Court filing
NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE:… — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 38)
Summary
A clerk's Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application, dated May 21, 2020 and filed as Document 38 in American Video Duplicating Inc. et al v. Citigroup Inc. et al, Case No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. It concerns an Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice, docket number 36, filed May 20, 2020. The checked deficiency, under Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a), is that the application is not complete because the state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. The one-page form (G-112C) states that the Court may deny the application, order a corrected document, strike it or take other action, and that no response is needed unless the Court directs one.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR · Doc. 38 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR Document 38 Filed 05/21/20 Page 1 of 1 Page ID
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
#:162
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
American Video Duplicating Inc. et al CASE NUMBER:
2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR
PLAINTIFF(S)
v.
Citigroup Inc. et al NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN
ELECTRONICALLY FILED PRO HAC VICE
DEFENDANT(S) APPLICATION
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
The following problem(s) have been found with your electronically filed document:
May 20, 2020 36 Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice
Date Filed Doc. No. Title of Doc.
ERRORS WITH DOCUMENT
Document submitted in wrong case.
Incorrect document attached to the docket entry.
Incorrect event selected. Correct event is "Appear Pro Hac Vice (G-64 or pleading)."
Hearing date set, but no hearing required.
Superseded version of Form G-64 used.
Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed.
Local Rule 5-4.4.2 WordPerfect or Word copy of the proposed order not emailed to the
assigned judge's generic chambers email address.
Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(a) Applicant resides in California.
✔ Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant
has been admitted are not listed.
Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached.
Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(c) $400 fee not paid.
Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to
which the applicant has been admitted.
Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Attached Certificate of Good Standing not issued within 30 days prior to
filing of the application.
Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain "an office within the District for the practice of
law, in which the attorney is physically present on a regular basis to conduct
business."
Other:
Note: In response to this notice, the Court may: 1) deny the Application; 2) order an amended or corrected document to be
filed; 3) order the document stricken; or 4) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any
action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so.
Clerk, U.S. District Court
Dated: May 21, 2020 By: Lupe_Thrasher@cacd.uscourts.gov
Deputy Clerk
cc: Assigned District Judge and/or Magistrate Judge
Please refer to the Court’s website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov for Local Rules, General Orders, and applicable forms.
G-112C (02/20) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.780998.38.0.pdf
- Size
- 1,189,586 bytes
- SHA-256
- 54daab2e448cb4478a82160acfde17681917ad8fe8260571e61d8cb5f2b9c00a
- Original
- No public link identified.