Scheduling Order — United States v. Spitzer (Dkt. 57-1, D.N.J.)

Summary

A proposed Scheduling Order, Document 57-1, in United States of America v. Arthur Spitzer, Mendel Deutsch, and Joshua Feldberger, Criminal No. 24-528 (ESK), in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed April 17, 2025. The form of order states that the parties have agreed the case requires extensive discovery under the Court's Standing Order for Criminal Trial Scheduling and Discovery No. 15-2. It would set pretrial motions due on or before August 15, 2025, responses by September 12, 2025 and replies by September 26, 2025, with a final pretrial conference after the motions are decided. The day of April 2025, the argument date and the signature line for Judge Edward S. Kiel are left blank.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK      Document 57-1   Filed 04/17/25   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 205




                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY



 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                    Criminal No. 24-528 (ESK)


                     v.                      Hon. Edward S. Kiel


 ARTHUR SPITZER,                             SCHEDULING ORDER
 MENDEL DEUTSCH, and
 JOSHUA FELDBERGER



      This matter having come before the Court for an entry of a scheduling

order; and the United States being represented by Alina Habba, United States

Attorney for the District of New Jersey (Daniel A. Friedman, Assistant U.S.

Attorney, appearing); and the defendants and their counsel as follows: Arthur

Spitzer (Henry Mazurek, Esq. and Jason Ser, Esq., appearing), Mendel Deutsch

(Timothy D. Sini, Esq. and Eric Ferrante, Esq. appearing), and Joshua

Feldberger (Zach Intrater, Esq., appearing); and the parties having met and

conferred and having determined that this matter may be treated as a criminal

case that requires extensive discovery within the meaning of Paragraph 4 of this

Court’s Standing Order for Criminal Trial Scheduling and Discovery No. 15-2

(“the Standing Order”); and for good cause shown,

      IT IS on this _________ day of April 2025, ORDERED as follows:

      1.       The following shall be the revised schedule for pretrial motions in

this matter:

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK    Document 57-1     Filed 04/17/25   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 206




             a)    The parties shall file any and all pretrial motions, pursuant to

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 12(b) and 41(h), in the manner set forth in

L. Civ. R. 7.1, on or before August 15, 2025.

             b)    The parties shall file any response to pretrial motions on or

before September 12, 2025.

             c)    The parties shall file any reply on or before September 26,

2025.

             d)    Oral argument on pretrial motions shall be held on

_______________________ at ____ a.m./p.m.

        2.   Pursuant to Paragraphs 17 to 21 of the Standing Order, the Court

shall, in consultation with the parties, schedule a final pretrial conference that

will be held no sooner than two (2) weeks following the disposition of pretrial

motions. If appropriate, a trial date will be set at this final pretrial conference.




                                       __________________________________________
                                       THE HONORABLE EDWARD S. KIEL
                                       United States District Judge

File and source

File

57-att1.pdf

Size

68,428 bytes

SHA-256

a8362e0803df38ee65e9d6425dad6522624a31eecfc49c249f6595589fabaf2a

Our copy

57-att1.pdf