Plea Agreement — United States v. Jordan

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division · No. 1:24-cr-00304-SDG · Doc. 3-1 · 2024-10-10 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

FILED IN OPEN COURT 
U.S.D.C. - Atlanta 
OCT 1 0 2024 
KEVIN P. WEIMER, Clerk 
GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEME~~ 
DeputyC~rk 
United States Attorney 
Northern District of Georgia 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
CRIMINAL NO. l:24-CR-304 
The United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia ("the 
Government") and Defendant Boeroepae Jordan enter into this plea agreement as 
set forth below in Part IV pursuant to Rules ll(c)(l)(A) & (B) of the Federal Rules 
of Criminal Procedure. Boeroepae Jordan, Defendant, having received a copy of 
the above-numbered Information and having been arraigned, hereby pleads 
GUILTY to Counts 1 and 2. 
I. ADMISSION OF GUILT 
1. The Defendant admits that he is pleading guilty because he is in fact guilty 
of the crime(s) charged in Counts 1 and 2. 
II. ACKNOWLEDGMENT & WAIVER OF RIGHTS 
2. The Defendant understands that by pleading guilty, he is giving up the 
right to plead not guilty and the right to be tried by a jury. At a trial, the 
Defendant would have the right to an attorney, and if the Defendant could not 
afford an attorney, the Court would appoint one to represent the Defendant at 
trial and at every stage of the proceedings. During the trial, the Defendant would 
be presumed innocent and the Government would have the burden of proving 
him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The Defendant would have the right to 
confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him. If the Defendant wished, 
he could testify on his own behalf and present evidence in his defense, and he 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 1 of 20

could subpoena witnesses to testify on his behalf. If, however, the Defendant did 
not wish to testify, that fact could not be used against him, and the Government 
could not compel him to incriminate himself. If the Defendant were found guilty 
after a trial, he would have the right to appeal the conviction. 
3. The Defendant understands that by pleading guilty, he is giving up all of 
these rights and there will not be a trial of any kind. 
4. By pleading guilty, the Defendant also gives up any and all rights to pursue 
any affirmative defenses, Fourth Amendment or.Fifth Amendment claims, and 
other pretrial motions that have been filed or could have been filed. 
5. The Defendant also understands that he ordinarily would have the right to 
appeal his sentence and, under some circumstances, to attack the conviction and 
sentence in post-conviction proceedings. By entering this Plea Agreement, the 
Defendant may be waiving some or all of those rights to appeal and to 
collaterally attack his conviction and sentence, as specified below. 
6. Finally, the Defendant understands that, to plead guilty, he may have to 
answer, under oath, questions posed to him by the Court concerning the rights 
that he is giving up and the facts of this case, and the Defendant's answers, if 
untruthful, may later be used against him in a prosecution for perjury or false 
statements. 
III. 
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PENAL TIES 
7. The Defendant understands that, based on his plea of guilty, he will be 
subject to the following maximum and mandatory minimum penalties: 
As to Count 1 (18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2) 
a. Maximum term of imprisonment: 20 years. 
2 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 2 of 20

b. Mandatory minimum term of imprisonment: None. 
c. Term of supervised release: 0 year(s) to 3 years. 
d. Maximum fine: $250,000.00, or twice the gain or twice the loss, 
whichever is greatest, due and payable immediately. 
e. Full restitution, due and payable immediately, to all victims of the 
offense(s) and relevant conduct. 
f. Mandatory special assessment: $100.00, due and payable 
immediately. 
g. Forfeiture of any and all property constituting, or derived from, 
proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of this offense. 
As to Count 2 (18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2) 
a. Maximum term of imprisonment: 30 years. 
b. Mandatory minimum term of imprisonment: None. 
c. Term of supervised release: 0 year(s) to 5 years. 
d. Maximum fine: $1,000,000.00, or twice the gain or twice the loss, 
whichever is greatest, due and payable immediately. 
e. Full restitution, due and payable immediately, to all victims of the 
offense(s) and relevant conduct. 
f. Mandatory special assessment: $100.00, due and payable 
immediately. 
g. Forfeiture of any and all property constituting, or derived from, 
proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of this offense. 
3 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 3 of 20

