Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) 
jlevy@willkie.com 
1875 K Street, N.W. 
Washington, DC 20006-1238 
(202) 303-1000 
 
Attorneys for Respondent 
Oto Analytics, LLC 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS 
LLC, 
Petitioner, 
v. 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC, 
Respondent. 
Case No. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER 
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL 
SHOULD BE SEALED 
Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 26-1     Filed 08/26/24     Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER 
WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO
 
Upon consideration of Respondent’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another 
Party’s Material Should Be Sealed, it is hereby ORDERED that the following documents are filed 
under seal provisionally until the Court makes a determination of whether the material shall remain 
under seal: 
Document 
title or 
description
Dkt. No. 
of 
redacted 
version 
Dkt. No. of 
unredacted
version 
Dkt. No. 
of decl. 
in 
support 
of 
sealing 
Party with 
burden to 
substantiate
need to seal 
Full or 
partial 
sealing 
sought 
Brief 
statement 
of 
reason for 
sealing 
 
Granted/ 
Denied 
 
 
Opposition 
to Petition 
to Vacate 
Final 
Arbitration 
Award 
25 
26-2 
 
Petitioner, 
Benworth 
Partial, 
Page 
12, 
Lines 
8–12. 
Material 
that 
Petitioner 
has claimed 
or may 
claim is 
confidential
 
Exhibit 2 to 
Declaration 
of 
Alexander 
L. Cheney 
25-4 
26-3 
 
Petitioner, 
Benworth 
Full 
Material 
that 
Petitioner 
has claimed 
or may 
claim is 
confidential
 
 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
DATED: ________________  
 
_____________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Honorable Araceli Martínez-Olguín 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States District Judge 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 26-1     Filed 08/26/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.433897.26.1.pdf

Size

301,338 bytes

SHA-256

e2b17ed1694aa8374e73d9d5b2a0a4d4dc60ed7cc1ad48e8dd8b4604225695d6

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.433897.26.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)