Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Benworth Capital Partners, LLC v. Oto Analytics, LLC Administrative Motion to Seal — Benworth Capital Partners, LLC v. OTO Analytics, LLC d/b/a Womply (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-04840)

Court filing

Administrative Motion to Seal — Benworth Capital Partners, LLC v. OTO Analytics, LLC d/b/a Womply (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-04840)

Filed August 7, 2024 in Benworth v. Oto Analytics; one of 2 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Filed2024-08-07

U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · No. 4:24-cv-04840-AMO · Doc. 3 · 2024-08-07 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Daniel C. Girard (State Bar No. 114826) 
dgirard@girardsharp.com 
Simon S. Grille (State Bar No. 294914) 
sgrille@girardsharp.com  
GIRARD SHARP LLP  
601 California Street, Suite 1400  
San Francisco, CA 94108  
Telephone: (415) 981-4800 
Jorge L. Piedra (Florida Bar No. 88315) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
jpiedra@kttlaw.com  
Dwayne A. Robinson (Florida Bar No. 99976) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
drobinson@kttlaw.com  
Michael R. Lorigas (Florida Bar No. 123597) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
mlorigas@kttlaw.com  
KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON  
2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor  
Miami, Florida 33134  
Telephone: 305-372-1800 
Attorneys for Benworth Capital Partners, LLC 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, 
Petitioner, 
 
v. 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC f/k/a OTO 
ANALYTICS, INC. d/b/a WOMPLY, 
Respondent. 
Case No. 3:24-cv-4840
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER 
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL 
SHOULD BE SEALED 
N.D. Cal. L.R. 7-11 and 79-5
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 3     Filed 08/07/24     Page 1 of 7

1 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TO THE COURT, THE PARTIES, AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: 
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Petitioner Benworth Capital Partners, LLC (“Benworth”) will 
and hereby does move the Court to consider whether Benworth’s Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration 
Award and accompanying Appendix, which contains certain material designated as “Confidential” or 
that otherwise disclose potentially confidential, proprietary, or private information, should be sealed. 
Benworth files this motion to comply with Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, as well as the Stipulated 
Protective Order entered in the underlying arbitration and the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules 
and Procedures, which governed the arbitration. 
Material To Be Filed Under Seal 
This is an action to vacate an arbitral award. The arbitration was governed by the JAMS 
Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures. JAMS Rule 26(a) provides that “JAMS and the 
Arbitrator shall maintain the confidential nature of the Arbitration proceeding and the Award, including 
the Hearing, except as necessary in connection with a judicial challenge to or enforcement of an Award, 
or unless otherwise required by law or judicial decision.” In addition, Paragraph 12.3 of the Stipulated 
Protective Order entered in the arbitration requires materials designated as “Confidential” (i.e., 
“Protected Material”) to be filed under seal. “Protected Material” includes information (regardless of 
how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible thing that contain trade secrets, proprietary 
business information, competitively sensitive information, personally sensitive or private information, 
or any other information, documents, or testimony not previously disclosed to the public. See Stipulated 
Protective Order, ¶¶ 2.2, 2.5, & 2.12.  
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5(f), Benworth submits this Administrative Motion 
because its Petition and accompanying Appendix contain certain information that Respondent Oto 
Analytics, LLC f/k/a Oto Analytics, Inc., d/b/a Womply (“Womply”) has claimed or may claim is 
confidential. Womply has the burden to justify its claims of confidentiality and to establish that the 
designated information is sealable. Civ. L.R. 79-5(f)(3) & (c)(1). In the interim, Benworth is 
provisionally submitting the following information under seal: 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 3     Filed 08/07/24     Page 2 of 7

