Court filing
Order for Continuance — United States v. Spitzer (Dkt. 131, D.N.J.)
Summary
An Order for Continuance in United States of America v. Arthur Spitzer, Criminal No. 24-528 (ESK), in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed January 2, 2026 and signed by District Judge Edward S. Kiel. The order rests on a joint application of the United States, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Elisa T. Wiygul, and the defendant, by Henry Mazurek and Jason Ser. It notes that the Court has granted three prior continuances and finds the case unusual or complex under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i). The order continues the action until March 31, 2026 and excludes that period in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed January 2, 2026 in Arthur Spitzer; one of 21 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2026-01-02 |
Cite this document
“Order for Continuance — United States v. Spitzer (Dkt. 131, D.N.J.).”
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 1:24-cr-00528, Doc. 131, filed 2026-01-02. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-arthur-spitzer/2026-01-02-order-for-continuance-dkt-131/
, SHA-256 225e99e822817c0f1ab58d49ec331d418cb65e375121887b6d83d62ad4915de2.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document131 Filed 01/02/26 Page 1 of 3 PagelD: 635
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal No. 24-528 (ESK)
Vv. Hon. Edward S. Kiel
ARTHUR SPITZER ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE
This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of the
United States (Elisa T. Wiygul, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant
Arthur Spitzer (Henry Mazurek, Esq. and Jason Ser, Esq., appearing) for an order
granting a continuance of proceedings in the above-captioned matter; and the
defendant being aware that he has the right to have this matter brought to trial
within 70 days of the date of his appearance before a judicial officer of this court
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1); and the Court having granted three prior
continuances; and the defendant having consented to such continuance and having
waived such right; and for good cause shown,
IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued
for the following reasons:
1. This case is an unusual or complex case within the meaning of the
Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), in light of the number of defendants,
the number of charges, and the nature of the prosecution, such that it is
unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for the trial
Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document131 Filed 01/02/26 Page 2 of 3 PagelD: 636
itself within 70 days.
2. The discovery in the case is voluminous and additional time is
necessary to ensure that, taking into account the exercise of diligence, defense
counsel have sufficient time to review and inspect discovery and further investigate
the charges in this matter.
3. Defendant Spitzer has filed pretrial motions, and the Court has set a
schedule for briefing of those motions and has scheduled oral argument on the
motions for March 16, 2026.
4. The parties may enter into plea negotiations, which, if fruitful, could
save the time and resources of the Court and parties, and avoid a trial.
5. Asa result of the foregoing, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A)
and (h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv), the ends of justice are served by the granting of this
continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a
speedy trial.
IT IS, therefore, on this 31 st day of December, 2025,
(1) ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued until
March 31, 2026; and it is further
(2) ORDERED that the period from the date of this order through
March 31, 2026 be and it hereby is excluded in computing time under the Speedy
Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seg.
/s/ Edward S. Kiel
Honorable Edward S. Kiel
United States District Judge
Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document 131
Consented to as to form and entry:
/s/ Elisa T. Wiygul
ELISA T. WIYGUL
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Qe
HE MAZUREK, ESQUIRE
J SER, ESQUIRE
unsel
C for defendant Arthur Spitzer
Filed 01/02/26
Page 3 of 3 PagelD: 637File and source
- File
- 131.pdf
- Size
- 390,146 bytes
- SHA-256
- 225e99e822817c0f1ab58d49ec331d418cb65e375121887b6d83d62ad4915de2
- Our copy
- 131.pdf