8. The Defendant understands that, before imposing sentence in this case, the 
Court will be required to consider, among other factors, the provisions of the 
United States Sentencing Guidelines and that, under certain circumstances, the 
Court has the discretion to depart from those Guidelines. The Defendant further 
understands that the Court may impose a sentence up to and including the 
statutory maximum as set forth in the above paragraph and that no one can 
predict his exact sentence at this time. 
9. REMOVAL FROM THE UNITED STATES: The Defendant recognizes that 
pleading guilty may have consequences with respect to his immigration status if 
he is not a citizen of the United States. Under federal law, a broad range of 
crimes are removable offenses, including the offense to which the Defendant is 
pleading guilty. Indeed, because the Defendant is pleading guilty to this offense, 
removal is presumptively mandatory. Removal and other immigration 
consequences are the subject of a separate proceeding, however, and the 
Defendant understands that no one, including his attorney or the District Court, 
can predict to a certainty the effect of his conviction on his immigration status. 
The Defendant nevertheless affirms that he wants to plead guilty regardless of 
any immigration consequences that his plea may entail, even if the consequence 
is his automatic removal from the United States. 
IV. 
PLEA AGREEMENT 
10. The Defendant, his counsel, and the Government, subject to approval by 
the Court, have agreed upon a negotiated plea in this case, the terms of which are 
as follows: 
4 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 4 of 20

No Additional Charges 
11. The United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia agrees not 
to bring further criminal charges against the Defendant related to the charges to 
which he is pleading guilty. The Defendant understands that this provision does 
not bar prosecution by any other federal, state, or local jurisdiction. 
Factual Basis 
12. 
The parties agree that if this case went to trial, the Government would 
prove by admissible evidence and beyond reasonable doubt the following facts: 
a. On June 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a term of 
incarceration of 72 months to be followed by six years of supervised 
release for possession of firearm by a prohibited person and 
possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime in Northern 
District of Georgia case number l:13-CR-238. On about September 9, 
2019, the Defendant was released from Federal Bureau of Prisons 
custody and began serving a six-year term of supervised release. 
b. On March 13, 2020, Defendant JORDAN caused his mother, DJ, to 
open a business checking account at Wells Fargo with an account 
number ending in 3397 ("WF 3397") for the company named A/E 
Multi-Diamond Entertainment Incorporated ("Multi-Diamond"). 
The application to open the account included multiple 
misrepresentations, including that DJ was the "sole owner" and 
"owner with control of the entity," and that Multi-Diamond had two 
locations, ten employees, and annual gross sales of $20,000. The 
Defendant's name was not listed on the account opening documents 
5 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 5 of 20

in order to conceal his control and ownership of Multi-Diamond and 
the funds that would transfer through the account. 
c. On April 5, 2020, the Defendant electronically submitted an online 
request to the U. S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") for an 
Economic Injury Disaster Loan ("EIDL") Advance of $5,000 for 
Multi-Diamond. On the request, the Defendant made multiple 
misrepresentations, including that Multi-Diamond had five 
employees, was opened on December 28, 1977, and was 51 % owned 
by the Defendant and 49% owned by DJ. The Defendant requested 
that the EIDL Advance be deposited into WF 3397. On May 1, 2020, 
as a result of the online request, the SBA transferred $5,000 into WF 
3397. At the time of this deposit, the balance of WF 3397 was only 
$30. 
d. On May 19, 2020, the Defendant electronically signed and submitted 
an online application for a $291,250 Paycheck Protection Program 
("PPP") loan for Multi-Diamond to Celtic Bank, which was a bank 
headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. The application included 
multiple misrepresentations, including that the purpose of the loan 
was payroll, lease/ mortgage interest, and utilities; Multi-Diamond 
had 18 employees and an average monthly payroll of $116,500; the 
Defendant was 100% owner of the business; Multi-Diamond was in 
operation on February 15, 2020; current economic uncertainty made 
this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of 
Multi-Diamond; the funds would be used to retain workers and 
6 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 6 of 20