 
2 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER  
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Document 
Description 
Page/Line Nos. 
Petition 
Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration 
Award 
12:4-13; 
12:26-27; 
13:6-8; 
13:12-21; 13:23-14:8; 14:9-14; 
17:14-18:15; 
18:27-19:8; 
21:13-23:24; 29:7-11; 33:19-
39:5; 
42:18-19; 
42:27-28; 
44:19-21; 45:25-28; 47:4-5; 
48:9-11; 49:6-11; 50:10-11; 
53:17-54:5; 55:16-21; 59:10-
11; 64:2-11; 64:15-18; 65:26-
27; 66:6-7. 
Appendix 
Oto Analytics, Inc. dba Worn ply vs. 
Benworth Capital Partners, LLC Case 
No. 1210038203 Docket Sheet 
App.5-22 
Appendix 
Letter to Arbitrator Brainerd Re Summary 
Disposition 
App.80-121 
Appendix 
Letter from Jorge L. Piedra to Arbitrator 
Brainerd in response to replies from 
Claimant 
App.122-261 
Appendix 
Order Re: Womply’s Emergency Request 
to Disclose Protected Materials and 
Womply’s Motion to Produce (Order No. 
5) 
App.262-65 
Appendix 
Joint Rule 20(A) Pre-Hearing Submission 
App.266-302 
Appendix 
Letter from Jorge L. Piedra to Arbitrator 
Brainerd re: update on determination of 
SBA 
App.303-04 
Appendix 
Letter Re: Disqualification of Arbitrator 
Brainerd 
App.305-327 
Appendix 
Benworth Capital Partners, LLC’s Pre-
Hearing Brief 
App.328-48 
Appendix 
Womply’s Rule 20(B) Pre-Hearing Brief 
App.349-96 
Appendix 
Arbitration Hearing Transcript Day 1 
App.397-760 
Appendix 
Arbitration Hearing Transcript Day 2 
App.761-1119 
Appendix 
Arbitration Hearing Transcript Day 3 
App.1120-1410 
Appendix 
Arbitration Hearing Transcript Day 4 
App.1411-1680 
Appendix 
Arbitration Hearing Transcript Day 5 
App.1681-2025 
Appendix 
Arbitration Hearing Transcript Day 6 
App.2026-2344 
Appendix 
Arbitration Hearing Transcript Day 7 
App.2345-2571 
Appendix 
Respondent/Counter-Claimant 
Benworth Capital Partners, LLC’s Post-
Hearing Brief 
App.2572-2615 
Appendix 
Womply’s Post-Hearing Brief 
App.2616-61 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 3     Filed 08/07/24     Page 3 of 7

 
3 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER  
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Document 
Description 
Page/Line Nos. 
Appendix 
Respondent/Counter-Claimant Benworth 
Capital Partners, LLC’s Response to 
Womply’s Post-Hearing Brief 
App.2662-80 
Appendix 
Arbitration Hearing Transcript Closing 
Arguments 
App.2681-2877 
Appendix 
Benworth's Motion to Stay 
App.2878-84 
Appendix 
Benworth’s Reply in Support of Motion to 
Stay 
App.2885-93 
Appendix 
Order Re Benworth's Motion to Stay 
Order No. 7 
App.2894 
Appendix 
Letter from A. Cheney to Arbitrator 
Brainerd Re Letter from the SBA 
App.2895-98 
Appendix 
Letter from Dwayne A. Robinson to 
Arbitrator Brainerd re: Third SBA 
Extension 
App.2899-2901 
Appendix 
Interim Award 
App.2902-56 
Appendix 
Benworth's Motion for Reconsideration 
App.2957-3037 
Appendix 
Benworth's Reply in Support of Motion 
for Reconsideration 
App.3038-53 
Appendix 
Order Re Benworth's Motion for 
Reconsideration and Further Proceedings 
- Order No. 8 
App.3054-61 
Appendix 
Benworth’s Response to Womply’s 
Motion for Benworth to Deposit Funds 
into an Escrow Account 
App.3062-3111 
Appendix 
Final Award 
App.3112-84 
Appendix 
Corrected Final Award 
App.3185-3257 
Appendix 
2/14/2021 Email from T. Scammell to M. 
Roth re PPP Fast Lane (JX030) 
App.3869-3914 
Appendix 
2/19/2021 Email from C. Capoccia to B. 
Navarro re Intro call: Womply and 
Benworth with attached Womply PPP 
Fast Lane with attachment (JX032) 
App.3915-25 
Appendix 
2/25/2021 Email from Bernie Navarro to 
Cory Capoccia re Agreement with 
attachments with attachment (JX035) 
App.3926-54 
Appendix 
3/18/2021 Email from Connie Spencer-
Adams to Toya De La Cruz re: Applying 
through Womply (JX060) 
App.3957-59 
Appendix 
4/15/2021 Email from Cory Capoccia to 
Bernie Navarro re Womply – Benworth 
countersigned agreement with attachment 
(JX123) 
App.3974-88 
Appendix 
11/30/2022 T. Scammell Decl. (JX323) 
App.3992-4000 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 3     Filed 08/07/24     Page 4 of 7

