Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Ilori et al — U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York CONSENT LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Daniel Nessim dated… —…

Court filing

CONSENT LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Daniel Nessim dated… — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 69)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Filed2022-08-24

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · No. 1:21-cr-00746-MKV · Doc. 69 · 2022-08-24 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

A consent letter motion dated August 24, 2022 from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in United States v. Adedayo Ilori, No. 1:21-cr-00746-MKV, filed as Document 69. The letter states that before his arrest in this case the defendant was on pretrial release, including electronic monitoring, while facing charges in United States v. Chancy et al., 20 Cr. 378 (LJL). It states the defendant asked the government to obtain Pretrial Services records of that monitoring and that Pretrial Services requires a court order to release them. With the defendant's consent, the government asks the court to order Pretrial Services to produce the monitoring data to the government, which would share it with the defendant. The letter is signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Juliana N. Murray and Daniel G. Nessim.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

[Type text] 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
August 24, 2022 
 
BY ECF 
 
The Honorable Mary Kay Vyskocil   
 
 
 
United States District Judge  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Southern District of New York 
 
 
 
 
 
 
500 Pearl Street 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
New York, New York 10007  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Re: 
United States v. Adedayo Ilori,  
S1 21 Cr. 746 (MKV) 
 
Dear Judge Vyskocil: 
 
As the Court is aware, before his arrest in the instant case, the defendant was under 
conditions of pretrial release while facing charges in United States v. Chancy et al., 20 Cr. 378 
(LJL).  Among other conditions, the defendant was subject to electronic monitoring for a period 
of his pretrial release.  The defendant has requested that the Government obtain records from 
Pretrial Services concerning the defendant’s electronic monitoring during the term of his pretrial 
release.  Based on the Government’s communications with Pretrial Services, the Government 
understands that Pretrial Services requires a court order to release this information.  Accordingly, 
with the consent of the defendant, the Government respectfully requests that the Court order 
Pretrial Services to produce the defendant’s electronic monitoring data to the Government, which 
will then share it with the defendant.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
DAMIAN WILLIAMS 
United States Attorney for the 
 
Southern District of New York 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      By: /s/__________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Juliana N. Murray 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Daniel G. Nessim 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assistant United States Attorneys 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(212) 637-2314 / -2486 
 
cc:  Peter Brill, Esq. (by ECF) 
 
The Silvio J. Mollo Building 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
New York, New York 10007 
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of New York 
Case 1:21-cr-00746-MKV     Document 69     Filed 08/24/22     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nysd.571512.69.0.pdf
Size
217,381 bytes
SHA-256
4ff8492990564a6aa398d0655b56b2d00efed79e6f0c76d3588e973d4cbec0ab
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nysd.571512.69.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top