Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Agent Fee Litigation ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Thomas V.… — Agent Fee Litigation (…

Court filing

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Thomas V.… — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 24)

Summary

An order on an application of a non-resident attorney to appear pro hac vice, dated May 18, 2020 and filed as Document 24 in American Video Duplicating, Inc, et al. v. Citigroup Inc., et al., No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The order addresses the application of Thomas V. Panoff of Mayer Brown LLP to appear on behalf of Defendants Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A. It records Bronwyn F. Pollock of Mayer Brown LLP as designated Local Counsel. The court's checkbox form marks the application as granted and directs that the application fee not be refunded. The document is on the court's G-64 order form and runs two pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

No. 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR · Doc. 24 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

      Case 2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR                             Document 24             Filed 05/18/20             Page 1 of 2 Page ID
 BRONWYN F. POLLOCK (SBN 210912) #:92
  bpollock@mayerbrown.com
 350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503
 Telephone: (213) 229-9500
 Facsimile: (213) 625-0248
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
 American Video Duplicating, Inc, et al.                                    CASE NUMBER

                                                             Plaintiff(s)                   2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR
                                v.
 Citigroup Inc., et al.                                                          ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-
                                                                               RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A
                                                         Defendant(s).           SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE [16]
The Court, having determined whether the required fee has been paid, and having reviewed the Application of
Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice filed by
  Panoff, Thomas V.                                                                   of    MAYER BROWN LLP
  Applicant’s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial                                  71 S. Wacker Drive
  (312) 701-8821                              (312) 706-8297                                Chicago, IL 60606
  Telephone Number                            Fax Number
  tpanoff@mayerbrown.com
                                 E-Mail Address                                             Firm/Agency Name & Address
for permission to appear and participate in this case on behalf of
  Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A.


  Name(s) of Party(ies) Represent                                     ☐ Plaintiff(s) ☒ Defendant(s) ☐ Other:
and designating as Local Counsel
  Bronwyn F. Pollock                                                                   of    MAYER BROWN LLP
  Designee’s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial                                    350 S. GRAND AVE., 25TH Floor
  210912                               213 229 5194                   213 576 8138           Los Angeles, CA 90071
   Designee’s Cal. Bar No.             Telephone Number               Fax Number
  bpollock@mayerbrown.com
                                  E-Mail Address                                             Firm/Agency Name & Address
HEREBY ORDERS THAT the Application be:
  ☒GRANTED
  ☐DENIED:                ☐    for failure to pay the required fee.
                          ☐    for failure to attach a Certificate of Good Standing issued within 30 days prior to filing of Application.
                          ☐    for failure to complete Application:
                          ☐    pursuant to L.R. 83-2.1.3.2: ☐Applicant resides in California; ☐ previous Applications listed indicate Applicant
                               is regularly employed or engaged in business, professional, or other similar activities in California.
                          ☐    pursuant to L.R. 83-2.1.3.4; Local Counsel: ☐ is not member of Bar of this Court; ☐ does not maintain office
                               District.
                          ☐ because
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Application fee, if paid: ☐ be refunded ☒ not be refunded.


                                                                                     U.S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge
 G-64 Order (05/16)       (PROPOSED) ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE                Page 1 of 1
Dated: May 18, 2020
    Case  2:20-cv-03815-ODW-AGR                     Document 24            Filed 05/18/20          Page 2 of 2 Page ID
                                                          #:93




G-64 Order (05/16)   (PROPOSED) ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE   Page 1 of 1


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cacd.780998.24.0.pdf
Size
110,802 bytes
SHA-256
237356cfd560fe16c2b42097877eac4f79e520934c99e87dca67155d4fa20fa3
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cacd.780998.24.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top