maintain payroll or make mortgage interest payments, lease 
payments, and utility payments; and the information provided in 
the application and in all supporting documents and forms was true 
and accurate in all material respects, and knowingly making a false 
statement is punishable under the law. 
e. In support of the PPP application, the Defendant submitted a 
falsified IRS Form 941 for January, February, and March 2020 stating 
that, for those months in 2020, Multi-Diamond paid $349,500.09 of 
wages and other compensation to 18 employees. The Defendant also 
submitted a falsified account statement for WF 3397 dated February 
28, 2020. The checking statement listed an account balance of 
$424,504.41. 
f. However, Multi-Diamond was not a functioning business and did 
not have any employees. The Defendant had not filed the Form 941 
with the IRS. The WF 3397 business checking account did not exist 
until March 13, 2020, nor did it ever have an account balance as high 
as the one stated on the falsified checking statement. 
g. On May 19, 2020, the Defendant electronically signed and 
submitted, via the internet, a Promissory Note for SBA Loan 
Number ******7408 in the amount of $291,250. 
h. On May 20, 2020, as a result of the loan application and note signed 
by the Defendant, Celtic Bank transferred $291,250 into WF 3397. At 
the time of this deposit, the balance of WF 3397 was only $106.28. 
7 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 7 of 20

1. The following day, the Defendant started laundering the PPP funds 
by withdrawing them in cash and transferring them to accounts in 
other people's names to conceal where they were being kept and 
how they were being used. For example, the Defendant made large 
cash withdrawals on May 21 ($30,010) and 28 ($43,063), and June 4 
($9,000) and 9 ($17,272.40). The Defendant also made large transfers 
to other accounts on May 21 ($15,000), 22 ($9,000), 29 ($8,000), and 
June 3 ($30,000 and $9,000), 5 ($10,000), and 10 ($50,000). The 
Defendant also spent large amounts of the funds at restaurants, 
retail stores, nail salons, and furniture stores. By July 31, 2020, the 
balance of WF 3397 was only $4,718.16. 
Sentencing Guidelines Recommendations 
13. Based upon the evidence currently known to the Government, the 
Government agrees to make the following recommendations and/ or to enter into 
the following stipulations. 
As to Counts 1 and 2 
Base/ Adjusted Offense Level 
14. The Government agrees to recommend and the Defendant agrees that: 
a. The applicable offense guideline is Section 2Bl.1. 
b. The amount of loss resulting from the offense(s) of conviction and all 
relevant conduct is more than $250,000 but less than $550,000. 
Role in the Offense Adjustments 
15. The Government agrees to recommend and the Defendant agrees that the 
Defendant receive the 2-level upward adjustment pursuant to Section 3Bl.l(c) 
8 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 8 of 20

because the Defendant was an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor in 
criminal activity involving less than five participants. 
Obstruction and Related Adjustments 
16. The Government and the Defendant agree that the Defendant shall not 
receive an offense level adjustment increase pursuant to Section 3C1.1 for 
Obstruction or Impeding the Administration of Justice. 
Acceptance of Responsibility 
17. The Government will recommend that the Defendant receive an offense 
level adjustment for acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to Section 3E1.1, to 
the maximum extent authorized by the guideline. However, the Government will 
not be required to recommend acceptance of responsibility if, after entering this 
Plea Agreement, the Defendant engages in conduct inconsistent with accepting 
responsibility. Thus, by way of example only, should the Defendant falsely deny 
or falsely attempt to minimize the Defendant's involvement in relevant offense 
conduct, give conflicting statements about the Defendant's involvement, fail to 
pay the special assessment, fail to meet any of the obligations set forth in the 
Financial Cooperation Provisions set forth below, or participate in additional 
criminal conduct, including unlawful personal use of a controlled substance, the 
Government will not be required to recommend acceptance of responsibility. 
Right to Answer Questions, Correct Misstatements, 
and Make Recommendations 
18. The parties reserve the right to inform the Court and the Probation Office 
of all facts and circumstances regarding the Defendant and this case, and to 
- respond to any questions from the Court and the Probation Office and to correct 
9 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 9 of 20

