Proposed Order — Benworth Oto (Dkt. 29.1)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:24-cv-04840-AMO · Doc. 29-1 · 2024-08-30 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

[PROPOSED] ORDER UPON PETITIONER’S ADMIN. MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO REPLY 
TO OTO ANALYTICS, LLC’S OPPOSITION TO PETITION TO VACATE FINAL ARBITRATION AWARD 
CASE No. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP 
Alexander L. Cheney (SBN 302157) 
acheney@willkie.com 
333 Bush Street 
San Francisco, CA 94104 
(415) 858-7400 
 
Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice) 
slombardi@willkie.com 
787 7th Avenue 
New York, NY 10019 
(212) 728-8000 
 
Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) 
jlevy@willkie.com 
1875 K Street, N.W. 
Washington, DC 20006-1238 
(202) 303-1000 
 
Attorneys for Petitioner 
Oto Analytics, LLC 
 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, 
Petitioner, 
v. 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC, 
Respondent.  
 Case No. 3:24-cv-4840-AMO 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER UPON  
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION FOR ENLARGMENT OF TIME 
TO REPLY TO OTO ANALYTICS, LLC’S 
OPPOSITION TO PETITION TO VACATE 
FINAL ARBITRATION AWARD 
 
Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 29-1     Filed 08/30/24     Page 1 of 2

 
 
1 
[PROPOSED] ORDER UPON PETITIONER’S ADMIN. MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO REPLY 
TO OTO ANALYTICS, LLC’S OPPOSITION TO PETITION TO VACATE FINAL ARBITRATION AWARD 
CASE No. 3:24-CV-4840-AMO 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Benworth’s Capital Partners LLC’s (“Benworth”) 
Administrative Motion for Enlargement of Time to Reply to Oto Analytics, LLC’s Opposition to 
Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration Award (“the Motion”). The Court, having reviewed the 
Motion and opposition thereto, hereby orders as follows: 
IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: 
1. 
Benworth’s Motion is DENIED. 
2. 
Benworth shall file its reply to Respondent Oto Analytics, LLC’s Opposition to 
Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration Award on or before September 3, 2024. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
DATED: _______________  
 
______________________________ 
  
 
 
 
Honorable Araceli Martínez-Olguín 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States District Judge 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 29-1     Filed 08/30/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.433897.29.1.pdf

Size

351,734 bytes

SHA-256

5383f9058a21315c1e1ea605a405fc75deab7a491e58f6eb3c6b5ae865249e2b

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.433897.29.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)