Court filing
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: 130 MOTION to Accelerate/Extend/Reset… — USA v. Thomas (Dkt. 132)
Summary
The Government's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Extend Self-Surrender Date (Dkt. # 130), Document 132, filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/21/22, in United States v. Aleta Necole Thomas, Case No. 21-CR-239-GKF, in the Northern District of Oklahoma. The Government argues that the court should deny Thomas's second request to delay surrender because the medical records attached to her motion, from a July 19, 2022 emergency department visit, do not show exceptional circumstances or medical reasons. It notes that the court denied her first request on July 15, 2022, and that she can obtain care in Bureau of Prisons custody. It adds that her repeated requests raise a question about flight risk and asks the court to order immediate surrender.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed July 21, 2022 in Aleta Necole Thomas; one of 69 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-07-21 |
Cite this document
“RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: 130 MOTION to Accelerate/Extend/Reset… — USA v. Thomas (Dkt. 132).”
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, No. 4:21-cr-00239-GKF, Doc. 132, filed 2022-07-21. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-aleta-necole-thomas-oknd-57939/2022-07-21-gov-uscourts-oknd-57939-132-0-doc-132/
, SHA-256 5d4c5aa00cff6a3dcd99799cb66abc8cfc4a6ac8e36f07811c210ec30210ec3a.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALETA NECOLE THOMAS,
Defendant.
Case No. 21-CR-239-GKF
Response in Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion to Extend Self-Surrender Date (Dkt. # 130)
The Court should deny Aleta Thomas’s request to delay her self-surrender
because the medical records included in Exhibit A of her motion rule out an acute
stroke and other neurological deficits as causes of Ms. Thomas’s subjective
complaints of pain and other symptoms. In fact, her medical records show that Ms.
Thomas has recently received a comprehensive medical evaluation that did not
result in further medical care, evaluation, or treatment. Consequently, Ms. Thomas
is unable to prove exceptional circumstances or medical reasons for delaying her
surrender.
Facts
The Court denied Ms. Thomas’s first request to delay her self-surrender on July
15, 2022. (See Dkt. # 129). Four days later, on July 19, 2022, Ms. Thomas visited her
primary care physician and complained of pain in her head and right leg. Ms.
Case 4:21-cr-00239-GKF Document 132 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/21/22 Page 1 of 4
2
Thomas later reported to the St. John Medical Center emergency department, where
Physician Assistant Mark Steichen evaluated Ms. Thomas for a potential recent
stroke. (Dkt. # 130, Ex. A at 1). Under Dr. Christopher Abdo’s supervision, Mr.
Steichen assessed Ms. Thomas and ordered tests. According to Mr. Steichen’s
medical history notes, Ms. Thomas claimed she experienced a previous stroke.
However, her past medical tests, including MRIs, ruled out stroke. Mr. Steichen’s
recent evaluation of Ms. Thomas and other test results revealed “no acute findings”
and “No evidence of acute stroke at this time.” (Id. at 1, 3).
Also on July 19, 2022, Dr. Ian T. Fischer evaluated the results of a computed
tomography angiogram scan of Ms. Thomas’s head and neck. Dr. Fischer concluded
that they revealed “no aneurysm” nor evidence of any other medical condition. (Id.
at 5). Dr. Bryan Scott Smith also reviewed images of Ms. Thomas’s chest and noted
that there was nothing wrong with her heart, lungs, or thorax. Dr. Smith concluded
that Ms. Thomas had “No acute intrathoracic abnormality,” and labeled Ms.
Thomas’s medical situation as “nonemergent.” (Id. at 6).
Argument & Authorities
Ms. Thomas’s second request to stay her self-surrender fails to show exceptional
circumstances or medical reasons for delaying her surrender to prison.
Ms. Thomas’s medical records show that the medical staff at the St. John
Hospital emergency department ruled out any medical problem related to Ms.
Thomas’s subjective complaint of pain. According to her records, she was also not
admitted to the hospital for additional treatment or evaluation. Further, Ms.
Case 4:21-cr-00239-GKF Document 132 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/21/22 Page 2 of 4
3
Thomas’s medical records fail to show that she was referred to a specialist or any
other medical doctor, for follow-up tests or care. Nothing in Ms. Thomas’s motion or
medical records support her position that the court should delay her self-surrender. In
the event Ms. Thomas needs additional medical care, she can obtain that care while
in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons. Thus, the Court should deny her second
request to delay her self-surrender.
At her sentencing, the Court made findings that Ms. Thomas was unlikely to flee
or pose a danger to another person or the community, consistent with 18 U.S.C. §
3142(a)(2)(B). Now, however, Ms. Thomas’s late and repeated requests to delay her
self-surrender call into question whether she is likely to flee. Accordingly, the Court
should order Ms. Thomas to surrender at once and without further delay.
Conclusion
The Court should deny Ms. Thomas’s second request to delay her self-surrender
because Ms. Thomas’s medical records rule out any medical condition as the cause
of her subjective complaints of pain and other symptoms. Ms. Thomas has received a
recent comprehensive medical evaluation that resulted in no diagnosis warranting
further medical care, evaluation, or treatment. Consequently, Ms. Thomas is again
unable to prove exceptional circumstances or medical reasons for delaying her
surrender to the Bureau of Prisons. Therefore, the Court should deny her Motion to
Extend Self-Surrender Date (Dkt. # 130).
Case 4:21-cr-00239-GKF Document 132 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/21/22 Page 3 of 4
4
Respectfully submitted,
CLINTON J. JOHNSON
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
/s/ Kristin F. Harrington
Kristin F. Harrington, OBA No. 21185
Assistant United States Attorney
110 West Seventh Street, Suite 300
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119
(918) 382-2785
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on the day of July 21, 2022, I served the foregoing document
via electronic email, on the following:
Matthew Allen Chivari, Esq.
mchivari@lowtherwalker.com
Counsel for Ms. Thomas
/s/ Kristin F. Harrington
Kristin F. Harrington
Assistant United States Attorney
Case 4:21-cr-00239-GKF Document 132 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/21/22 Page 4 of 4File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.oknd.57939.132.0.pdf
- Size
- 103,598 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5d4c5aa00cff6a3dcd99799cb66abc8cfc4a6ac8e36f07811c210ec30210ec3a
- Original
- PACER (login required)