Court filing
Proposed Order — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 27.2)
Summary
A proposed order filed May 18, 2020 in American Video Duplicating, Inc., et al. v. Citigroup Inc., et al., No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, submitted for signature by Judge Otis D. Wright II. The caption lists the plaintiffs, suing on behalf of a class, and defendant lenders including Citigroup Inc., Citibank, N.A., U.S. Bancorp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co., Bank of America N.A. and PayPal Holdings, Inc., and notes the complaint was filed April 27, 2020. The proposed order would grant the motion to dismiss brought by specially appearing defendant Citigroup Inc. and defendant Citibank, N.A. under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(2). It would dismiss the claims against the Citi defendants in their entirety with prejudice. It is Doc. 27-2, two pages, with the date and signature lines blank.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR · Doc. 27-2 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR Document 27-2 Filed 05/18/20 Page 1 of 2 Page ID
#:133
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 AMERICAN VIDEO DUPLICATING, Case No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-
INC., a California corporation; TUSH LAW AGR
13
LTD., a California limited partnership, and
14 KENNETH M. HAHN, a sole proprietor, [PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING MOTION TO
DBA CAL STATE FINANCIAL, DISMISS BY SPECIALLY
15
individually and on behalf of a class of APPEARING DEFENDANT
16 similarly situation businesses and individuals, CITIGROUP INC. AND
DEFENDANT CITIBANK,
17 N.A. [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1),
Plaintiffs, 12(b)(6), & 12(b)(2)]
18 v. Complaint Filed: April 27, 2020
19 CITIGROUP INC., CITIBANK, N.A.; U.S.
20 BANCORP., U.S. BANK, N.A.;
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., JPMORGAN
21 CHASE BANK, N.A., WELLS FARGO &
CO., WELLS FARGO N.A.; BANK OF
22 AMERICA CO., BANK OF AMERICA
N.A.; MUFG BANK LTD., MUFG UNION
23 BANK N.A.; LIVE OAK BANKSHARES
INC., LIVE OAK BANKING COMPANY;
24 PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC.; NEWTEK
BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.; HAVEST
25 SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE; and; DOE
LENDERS 1 to 4,975, inclusive,
26 Defendants.
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 2:20-CV-03815-ODW-AGR
Case 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR Document 27-2 Filed 05/18/20 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
#:134
1 This matter coming before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by
2 specially appearing Defendant Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) and Defendant
3 Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank,” and together, the “Citi Defendants”) pursuant to Fed.
4 R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and, with respect to the claims against Citigroup, Fed.
5 R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), it is hereby ordered that the motion is GRANTED. The claims
6 against the Citi Defendants in Plaintiffs’ Complaint are DISMISSED in their
7 entirety with prejudice.
8
9 IT IS SO ORDERED,
10
11 Date: __________________ ___________________________
Honorable Otis D. Wright II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 2:20-CV-03815-ODW-AGR
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.780998.27.2.pdf
- Size
- 37,671 bytes
- SHA-256
- a84a8ffcc9a5333f4b64507b9bc2906a89f9c373c3dea2e4191c01c831b52180
- Original
- No public link identified.