any misstatements of fact or law. Except as expressly stated elsewhere in this 
Plea Agreement, the parties also reserve the right to make recommendations 
regarding the application of the Sentencing Guidelines. The parties understand, 
acknowledge, and agree that there are no agreements between the parties with 
respect to any Sentencing Guidelines issues other than those specifically listed. 
Right to Modify Recommendations 
19. With regard to the Government's recommendation as to any specific 
application of the Sentencing Guidelines as set forth elsewhere in this Plea 
Agreement, the Defendant understands and agrees that, should the Government 
obtain or receive additional evidence concerning the facts underlying any such 
recommendation, the Government will bring that evidence to the attention of the 
Court and the Probation Office. In addition, if the additional evidence is 
sufficient to support a finding of a different application of the Guidelines, the 
Government will not be bound to make the recommendation set forth elsewhere 
in this Plea Agreement, and the failure to do so will not constitute a violation of 
this Plea Agreement. 
Sentencing Recommendations 
Specific Sentence Recommendation 
20. Unless the Defendant engages in conduct inconsistent with accepting 
responsibility, as described more fully in paragraph 17, the parties agree to 
jointly recommend that the Defendant be sentenced to a term of incarceration at 
the low end of the adjusted guideline range to be followed by terms of 
supervised release of three years as to Count 1 and five years as to Count 2, to be 
served concurrently. 
10 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 10 of 20

21. Additionally, as a product of negotiation between the parties and in 
exchange for the Government not bringing otherwise provable charges against 
the Defendant, the Defendant and the Government expressly recommend that 
the Court should revoke the Defendant's supervised release in Criminal Action 
No. l:13-CR-238 and impose a revocation sentence of 24 months of 
imprisonment, to be served concurrently to the sentence of imprisonment 
imposed for the offenses charged in Counts 1 and 2 of the Information. 
Restitution 
22. The Defendant agrees to pay $323,433.31 as restitution, plus applicable 
interest, to the Clerk of Court for distribution to the following victims of the 
offense(s) to which he is pleading guilty and all relevant conduct, including, but 
not limited to, any counts dismissed as a result of this Plea Agreement: 
U.S. Small Business Administration 
$318,433.31 
Forfeiture 
23. The Defendant waives and abandons his interest in any property that may 
have been seized in connection with this case. The Defendant agrees to the 
administrative or judicial forfeiture or the abandonment of any seized property. 
The Defendant agrees to hold the United States and its agents and employees 
harmless from any claims made in connection with the seizure, forfeiture, or 
disposal of property connected to this case. The Defendant acknowledges that 
the United States will dispose of any seized property, and that such disposal may 
include, but is not limited to, the sale, release, or destruction of the seized 
property. The Defendant agrees to waive any and all constitutional, statutory, 
11 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 11 of 20

and equitable challenges in any manner (including direct appeal, habeas corpus, 
or any other means) to the seizure, forfeiture, and disposal of any property 
connected to this case on any grounds. 
24. The Defendant acknowledges that he is not entitled to use forfeited assets 
to satisfy any fine, restitution, cost of imprisonment, tax obligations, or any other 
penalty the Court may impose upon the Defendant in addition to forfeiture. 
Financial Cooperation Provisions 
Special Assessment 
25. The Defendant agrees that he will pay a special assessment in the amount 
of $200 by money order or certified check made payable to the Clerk of Court, 
U.S. District Court, 2211 U.S. Courthouse, 75 Ted Turner Drive SW, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303, by the day of sentencing. The Defendant agrees to provide proof 
of such payment to the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney upon 
payment thereof. 
Fine/Restitution -Terms of Payment 
26. The Defendant agrees to pay any fine and/ or restitution, plus applicable 
interest, imposed by the Court to the Clerk of Court for eventual disbursement to 
the appropriate account and/ or victim(s). The Defendant also agrees that the full 
fine and/ or restitution amount shall be considered due and payable 
immediately. If the Defendant cannot pay the full amount immediately and is 
placed in custody or under the supervision of the Probation Office at any time, 
he agrees that the custodial agency and the Probation Office will have the 
authority to establish payment schedules to ensure payment of the fine and/ or 
restitution. The Defendant understands that this payment schedule represents a 
12 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 12 of 20

