Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Setting Initial Case — Benworth Capital Partners, LLC v. Oto Analytics, LLC, No.…

Order Setting Initial Case — Benworth Capital Partners, LLC v. Oto Analytics, LLC, No. 3:24-cv-04840

Date
2024-08-08

Source document: Order Setting Initial Case; document type: Initial case management scheduling order with ADR deadlines.

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS,
LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.

OTO ANALYTICS, LLC F/K/A OTO
ANALYTICS, INC. D/B/A WOMPLY,
Defendant.
Case No. 24-cv-04840-LB

ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND ADR DEADLINES

This action is assigned to the Honorable Laurel Beeler.
Service of documents. When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or
removing defendant must serve on all other parties a copy of this order and the supplementary
material specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2.
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This case has been randomly assigned to a magistrate
judge, who, with written consent of all parties, may conduct all proceedings in a case, including
all pretrial and trial proceedings, entry of judgment and post-trial motions, with appeal directly to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See “Consenting to the Jurisdiction of a
Magistrate Judge” on the Court’s webpage at www.cand.uscourts.gov for more information.
Plaintiff or the removing party must complete and file the attached form “Consent or
Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction” (also available at www.cand.uscourts.gov/forms)
within 14 days of case initiation, and all other parties must do so within 14 days of appearing in
the case, or as otherwise ordered by the Clerk or magistrate judge.
Availability of Alternative Dispute Resolution. This action is assigned to the
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3.
Counsel and clients shall familiarize themselves with that rule and with the material entitled
“Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California” on the Court’s ADR
webpage at www.cand.uscourts.gov/adr.
Important case management dates. Counsel must comply with the dates listed below
unless the judge otherwise orders.

Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 5     Filed 08/08/24     Page 1 of 3

Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference & ADR Deadlines — Page 2
Case Management Event
Deadline
File Certification of Conflicts and Interested Entities or Persons.
(See Civil L.R. 3-15)
Upon first appearance
(supplement as necessary)
Deadline to file ADR Certification.
(See ADR L.R. 3)
10/17/2024
Deadline to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement,
ADR process selection, and discovery plan.
(See F.R. Civ. P. 26(f))
10/17/2024
Deadline to make initial disclosures.
(See F.R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1))
10/31/2024
Deadline to file Joint Case Management Statement.
(See Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of
California)
10/31/2024
Initial Case Management Conference location: To be held by Zoom.
Go to cand.uscourts.gov/lb for Zoom link.
11/7/2024 at 11:00 AM
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 5     Filed 08/08/24     Page 2 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS,
LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.

OTO ANALYTICS, LLC F/K/A OTO
ANALYTICS, INC. D/B/A WOMPLY,
Defendant.
Case No. 24-cv-04840-LB

CONSENT OR DECLINATION
TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JURISDICTION

INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate below by checking one of the two boxes whether you (if you
are the party) or the party you represent (if you are an attorney in the case) choose(s) to consent
or decline to magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. Sign this form below your selection.

☐ CONSENT to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I voluntarily consent to have a
United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and
entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

OR

☐ DECLINE Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I decline to have a United States
magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case and I hereby request that this case be
reassigned to a United States district judge.

DATE:

NAME:

Signature or “/s/”

COUNSEL FOR
(OR “PRO SE”):

Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 5     Filed 08/08/24     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.433897.5.0.pdf
Size
169,013 bytes
SHA-256
25d275b309cabc8ecc1b05313b5d076dc2d391058a791251ec8a16c8624104dd
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.433897.5.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top