Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Ilori et al United States v. Chris Recamier — U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. Memo ENDORSEMENTgranting 69 Letter Motion re: 69 Consent Letter Motion — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 70, S.D.N.Y.)

Court filing

Memo ENDORSEMENTgranting 69 Letter Motion re: 69 Consent Letter Motion — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 70, S.D.N.Y.)

Summary

A consent letter motion dated August 24, 2022, Document 70, stamped Filed 08/24/22, from the Government to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in United States v. Adedayo Ilori, S1 21 Cr. 746 (MKV), in the Southern District of New York. It notes that before his arrest in this case the defendant was on pretrial release in United States v. Chancy et al., 20 Cr. 378 (LJL), with electronic monitoring. Because Pretrial Services requires a court order, the Government asks the court, with the defendant's consent, to order Pretrial Services to produce his electronic monitoring data to the Government, which will share it with him. The docket title calls the page a memo endorsement granting the motion, but no endorsement text is in the document text.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed August 24, 2022 in USA v. Ilori et al.; one of 179 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Filed2022-08-24

Cite this document

“Memo ENDORSEMENTgranting 69 Letter Motion re: 69 Consent Letter Motion — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 70, S.D.N.Y.).” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:21-cr-00746-MKV, Doc. 70, filed 2022-08-24. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-adedayo-ilori-nysd-571512/2022-08-24-gov-uscourts-nysd-571512-70-0-doc-70/, SHA-256 b08d0d9e2bb116381a3437a84b9afec5a01eb82878475ded4d64e6201e6f6b21.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

[Type text] 
August 24, 2022 
BY ECF 
The Honorable Mary Kay Vyskocil 
United States District Judge  
Southern District of New York 
 
500 Pearl Street 
 
New York, New York 10007  
Re: 
United States v. Adedayo Ilori, 
S1 21 Cr. 746 (MKV) 
Dear Judge Vyskocil: 
As the Court is aware, before his arrest in the instant case, the defendant was under 
conditions of pretrial release while facing charges in United States v. Chancy et al., 20 Cr. 378 
(LJL).  Among other conditions, the defendant was subject to electronic monitoring for a period 
of his pretrial release.  The defendant has requested that the Government obtain records from 
Pretrial Services concerning the defendant’s electronic monitoring during the term of his pretrial 
release.  Based on the Government’s communications with Pretrial Services, the Government 
understands that Pretrial Services requires a court order to release this information.  Accordingly, 
with the consent of the defendant, the Government respectfully requests that the Court order 
Pretrial Services to produce the defendant’s electronic monitoring data to the Government, which 
will then share it with the defendant.  
Respectfully submitted, 
DAMIAN WILLIAMS 
United States Attorney for the 
Southern District of New York 
      By: /s/__________________________ 
Juliana N. Murray 
Daniel G. Nessim 
Assistant United States Attorneys 
(212) 637-2314 / -2486
The Silvio J. Mollo Building 
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza 
New York, New York 10007
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of New York 
8/24/2022
8/24/2022
USDC SDNY 
DOCUMENT 
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 
DOC #: 
 
 
 
DATE FILED: 
 
 
Case 1:21-cr-00746-MKV   Document 70   Filed 08/24/22   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nysd.571512.70.0.pdf
Size
259,320 bytes
SHA-256
b08d0d9e2bb116381a3437a84b9afec5a01eb82878475ded4d64e6201e6f6b21
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nysd.571512.70.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
  1. CONSENT LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Daniel Nessim dated… — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 69)same docket · 2022-08-24
  2. Scheduling Order as to Adedayo Ilori — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 79, S.D.N.Y.)same docket · 2022-10-12
  3. NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Adedayo Ilori.… — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 67)same docket · 2022-08-11
  4. Order 82 It is hereby Ordered that the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 83, S.D.N.Y.)same docket · 2022-10-19
  5. Order as to Adedayo Ilori: IT is Hereby Ordered that the arraignment — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 63, S.D.N.Y.)same docket · 2022-07-20
  6. Order 84 Letter Motion addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 85, S.D.N.Y.)same docket · 2022-10-21
  7. CONSENT LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Daniel Nessim dated July… — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 62)same docket · 2022-07-19
  8. JOINT LETTER by USA as to Adedayo Ilori addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Daniel… — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 61)same docket · 2022-07-18
  9. Order as to Adedayo Ilori. On November — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 87, S.D.N.Y.)same case · 2022-11-02
  10. Motion for Extension of Time to File. Document filed by Adedayo Ilori — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 88, S.D.N.Y.)same case · 2022-11-03
  11. Memo Endorsement as to Adedayo Ilori — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 89, S.D.N.Y.)same case · 2022-11-03
  12. 3500 Protective Order as to Adedayo Ilori...regarding procedures — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 56, S.D.N.Y.)same case · 2022-07-07
  13. Text of Proposed Order Proposed Protective Order — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 55.1)same case · 2022-07-07
  14. CONSENT LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Daniel Nessim dated July… — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 55)same case · 2022-07-07
  15. LETTER by Adedayo Ilori addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Peter E.… — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 50)same case · 2022-07-06
  16. Order as to Adedayo Ilori: Upon the application — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 49, S.D.N.Y.)same case · 2022-07-06
  17. Opinion and Order on Motion in Limine — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 48, S.D.N.Y.)same docket · 2022-07-05
  18. Affirmation of Peter E. Brill in Opposition as to Adedayo Ilori re 42 Motion in Limine — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 46, S.D.N.Y.)same docket · 2022-06-25
  19. Exhibit Proposed Verdict Form — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 45.3)same docket · 2022-06-22
  20. Exhibit Proposed Requests to Charge — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 45-2, S.D.N.Y.)same docket · 2022-06-22

Part of: United States v. Chris Recamier — U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. · U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) · COVID Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL) · Criminal prosecutions · Motions · 2022 · Court filings

Back to top