Court filing
Proposed Order — Benworth Oto (Dkt. 26.1)
Filed August 26, 2024 in Benworth Oto; one of 100 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-08-26 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:24-cv-04840-AMO · Doc. 26-1 · 2024-08-26 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED CASE NO. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP Alexander L. Cheney (SBN 302157) acheney@willkie.com 333 Bush Street San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 858-7400 Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice) slombardi@willkie.com 787 7th Avenue New York, NY 10019 (212) 728-8000 Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) jlevy@willkie.com 1875 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006-1238 (202) 303-1000 Attorneys for Respondent Oto Analytics, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, Petitioner, v. OTO ANALYTICS, LLC, Respondent. Case No. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO Document 26-1 Filed 08/26/24 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED CASE NO. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO Upon consideration of Respondent’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed, it is hereby ORDERED that the following documents are filed under seal provisionally until the Court makes a determination of whether the material shall remain under seal: Document title or description Dkt. No. of redacted version Dkt. No. of unredacted version Dkt. No. of decl. in support of sealing Party with burden to substantiate need to seal Full or partial sealing sought Brief statement of reason for sealing Granted/ Denied Opposition to Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration Award 25 26-2 Petitioner, Benworth Partial, Page 12, Lines 8–12. Material that Petitioner has claimed or may claim is confidential Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Alexander L. Cheney 25-4 26-3 Petitioner, Benworth Full Material that Petitioner has claimed or may claim is confidential IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ________________ _____________________________________ Honorable Araceli Martínez-Olguín United States District Judge Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO Document 26-1 Filed 08/26/24 Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.433897.26.1.pdf
- Size
- 301,338 bytes
- SHA-256
- e2b17ed1694aa8374e73d9d5b2a0a4d4dc60ed7cc1ad48e8dd8b4604225695d6
- Original
- PACER (login required)