Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings U.S. v. Amos Mundendi Transcript: Bail Revocation Hearing — United States v. Amos Mundendi

Court filing

Transcript: Bail Revocation Hearing — United States v. Amos Mundendi

Summary

A transcript of a bail review hearing held October 14, 2022 in United States of America v. Amos Mundendi, No. 1:21-cr-00247-PAE, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, before District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, filed November 23, 2022 as Document 201. The court opens by stating it has reviewed the transcripts of the earlier bail arguments and two pretrial services reports. An Assistant United States Attorney argues for remand, stating that the pretrial services offices in New York and the Northern District of Texas also favor it, and recounts an arrest in July 2022, further reported incidents in September, and non-compliance with supervision conditions. The court indicates the defendant is being remanded, declines to send him back to Dallas, and notes that sentencing is set for November 9. The transcript is 35 pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

No. 1:21-cr-00247-PAE · Doc. 201 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE    Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 1 of 35   1

1    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
     SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2    ------------------------------x

3    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

4                v.                                  21 CR 247 (PAE)

5    AMOS MUNDENDI,

6                   Defendant.                       Hearing
     ------------------------------x
7
                                                     New York, N.Y.
8                                                    October 14, 2022
                                                     10:10 a.m.
9

10   Before:

11
                              HON. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER,
12
                                                     District Judge
13
                                    APPEARANCES
14
     DAMIAN WILLIAMS
15        United States Attorney for the
          Southern District of New York
16   BY: DINA McLEOD
          Assistant United States Attorney
17
     FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF NEW YORK, INC.
18        Attorneys for Defendant
     BY: TAMARA GIWA
19

20   Also Present:
     Joshua Rothman, U.S. Pretrial Services (SDNY)
21   Lauren Flood, U.S. Pretrial Services (NDTX)
     Sofia Rao, Paralegal
22

23

24

25

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE    Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 2 of 35   2

1               (Case called)

2               MS. McLEOD:     Good morning, your Honor, Dina McLeod for

3    the government.    With me at counsel table is Joshua Rothman

4    from U.S. Pretrial Services.

5               THE COURT:     Good morning, Ms. McLeod, and good morning

6    to you, Mr. Rothman.

7               For the defense.

8               MS. GIWA:     Federal Defenders of New York by Tamara

9    Giwa for Mr. Mundendi.       Also at counsel table is my paralegal,

10   Sofia Rao.    Good morning, your Honor.

11              THE COURT:     Good morning, Ms. Giwa; good morning,

12   Ms. Rao; and good morning, of course to you, Mr. Mundendi.

13   Good morning as well to our court reporter.

14              I understand as well that on the phone from Texas is

15   Pretrial Officer Lauren Flood.

16              Ms. Flood, are you there?

17              MS. FLOOD:     Yes, your Honor.

18              THE COURT:     Good morning to you.

19              Counsel, I understand that this is a bail review

20   hearing, and I have reviewed the following materials in advance

21   of it.

22              I have reviewed in detail the transcripts of both the

23   bail arguments before Judge Netburn and before this Court from

24   2021.    You should assume detailed familiarity by the Court with

25   everything that happened at that hearing, including, relevant

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 3 of 35      3

1    here, the admonition that I gave to the defendant on page 47

2    that "if there is one misstep, if you breach your conditions of

3    bail in the slightest way, you can expect that the government

4    will be before me asking for you to be detained, and you can

5    expect that I will do so.      I'm just saying that lept out to me

6    on my review.

7              I have also reviewed the reports from Mr. Rothman,

8    dated September 14 and September 29 of this year.              And, most

9    recently, the police reports were handed up to me literally as

10   I was leaving chambers to head downstairs.          I can't tell

11   offhand how much they reproduce what Officer Rothman had

12   previously provided or whether they are fresh.           I will ask

13   counsel to alert me to that when they speak.

14             With that preface, I'll turn the floor first to

15   Ms. McLeod.

16             MS. McLEOD:     Yes, your Honor.     We are here for a bail

17   review at the request of pretrial, but certainly the government

18   concurs in the need for a bail review.

19             We are seeking remand at this point.           Our

20   understanding is that pretrial services is also seeking remand.

21             THE COURT:     May I ask you, back in the day, last year,

22   pretrial services in Texas favored detention and pretrial

23   services in New York favored release on the muscular conditions

24   of bail that Judge Netburn put in place.          Your representation

25   to me is that both pretrial services agencies now favor remand.

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE    Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 4 of 35   4

1               MS. McLEOD:    I should clarify.      My understanding, from

2    speaking with Ms. Flood, was that Ms. Flood was in favor of

3    remand.

4               THE COURT:    Let me just ask a yes or no.         I'll come to

5    you later on.

6               Mr. Rothman, does pretrial in New York favor remand?

7               MR. ROTHMAN:    Yes, your Honor.

8               MS. McLEOD:    I am not sure if you want to hear

9    argument at this point, but that is the position of the

10   parties.

11              THE COURT:    I would welcome brief argument, but you

12   can incorporate by reference the fact pattern as set out at the

13   prior hearing.

14              MS. McLEOD:    As your Honor is well familiar, the

15   government argued for detention originally on somewhat

16   different grounds, primarily flight, and also concern about the

17   defendant's willingness to submit to government authority.

18              In recent months, after the defendant has pleaded

19   guilty, the defendant has been arrested a number of times.

20              In July, he was arrested for stealing iPhones from his

21   place of employment, which was UPS.

22              THE COURT:    Tell me, just briefly -- what is most

23   important to me is what's new.       I'm happy for you to unpack

24   those factually.

25              MS. McLEOD:    In September --

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 5 of 35   5

1              THE COURT:     Sorry.    You said July.

2              MS. McLEOD:     Yes.

3              THE COURT:     He was arrested for stealing iPhones from

4    his place of business.

