Proposed Order — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 17.1)

Summary

A proposed order on an application of a non-resident attorney to appear pro hac vice, filed May 14, 2020 as Doc. 17-1 in American Video Duplicating, Inc, et al. v. Citigroup Inc., et al., No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The form order addresses the application of Christopher S. Comstock of Mayer Brown LLP to appear on behalf of defendants Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A. It designates Bronwyn F. Pollock of Mayer Brown LLP as local counsel. The grant or denial boxes, the fee refund boxes and the date are left blank for the judge. It is on the court's G-64 Order (05/16) form.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

    Case 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR                             Document 17-1              Filed 05/14/20             Page 1 of 1 Page ID
 BRONWYN F. POLLOCK (SBN 210912) #:80
  bpollock@mayerbrown.com
 350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503
 Telephone: (213) 229-9500
 Facsimile: (213) 625-0248
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
 American Video Duplicating, Inc, et al.                                   CASE NUMBER

                                                            Plaintiff(s)                  2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR
                                v.
 Citigroup Inc., et al.                                                     (PROPOSED) ORDER ON APPLICATION OF
                                                                            NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN
                                                         Defendant(s).          A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE
The Court, having determined whether the required fee has been paid, and having reviewed the Application of
Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice filed by
 Comstock, Christopher S.                                                            of   MAYER BROWN LLP
 Applicant’s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial                                 71 S. Wacker Drive
 (312) 701-8386                             (312) 706-9372                                Chicago, IL 60606
 Telephone Number                           Fax Number
 ccomstock@mayerbrown.com
                                E-Mail Address                                            Firm/Agency Name & Address
for permission to appear and participate in this case on behalf of
 Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A.



 Name(s) of Party(ies) Represent                                    ☐Plaintiff(s) ☒ Defendant(s) ☐Other:
and designating as Local Counsel
 Bronwyn F. Pollock                                                                  of   MAYER BROWN LLP
 Designee’s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial                                  350 S. GRAND AVE., 25TH Floor
 210912                              213 229 5194                   213 576 8138          Los Angeles, CA 90071
 Designee’s Cal. Bar No.             Telephone Number               Fax Number
 bpollock@mayerbrown.com
                                E-Mail Address                                            Firm/Agency Name & Address
HEREBY ORDERS THAT the Application be:
 ☐GRANTED
 ☐DENIED:             ☐      for failure to pay the required fee.
                      ☐      for failure to attach a Certificate of Good Standing issued within 30 days prior to filing of Application.
                      ☐      for failure to complete Application:
                      ☐      pursuant to L.R. 83-2.1.3.2: ☐Applicant resides in California; ☐ previous Applications listed indicate Applicant
                             is regularly employed or engaged in business, professional, or other similar activities in California.
                      ☐      pursuant to L.R. 83-2.1.3.4; Local Counsel: ☐ is not member of Bar of this Court; ☐ does not maintain office
                             District.
                      ☐ because
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Application fee, if paid: ☐ be refunded ☐ not be refunded.

Dated: Click here to enter a date.
                                                                                   U.S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge

 G-64 Order (05/16)       (PROPOSED) ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE              Page 1 of 1


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cacd.780998.17.1.pdf

Size

114,839 bytes

SHA-256

98cc5c9c737433f7cc5affbf9067bc2d0fbd8ca6e710862cb5b4cdb03ea0e1b5

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cacd.780998.17.1.pdf

Original

No public link identified.