Court filing

Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by… — Benworth Oto (Dkt. 26)

Summary

Oto Analytics, LLC's administrative motion to consider whether another party's material should be sealed, in Benworth Capital Partners LLC v. Oto Analytics, LLC, Case No. 3:24-cv-4840-AMO, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, filed 08/26/24 as Document 26 (4 pages). Under Civil Local Rule 79-5(f), Womply says its opposition to the petition to vacate and Exhibit 2 to the Cheney Declaration contain information Benworth has claimed or may claim is confidential. It provisionally files under seal page 12, lines 8-12 of the opposition and all of Exhibit 2, and notes that Benworth bears the burden of justifying any sealing. The motion does not describe the sealed content.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed	2024-08-26

Cite this document

“Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by… — Benworth Oto (Dkt. 26).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:24-cv-04840-AMO, Doc. 26, filed 2024-08-26. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-benworth-oto-cand-433897/2024-08-26-gov-uscourts-cand-433897-26-0-gov-uscourts-cand-433897-26-0/, SHA-256 1c7bce852388da6b2e51dcaafbe0e871d073b5c2808e2d782ea76a8b4f8025ae.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S 
MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO
 
 
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP
Alexander L. Cheney (SBN 302157) 
acheney@willkie.com 
333 Bush Street 
San Francisco, CA 94104 
(415) 858-7400 
 
Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice) 
slombardi@willkie.com 
787 7th Avenue 
New York, NY 10019 
(212) 728-8000 
 
Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) 
jlevy@willkie.com 
1875 K Street, N.W. 
Washington, DC 20006-1238 
(202) 303-1000 
 
Attorneys for Respondent 
Oto Analytics, LLC 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC,
Petitioner, 
v. 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC, 
Respondent. 
Case No. 3:24-cv-4840-AMO
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER 
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL 
SHOULD BE SEALED 
Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 26     Filed 08/26/24     Page 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S 
MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO
 
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f), Respondent Oto Analytics, LLC (f/k/a Oto Analytics, 
Inc., d/b/a Womply) (“Womply”) respectfully submits this Administrative Motion To Consider 
Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed (“Administrative Motion”) in connection with 
its Opposition to Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration Award (“Opposition”). 
Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) provides that “[f]or any document a party (‘Filing Party’) seeks to 
seal because that document has been designated as confidential by another party or non-party, (the 
‘Designating Party’), the Filing Party must . . . file an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether 
Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed,” so that “the Designating Party [can] file a statement 
and/or declaration” justifying any sealing or redaction.  In accordance with Civil Local 
Rule 79-5(f), Respondent submits this Administrative Motion because its Opposition and 
accompanying exhibits to the Declaration of Alexander L. Cheney (“Cheney Declaration”) contain 
certain information that Petitioner Benworth Capital Partners LLP (“Benworth”) has claimed or 
may claim is confidential.  Benworth has the burden to justify its claims of confidentiality and to 
establish that the designated information is sealable.  Civ. L.R. 79-5(f)(3) & (c)(1).  In the interim, 
Womply is provisionally submitting the following information under seal: 
Document 
title or 
description
Dkt. No. 
of 
redacted 
version 
Dkt. No. of 
unredacted
version 
Dkt. 
No. of 
decl. in 
support 
of 
sealing 
Party with 
burden to 
substantiate
need to seal 
Full or 
partial 
sealing 
sought 
Brief 
statement 
of 
reason for 
sealing 
 
Granted/ 
Denied 
 
 
Opposition 
to Petition 
to Vacate 
Final 
Arbitration 
Award 
25 
26-2 
 
Petitioner, 
Benworth 
Partial, 
Page 
12, 
Lines 
8–12. 
Material 
that 
Petitioner 
has claimed 
or may 
claim is 
confidential
 
Exhibit 2 to 
Declaration 
of 
Alexander 
L. Cheney 
25-4 
26-3 
 
Petitioner, 
Benworth 
Full 
Material 
that 
Petitioner 
has claimed 
or may 
claim is 
confidential
 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 26     Filed 08/26/24     Page 2 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S 
MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO
 
WHEREFORE, Womply respectfully submits this Administrative Motion pursuant to Civil 
Local Rule 79-5, and hereby notifies Benworth of its burden to establish that the designated material 
is sealable if Benworth seeks to have the material sealed.  In accordance with Civil Local 
Rule 79-5(e), unredacted versions of these documents accompany this Administrative Motion. 
 
Date: August 26, 2024  
 
 
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP 
 
 
 
 
 
By: 
 /s/ Alexander L. Cheney 
 
         Alexander L. Cheney 
         Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice) 
         Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) 
 
        Attorneys for Respondent 
       Oto Analytics, LLC
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 26     Filed 08/26/24     Page 3 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S 
MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that on August 26, 2024, I served a copy of Respondent’s Administrative 
Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed; a [Proposed] Order 
Granting Respondent’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material 
Should be Sealed; Respondent’s Opposition to Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration Award, and 
Exhibit 2 to the Cheney Declaration, by transmitting via e-mail or electronic transmission the 
foregoing documents to the persons at the e-mail addresses set forth below: 
GIRARD SHARP LLP  
 
Daniel C. Girard (State Bar No. 114826) 
Simon S. Grille (State Bar No. 294914) 
601 California Street, Suite 1400  
San Francisco, CA 94108  
Telephone: (415) 981-4800  
dgirard@girardsharp.com 
sgrille@girardsharp.com  
 
KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON  
 
Jorge L. Piedra (admitted pro hac vice) 
Dwayne A. Robinson (admitted pro hac vice) 
Michael R. Lorigas (admitted pro hac vice) 
2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor  
Miami, Florida 33134  
Telephone: (305) 372-1800 
jpiedra@kttlaw.com  
drobinson@kttlaw.com  
mlorigas@kttlaw.com  
 
Dated: August 26, 2024  
 
 
 
 
By: /s/ Alexander L. Cheney _____ 
Attorney for Respondent Oto Analytics, LLC 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 26     Filed 08/26/24     Page 4 of 4

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.cand.433897.26.0.pdf
Size: 383,577 bytes
SHA-256: 1c7bce852388da6b2e51dcaafbe0e871d073b5c2808e2d782ea76a8b4f8025ae
Our copy: gov.uscourts.cand.433897.26.0.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)