minimum obligation and that, should the Defendant's financial situation 
establish that he is able to pay more toward the fine and/ or restitution, the 
Government is entitled to pursue other sources of recovery of the fine and/ or 
restitution. The Defendant further agrees to cooperate fully in efforts to collect 
the fine and/ or restitution obligation by any legal means the Government deems 
appropriate. Finally, the Defendant and his counsel agree that the Government 
may contact the Defendant regarding the collection of any fine and/ or restitution 
without notifying and outside the presence of his counsel. 
Financial Disclosure 
27. The Defendant agrees that the Defendant will not sell, hide, waste, 
encumber, destroy, or otherwise devalue any such asset worth more than $1,000 
before sentencing, without the prior approval of the Government. The Defendant 
understands and agrees that the Defendant's failure to comply with this 
provision of the Plea Agreement should result in the Defendant receiving no 
credit for acceptance of responsibility. 
28. The Defendant agrees to cooperate fully in the investigation of the amount 
of forfeiture, restitution, and fine; the identification of funds and assets in which 
he has any legal or equitable interest to be applied toward forfeiture, restitution, 
and/ or fine; and the prompt payment of restitution or a fine. 
29. The Defendant's cooperation obligations include: (A) fully and truthfully 
completing the Department of Justice's Financial Statement of Debtor form, and 
any addenda to said form deemed necessary by the Government, within ten days 
of the change of plea hearing; (B) submitting to a financial deposition or 
interview (should the Government deem it necessary) prior to sentencing 
13 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 13 of 20

regarding the subject matter of said form; (C) providing any documentation 
within his possession or control requested by the Government regarding his 
financial condition and that of his household; (D) fully and truthfully answering 
all questions regarding his past and present financial condition and that of his 
household in such interview(s); and (E) providing a waiver of his privacy 
protections to permit the Government to access his credit report and tax 
information held by the Internal Revenue Service. 
30. So long as the Defendant is completely truthful, the Government agrees 
that anything related by the Defendant during his financial interview or 
deposition or in the financial forms described above cannot and will not be used 
against him in the Government's criminal prosecution. However, the 
Government may use the Defendant's statements to identify and to execute upon 
assets to be applied to the fine and/ or restitution in this case. Further, the 
Government is completely free to pursue any and all investigative leads derived 
in any way from the interview(s)/ deposition(s)/financial forms, which could 
result in the acquisition of evidence admissible against the Defendant in 
subsequent proceedings. If the Defendant subsequently takes a position in any 
legal proceeding that is inconsistent with the 
interview(s)/ deposition(s)/financial forms-whether in pleadings, oral argument, 
witness testimony, documentary evidence, questioning of witnesses, or any other 
manner-the Government may use the Defendant's 
interview(s)/ deposition(s)/ financial forms, and all evidence obtained directly or 
indirectly therefrom, in any responsive pleading and argument and for cross-
examination, impeachment, or rebuttal evidence. Further, the Government may 
14 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 14 of 20

also use the Defendant's interview(s) / deposition(s) / financial forms to respond 
to arguments made or issues raised sua sponte by the Magistrate or District 
Court. 
Guidelines Sentence Is Reasonable 
31. The parties agree that there exists no aggravating or mitigating 
circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by 
the U.S. Sentencing Commission in formulating the Sentencing Guidelines 
justifying a departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2. The parties agree not to request 
any sentence outside of the Guidelines range. The parties further agree that a 
sentence within the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range is reasonable under 
the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Neither party will request any variance 
resulting in a sentence outside of the Guidelines range. 
Recommendations/Stipulations Non-binding 
32. The Defendant understands and agrees that the recommendations of the 
Government incorporated within this Plea Agreement, as well as any 
stipulations of fact or guideline computations incorporated within this Plea 
Agreement or otherwise discussed between the parties, are not binding on the 
Court and that the Court's failure to accept one or more of the recommendations, 
stipulations, and/ or guideline computations will not constitute grounds to 
withdraw his guilty plea or to claim a breach of this Plea Agreement. 
Limited Waiver of Appeal 
33. LIMITED W AIYER OF APPEAL: To the maximum extent permitted by 
federal law, the Defendant voluntarily and expressly waives the right to appeal 
his conviction and sentence and the right to collaterally attack his conviction and 
15 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 15 of 20

sentence in any post-conviction proceeding (including, but not limited to, 
motions filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255) on any ground, except that the 
Defendant may file a direct appeal of an upward departure or upward variance 
above the sentencing guideline range as calculated by the District Court. Claims 
that the Defendant's counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance are 
excepted from this waiver. The Defendant understands that this Plea Agreement 
does not limit the Government's right to appeal, but if the Government initiates a 
direct appeal of the sentence imposed, the Defendant may file a cross-appeal of 
that same sentence. 
Miscellaneous Waivers 
FOIA/Privacy Act Waiver 
34. The Defendant hereby waives all rights, whether asserted directly or by a 
representative, to request or receive from any department or agency of the 
United States any records pertaining to the investigation or prosecution of this 
case, including, without limitation, any records that may be sought under the 
Freedom of Information Act, Title 5, United States Code, Section 552, or the 
Privacy Act of 1974, Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a. 
16 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 16 of 20

