Court filing
Refund Status re 35 Application for Refund Declined. (rgh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2024) — Benworth Oto (Dkt. 36)
Summary
A one-page Pay.gov application for refund filed by Benworth's counsel, Simon S. Grille, in Case 3:24-cv-04840-AMO, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, filed 09/12/24 as Documents 35 and 36. It says that when the petition to vacate the arbitration award was filed on 8/7/2024 with the $405.00 filing fee, a duplicate charge of $405.00 was added to the firm's credit card the same day, and asks for a refund. The court-use section marks the request denied at 4:21 pm, Sep 12, 2024, with a note to resubmit an amended application. The form concerns only the fee.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed August 7, 2024 in Benworth Oto; one of 100 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-08-07 |
Cite this document
“Refund Status re 35 Application for Refund Declined. (rgh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2024) — Benworth Oto (Dkt. 36).”
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:24-cv-04840-AMO, Doc. 35, filed 2024-08-07. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-benworth-oto-cand-433897/2024-08-07-gov-uscourts-cand-433897-36-0-gov-uscourts-cand-433897-36-0/
, SHA-256 9a63c005d6ee9812ef86c163fb2d7767ac5a2f756d5dff38d8c0f5be26d93f90.Full text
CAND Pay.gov Application for Refund (rev. 2/2023) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA APPLICATION FOR REFUND (USDC-CAND PAY.GOV) 9 Efile this form using OTHER FILINGS ˢ OTHER DOCUMENTS ˢ APPLICATION FOR REFUND. View detailed instructions at: cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/payments. For assistance, contact the ECF Help Desk at 1-866-638-7829 or ecfhelpdesk@cand.uscourts.gov Monday -Friday 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. PAY.GOV TRANSACTION DETAILS IMPORTANT: Complete all required fields (shown in red*); otherwise, your request may be denied and require resubmission. In fields 3-6, enter the information for the incorrect transaction (the one for which you are requesting a refund), not the correct transaction that appears on the docket. This information can be found in the Pay.gov screen receipt or confirmation email. 1. Your Name:* 7. Your Phone Number: 2. Your Email Address: * 8. Full Case Number (if applicable): PK Receipt Agency Tracking IDWG 9. Fee Type:* Attorney Admission Civil Case Filing Audio Recording Notice of Appeal Pro Hac Vice Writ of Habeas Corpus 4. Transaction Date:* 5. Transaction Time:* 6. Transaction Amount (Amount to be refunded):* 10. Reason for Refund Request:* Explain in detail what happened to cause duplicate charges or no fee required. For a duplicate charge, provide the correct receipt number in this field. If you paid a filing fee in an abandoned case number, note that case number here (but e-file the refund request in the open case). FOR U.S. DISTRICT COURT USE ONLY Refund request: Approved Denied Denied ņ Resubmit amended application (see reason for denial) Approval/denial date: Request approved/denied Ey: Pay.gov refund tracking ID refunded: Agency refund tracking ID number: Date refund processed: Refund processed bóW Reason for denial (if applicable): Referred for OSC date (if applicable): Reset Form Simon S. Grille (415) 981-4800 sgrille@girardsharp.com 3:24-cv-04840 ACANDC-19703607 08/07/2024 8:24 pm ✔ $ 405.00 On 8/7/2024, we filed the Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award and paid the $405.00 filing fee: Correct Tracking ID, BCANDC-19703607, Pay.gov Tracking ID: 27GO69KH. A duplicate charge of $405.00 was added to our credit card the same day, 8/7/2024, Agency Tracking ID: ACANDC-19703607, Pay.gov Tracking ID: 27GO698K. Thank you. Case 3:24-cv-04840-AMO Document 35 Filed 09/12/24 Page 1 of 1 Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO Document 36 Filed 09/12/24 Page 1 of 1 Please explain in detail what happened that caused the duplicate charge in section 10. [DENIED ] By Ana Banares at 4:21 pm, Sep 12, 2024
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.433897.36.0.pdf
- Size
- 2,027,828 bytes
- SHA-256
- 9a63c005d6ee9812ef86c163fb2d7767ac5a2f756d5dff38d8c0f5be26d93f90
- Original
- PACER (login required)