 
4 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER  
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Document 
Description 
Page/Line Nos. 
Appendix 
Video showing Womply PPP Application 
Process (JX337) 
App.4001 
Appendix 
Video showing Womply PPP Fast Lane 
(JX338) 
App.4002 
Appendix 
Womply Master Developer Agreement 
(JX339) 
App.4003 
Appendix 
Womply technology platform borrower-
facing screenshots (JX340) 
App.4015-17 
Appendix 
Screenshot of PPP loan application page 
(JX345) 
App.4018 
Appendix 
Screenshot of PPP loan application page 
(JX346) 
App.4019 
Appendix 
Womply Disclaimer re: Tax Documents 
Qualification Issue (JX355) 
App.4020 
Appendix 
Womply PPP Program - 03. Training - 
3.06 Application Process (JX356) 
App.4021 
Appendix 
12/8/2022 SBA Letter (JX374) 
App.4022-23 
 
 
None of the materials in the above chart have been designated as confidential by Benworth. 
Benworth takes no position as this time on whether any of these designated portions satisfy the 
requirements for sealing, and specifically reserves the right to challenge any designation under the 
Stipulated Protective Order as well as the propriety of sealing any of these materials under Civil Local 
Rule 79-5 and applicable law. 
 
In compliance with Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, the following attachments accompany this 
motion: 
1. 
The declaration in support of this Motion; 
2. 
A proposed order that lists in the table format each document to be sealed; 
3. 
Unredacted version of Benworth’s Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration Award; 
4. 
Unredacted versions of each Appendix item listed in the above chart. 
 
Dated: August 7, 2024 
Respectfully submitted, 
/s/ Michael R. Lorigas  
 
 
Jorge L. Piedra (Florida Bar No. 88315) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
jpiedra@kttlaw.com  
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 3     Filed 08/07/24     Page 5 of 7

 
5 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER  
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dwayne A. Robinson (Florida Bar No. 99976) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
drobinson@kttlaw.com  
Michael R. Lorigas (Florida Bar No. 123597) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
mlorigas@kttlaw.com  
KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON  
2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor  
Miami, Florida 33134  
Telephone: 305-372-1800   
 
Daniel C. Girard (State Bar No. 114826) 
dgirard@girardsharp.com 
Simon S. Grille (State Bar No. 294914) 
sgrille@girardsharp.com  
GIRARD SHARP LLP  
601 California Street, Suite 1400  
San Francisco, CA 94108  
Telephone: (415) 981-4800  
 
 
Attorneys for Benworth Capital Partners, LLC 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 3     Filed 08/07/24     Page 6 of 7

 
6 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER  
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) 
I, Simon S. Grille, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file 
this Petitioner’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed 
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in this filing has been 
obtained from counsel. 
 
/s/ Simon S. Grille 
 
 
Simon S. Grille 
 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 3     Filed 08/07/24     Page 7 of 7

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.433897.3.0.pdf
Size
201,453 bytes
SHA-256
b863a6702e4bcbdb6aca1b22083ca7a1f2edd9d87b7bfac93935348c7c1bacf5
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.433897.3.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top