Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Agent Fee Litigation Proposed Order — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 27.2)

Court filing

Proposed Order — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 27.2)

Summary

A proposed order filed May 18, 2020 in American Video Duplicating, Inc., et al. v. Citigroup Inc., et al., No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, submitted for signature by Judge Otis D. Wright II. The caption lists the plaintiffs, suing on behalf of a class, and defendant lenders including Citigroup Inc., Citibank, N.A., U.S. Bancorp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co., Bank of America N.A. and PayPal Holdings, Inc., and notes the complaint was filed April 27, 2020. The proposed order would grant the motion to dismiss brought by specially appearing defendant Citigroup Inc. and defendant Citibank, N.A. under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(2). It would dismiss the claims against the Citi defendants in their entirety with prejudice. It is Doc. 27-2, two pages, with the date and signature lines blank.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR · Doc. 27-2 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

     Case 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR        Document 27-2    Filed 05/18/20   Page 1 of 2 Page ID
                                             #:133



 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
                         CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12    AMERICAN VIDEO DUPLICATING,                       Case No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-
      INC., a California corporation; TUSH LAW          AGR
13
      LTD., a California limited partnership, and
14    KENNETH M. HAHN, a sole proprietor,               [PROPOSED] ORDER
                                                        GRANTING MOTION TO
      DBA CAL STATE FINANCIAL,                          DISMISS BY SPECIALLY
15
      individually and on behalf of a class of          APPEARING DEFENDANT
16    similarly situation businesses and individuals,   CITIGROUP INC. AND
                                                        DEFENDANT CITIBANK,
17                                                      N.A. [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1),
                         Plaintiffs,                    12(b)(6), & 12(b)(2)]
18          v.                                          Complaint Filed: April 27, 2020
19    CITIGROUP INC., CITIBANK, N.A.; U.S.
20    BANCORP., U.S. BANK, N.A.;
      JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., JPMORGAN
21    CHASE BANK, N.A., WELLS FARGO &
      CO., WELLS FARGO N.A.; BANK OF
22    AMERICA CO., BANK OF AMERICA
      N.A.; MUFG BANK LTD., MUFG UNION
23    BANK N.A.; LIVE OAK BANKSHARES
      INC., LIVE OAK BANKING COMPANY;
24    PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC.; NEWTEK
      BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.; HAVEST
25    SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE; and; DOE
      LENDERS 1 to 4,975, inclusive,
26                       Defendants.
27
28

                                           [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 2:20-CV-03815-ODW-AGR
     Case 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR       Document 27-2     Filed 05/18/20   Page 2 of 2 Page ID
                                            #:134



 1          This matter coming before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by
 2    specially appearing Defendant Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) and Defendant
 3    Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank,” and together, the “Citi Defendants”) pursuant to Fed.
 4    R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and, with respect to the claims against Citigroup, Fed.
 5    R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), it is hereby ordered that the motion is GRANTED. The claims
 6    against the Citi Defendants in Plaintiffs’ Complaint are DISMISSED in their
 7    entirety with prejudice.
 8
 9    IT IS SO ORDERED,
10
11    Date: __________________                      ___________________________
                                                    Honorable Otis D. Wright II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

                                           [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 2:20-CV-03815-ODW-AGR


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cacd.780998.27.2.pdf
Size
37,671 bytes
SHA-256
a84a8ffcc9a5333f4b64507b9bc2906a89f9c373c3dea2e4191c01c831b52180
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cacd.780998.27.2.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top