Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Arthur Spitzer case — U.S. District Court, D.N.J. Order for Continuance — United States v. Spitzer (Dkt. 17, D.N.J.)

Court filing

Order for Continuance — United States v. Spitzer (Dkt. 17, D.N.J.)

Summary

An Order for Continuance in United States of America v. Arthur Spitzer, Mendel Deutsch, and Joshua Feldberger, Criminal No. 24-528 (ESK), in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed September 3, 2024, before Judge Edward S. Kiel. The order rests on a joint application of the United States, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel A. Friedman, and counsel for each defendant, including Henry Mazurek for Spitzer, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove for Deutsch, and Zach Intrater for Feldberger. It finds that each defendant consented to the continuance and waived the right to trial within 70 days under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). The order excludes time through May 12, 2025 in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed September 3, 2024 in Arthur Spitzer; one of 21 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
Filed2024-09-03

Cite this document

“Order for Continuance — United States v. Spitzer (Dkt. 17, D.N.J.).” U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 1:24-cr-00528, Doc. 17, filed 2024-09-03. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-arthur-spitzer/2024-09-03-order-for-continuance-dkt-17/, SHA-256 8c1f25cd0e2f025a618d0b4380e8b7b78a71344f226b7f5c0e0d10cb4c5186a0.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document17 Filed 09/03/24 Page 1 of 3 PagelD: 89

                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA              Criminal No. 24-528 (ESK)

                Vv.                   Hon. Edward S. Kiel

ARTHUR SPITZER,                       ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE
MENDEL DEUTSCH, and
JOSHUA FELDBERGER

      This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of the

United States, by Philip R. Sellinger, United States Attorney for the District of

New Jersey (Daniel A. Friedman, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and

defendants Arthur Spitzer (Henry Mazurek, Esq. and Jason Ser, Esq.,

appearing), Mendel Deutsch (Todd Blanche, Esq., and Emil Bove, Esq.,

appearing), and Joshua Feldberger (Zach Intrater, Esq., appearing) for an order

granting a continuance of proceedings in the above-captioned matter; and the

defendants being aware that the defendants have the right to have this matter

brought to trial within 70 days of the date of his appearance before a judicial

officer of this court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c}(1); and each defendant

having consented to such continuance and having waived such right; and for

good cause shown,

      IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be

continued for the following reasons:

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document17 _ Filed 09/03/24 Page 2 of 3 PagelD: 90

1. This case is an unusual or complex case within the meaning of the
Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii), in light of the number of
defendants, the number of charges, and the nature of the prosecution, such
that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings
or for the trial itself within 70 days.

2. The discovery in the case is expected to be voluminous and
additional time is necessary to ensure that, taking into account the exercise of
diligence, defense counsel have sufficient time to review and inspect discovery
and further investigate the charges in this matter.

3. Asa result of the foregoing, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A)
and (h)(7)(B)(ii) and (iv), the ends of justice are served by the granting of this
continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a
speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this BO day of September, 2024,

(1) ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued until
May 12, 2025; and it is further

(2) ORDERED that the period from the date of this order through

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Documenti7 _ Filed 09/03/24 Page 3 of 3 PagelD: 91

May 12, 2025 be and it hereby is excluded in computing time under the Speedy
Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.

—-

_
Honorable Kawart’S” Kiel

United States District Judge

Consented to as to form and entry:

Ql hL

DANIEL A. FRIEDMAN.
Assistant U.S. Attorney

‘cheep

HE
J,

SER, a BSCR
ounsel for defendant Arthur Spitzer

MT

ODD BLANCHE, ESQUIRE
EMIL BOVE, ESQUIRE
Counsel for defendant Mendel Deutsch

ADD

ZACH INTRATER, ESQUIRE
Counsel for defendant Joshua Feldberger

File and source

File
17.pdf
Size
35,757 bytes
SHA-256
8c1f25cd0e2f025a618d0b4380e8b7b78a71344f226b7f5c0e0d10cb4c5186a0
Our copy
17.pdf
Back to top