Proposed Order on Amended Pro Hac Vice Application — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 42.1)

Summary

A proposed order on an amended application of a non-resident attorney to appear pro hac vice in American Video Duplicating, Inc., et al. v. Citigroup Inc., et al., Case Number 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, filed May 22, 2020 as Document 42-1. The application is by Michael S. Kraut of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP to appear on behalf of defendants U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank National Association, with J. Warren Rissier of the same firm designated as local counsel. The one-page G-64 order form leaves unchecked the boxes for granting or denying the application, the listed grounds for denial under L.R. 83-2.1.3.2 and L.R. 83-2.1.3.4, and the refund of the application fee. The date and judge's signature lines are blank.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

    Case 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR                          Document 42-1              Filed 05/22/20             Page 1 of 1 Page ID
                                                              #:175
 J. Warren Rissier (SBN 197939)
 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
 300 South Grand Avenue, Twenty-Second Floor
 Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132
 Phone: +1.213.612.2500; Fax: +1.213.612.2501
 Email: warren.rissier@morganlewis.com

                                    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                   CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
 AMERICAN VIDEO DUPLICATING, INC., et al.,                            CASE NUMBER
                                                                                            2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR
                                                       Plaintiff(s)
                             v.
 CITIGROUP INC., et al.,                                                    (PROPOSED) ORDER ON AMENDED
                                                                      APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO
                                                    Defendant(s).       APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE
The Court, having determined whether the required fee has been paid, and having reviewed the Application of
Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice filed by
 Kraut, Michael S.                                                                of   Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
 Applicant’s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial                              101 Park Avenue
 212-309-6000                            212-309-6001                                  New York, NY 10178
 Telephone Number                        Fax Number
 michael.kraut@morganlewis.com
                             E-Mail Address                                            Firm/Agency Name & Address
for permission to appear and participate in this case on behalf of
 U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank National Association



 Name(s) of Party(ies) Represent                                 ☐Plaintiff(s) ☒ Defendant(s) ☐Other:
and designating as Local Counsel
 Rissier, J. Warren                                                               of   Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
 Designee’s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial                               300 South Grand Avenue, 22nd Floor
 197939                           213-612-2500              213-612-2501               Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132
 Designee’s Cal. Bar No.          Phone Number                   Fax Number
 warren.rissier@morganlewis.com
                             E-Mail Address                                            Firm/Agency Name & Address
HEREBY ORDERS THAT the Application be:
 ☐GRANTED
 ☐DENIED:             ☐   for failure to pay the required fee.
                      ☐   for failure to attach a Certificate of Good Standing issued within 30 days prior to filing of Application.
                      ☐   for failure to complete Application:
                      ☐   pursuant to L.R. 83-2.1.3.2: ☐Applicant resides in California; ☐ previous Applications listed indicate Applicant
                          is regularly employed or engaged in business, professional, or other similar activities in California.
                      ☐   pursuant to L.R. 83-2.1.3.4; Local Counsel: ☐ is not member of Bar of this Court; ☐ does not maintain office
                          District.
                      ☐ because
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Application fee, if paid: ☐ be refunded ☐ not be refunded.

Dated: Click here to enter a date.
                                                                               U.S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge

 G-64 Order (05/16)    (PROPOSED) ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE              Page 1 of 1


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cacd.780998.42.1.pdf

Size

115,216 bytes

SHA-256

19533d990d219fa240a98fd48e60fa445b2b8b2cd757f568c3d612d1e876af1c

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cacd.780998.42.1.pdf

Original

No public link identified.