Court filing
Government's Response to the Defendant's Motion for Relief Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 821 — United States v. Felicia Stanley (N.D. Fla.)
Filed January 17, 2024 in U.S. v. Felicia Stanley; one of 15 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-01-17 |
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division · No. 4:22-cr-00032-MW-MAF · Doc. 89 · 2024-01-17 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
Case No. 4:22cr32/MW
FELICIA JACKSON STANLEY
___________________________________
GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
RELIEF UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) AND AMENDMENT 821
Comes now the United States of America, by and through the undersigned
Assistant United States Attorney, and files this response to Stanley’s January 2,
2024, motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Sentencing Guidelines
Amendment 821.
When the Court originally sentenced Stanley, Stanley’s total offense level
was 21, Stanley had zero criminal history points and her criminal history category
was I, and Stanley’s guideline range was 37 to 46 months imprisonment. (Doc. 68,
¶¶ 48, 52-53, 90; Doc. 76 - Pg. 1 -- that is, the statement of reasons, the docket
sheet reflects the SOR is Doc. 76, the SOR’s header says Doc. 75). The
government did not file a substantial assistance motion on Stanley’s behalf. (Doc.
76). The Court varied downward and sentenced Stanley to three concurrent 24-
month terms of imprisonment. (Doc. 75). Amendment 821 lowers Stanley’s total
offense level to 19. U.S.S.G. Amend. 821; U.S.S.G. § 4C1.1(a) (November 1,
Case 4:22-cr-00032-MW-MAF Document 89 Filed 01/17/24 Page 1 of 3
2
2023). At total offense level 19, criminal history category I, Stanley’s new
guideline range is 30-37 months imprisonment. U.S.S.G. § 5A.
Except in cases of substantial assistance, a district court reducing a sentence
under § 3582(c)(2) may not reduce a defendant’s sentence “to a term that is less
than the minimum of the amended guidelines range.” Dillon v. United States, 560
U.S. 812, 819, 822, 827-31 (quoting U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A)). Accordingly, if
a defendant has already been sentenced below her new, amended guidelines range
she is not eligible for relief. Id. In the present case, Stanley has already been
sentenced below her new, amended guidelines range and is not eligible for relief.1
Accordingly, the Court should deny Stanley’s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) and Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 821.
Respectfully submitted,
JASON R. COODY
United States Attorney
s/ Robert G. Davies
Robert G. Davies
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Florida Bar No. 704301
21 East Garden Street, Suite 400
Pensacola, Florida 32502
(850) 444-4000
1 As is set forth in the attached January 9, 2024, memoradum, the United States
Probation office agrees with this conclusion
Case 4:22-cr-00032-MW-MAF Document 89 Filed 01/17/24 Page 2 of 3
3
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH N.D. FLA. LOC. R. 7.1(F)
I hereby certify that this response complies with the word limitation set forth
in N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(F). This response contains 363 words.
s/ Robert G. Davies
Robert G. Davies
Assistant U.S. Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to Felicia
Jackson Stanley, SPC Aliceville, P.O. Box 487, Aliceville, AL 35442 this the 17th
day of January, 2024.
s/ Robert G. Davies
Robert G. Davies
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Case 4:22-cr-00032-MW-MAF Document 89 Filed 01/17/24 Page 3 of 3File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flnd.433859.89.0.pdf
- Size
- 86,997 bytes
- SHA-256
- 3be770036fd24e2bc6c216de142b4faf3752850ca0ddda96fccbe8a6407388f1
- Original
- PACER (login required)