No Other Agreements 
35. There are no other agreements, promises, representations, or 
understandings between the Defendant and the Government. 
1n7117;;/
1
" ctayof 0c¼,6H 
SIGNATURE (D:tdant' s Attorney) 
-S---+~-G_N_A_T 
__ R~E~(D~e-~..,...e1~1.d_a_n-t) 
___ _ 
Paul S. Kish 
Boeroepae Jordan 
SIGNATURE{ssistant U.S. Attorney) 
Garrett L. Bradford 
SIGNATURE (~tant U.S. Attorney) 
Erin N. Spritzer 
SIGNATURE (Approving Official) 
Stephen H. McClain 
17 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 17 of 20

I have read the Information against me and have discussed it with my 
attorney. I understand the charges and the elements of each charge that the 
Government would have to prove to convict me at a trial. I have read the 
foregoing Plea Agreement and have carefully reviewed every part of it with my 
attorney. I understand the terms and conditions contained in the Plea 
Agreement, and I voluntarily agree to them. I also have discussed with my 
attorney the rights I may have to appeal or challenge my conviction and 
sentence, and I understand that the appeal waiver contained in the Plea 
Agreement will prevent me, with the narrow exceptions stated, from appealing 
my conviction and sentence or challenging my conviction and sentence in any 
post-conviction proceeding. No one has threatened or forced me to plead guilty, 
and no promises or inducements have been made to me other than those 
discussed in the Plea Agreement. The discussions between my attorney and the 
Government toward reaching a negotiated plea in this case took place with my 
permission. I am fully satisfied with the representation provided to me by my 
attorney in this case. 
SIGNATIJE{Defendant) 
Boeroepae Jordan 
18 
DATE 
I 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 18 of 20

I am Boeroepae Jordan's lawyer. I have carefully reviewed the charges and 
the Plea Agreement with my client. To my knowledge, my client is making an 
informed and voluntary decision to plead guilty and to enter into the Plea 
SIGNATURE (Defendant's Attorney) 
Paul S. Kish 
Kish Law LLC 
229 Peachtree Street, NE 
Suite 2505, International Tower 
Atlanta, GA 30303 
(404) 207-1338 
State Bar of Georgia Number 424277 
Filed in Open Court 
This _ 
day of--~ 2024 
By _________ _ 
DlXTE 
I 
/ 
19 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 19 of 20

I 
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 
Statement of Special Assessment Account 
This statement reflects your special assessment only. There may be other 
penalties imposed at sentencing. 
ACCOUNT INFORMATION 
CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 
l:24-CR-304 
DEFENDANT'S NAME: 
BOEROEPAE JORDAN 
PAY THIS AMOUNT: 
$200 
Instructions: 
1. Payment must be made by certified check or money order payable to: 
Clerk of Court, U.S. District Court 
*personal checks will not be accepted* 
2. Payment must be made to the clerk's office by the day of sentencing. 
3. Payment should be sent or hand delivered to: 
Clerk, U.S. District Court 
2211 U.S. Courthouse 
75 Ted Turner Drive SW 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 
(Do Not Send Cash) 
4. Include the defendant's name on certified check or money order. 
5. Enclose this coupon to insure proper and prompt application of payment. 
6. Provide proof of payment to the above-signed AUSA within 30 days of the 
guilty plea. 
20 
Case 1:24-cr-00304-SDG     Document 3-1     Filed 10/10/24     Page 20 of 20

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gand.335268.3.1.pdf

Size

274,618 bytes

SHA-256

ca789f5c3f78a194a54136666040692106d4ed952788e1f96455eb50b76f3035

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gand.335268.3.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)