5              MS. McLEOD:     In July 2022.

6              THE COURT:     What became of that charge?

7              MS. McLEOD:     I believe all of the charges to which

8    there have actually been arrests are still pending.

9              THE COURT:     Do you know anything more about those

10   events?

11             MS. McLEOD:     Yes.    Based on reading the police report,

12   essentially Mr. Mundendi was caught on camera putting an Apple

13   watch or Apple product in his backpack.         He went through the

14   x-ray and was seen carrying it through the x-ray.            I believe he

15   was stopped at that point.        They also -- he admitted only to

16   taking one or two Apple products.        UPS believed it was much

17   more, based on other empty boxes that were lying around.

18             THE COURT:     You said his place of business or place of

19   employment.

20             MS. McLEOD:     I'm sorry.    His place of employment.

21             THE COURT:     He had a job at this point.

22             MS. McLEOD:     Yes.    He worked at UPS.

23             THE COURT:     You are saying he apparently admitted

24   taking one to two, but the employer felt it was more.

25             MS. McLEOD:     Yes.    He said -- he admitted to taking an

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201    Filed 11/23/22   Page 6 of 35    6

1    iPhone and an Apple watch and said he sold both of them at a

2    phone store.    UPS believed he was responsible for others that

3    he did not admit to.

4               I assume, as a result of that, he was -- I know he was

5    terminated.    I assume it was as a result of this.

6               One of the reasons, I think, among others, for seeking

7    remand is the fact that at this point he is not employed.                He

8    has no verifiable employment.      There is sort of no stable

9    employment.    That's justifying keeping him out, given these

10   other things that have happened.

11              Then, in September, on September 22, in quick

12   succession, September 22 and September 27, so within five days,

13   there were two assaults.

14              The first assault, which was September 22, involved

15   the defendant at a hookah lounge.         The defendant was very

16   intoxicated, and he walked inside without, I think, paying the

17   cover charge, so security approached him.           He punched the

18   bouncer with a closed fist, went into the bathroom, broke a

19   bathroom mirror and then was just very intoxicated, so he was

20   arrested for public intoxication and class C assaults of the

21   bouncer.

22              THE COURT:    I'm sorry.     Public intoxication.       What was

23   the second?

24              MS. McLEOD:   Class C assault of the bouncer.

25              THE COURT:    Those are also pending?

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 7 of 35   7

1               MS. McLEOD:    I believe that's pending, although at any

2    point Ms. Flood can correct me, but my understanding that's all

3    pending.

4               THE COURT:    Later I'll call on her, but go ahead.

5               MS. McLEOD:    Then, on September 27, the defendant

6    showed up at a restaurant called Kiss, and he entered the

7    restaurant.    He's apparently a regular at this restaurant.            He

8    walked straight up to a person who was, I guess, a patron at

9    the restaurant, said:      Keep my name out of your mouth, and then

10   punched him in the face.

11              THE COURT:    Punched the patron?

12              MS. McLEOD:    The patron with a closed fist and then

13   left, so was not arrested at the scene, because he had left by

14   the time the responding officers arrived.

15              THE COURT:    Were charges eventually brought arising

16   out of that?

17              MS. McLEOD:    I believe that might have been the one to

18   which they are still considering charges, because I think they

19   might still be sort of maybe pulling up video, or something

20   like that.

21              Then the final report that I have is -- I don't think

22   that there was an arrest related to this, but there is a

23   September 28 report where essentially the defendant's friend or

24   acquaintance let the defendant borrow his car, which is a 2015

25   Mercedes, and he asked him to borrow his car on September 25

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE    Document 201   Filed 11/23/22    Page 8 of 35     8

1    for a quick errand.      The defendant said it would take ten

2    minutes.    The defendant then just kept his car for, I think, a

3    number of days.    It wasn't recovered until September 29.                For

4    four days he kept his friend or acquaintance's car, despite the

5    acquaintance, the owner of the car, repeatedly saying, I want

6    my car back.    Eventually, the defendant was, I think,

7    confronted by the police and gave the keys back and identified

8    where the car was.

9               Separately, speaking to Ms. Flood, he also apparently

10   took his exgirlfriend's car without permission and then

11   eventually returned it.

12              THE COURT:    Is that the exgirlfriend who was at the

13   time of the hearing in 2021 the girlfriend?

14              MS. McLEOD:    I don't know the answer.

15              THE COURT:    I see Ms. Giwa nodding.          Is that the same

16   person?

17              MS. GIWA:     Yes.   I think we are referring to Charisma

18   Iwu, who was Mr. Mundendi's fiancé.

19              THE COURT:    Thank you.

20              MS. McLEOD:    She did not file a police report for the

21   taking of that car, but I believe reported that to pretrial.

22              Obviously, there are a number of sort of involvements

23   with the criminal justice system that are concerning.

24              In addition to that, my understanding, from speaking

25   to Ms. Flood, is that there have been other issues of

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE    Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 9 of 35   9

1    noncompliance where the defendant, for example, has left the

2    Northern District of Texas without permission a number of

3    times.   Just to give total context, the Northern District of

4    Texas does have close borders with other districts.

5               So after a couple of these things happened, a couple

6    of this sort of leaving without permission happened, Ms. Flood

7    gave him a map and said, these are the borders of the Northern

8    District of Texas.       You have to stay within these borders.          He

9    told her that he like couldn't read a map, and he still has had

10   issues, I think, staying within the boundaries of the Northern

11   District of Texas.

12              In addition, there have been a number of sort of

13   domestic disturbances at the exgirlfriend's apartment that have

14   involved Mr. Mundendi.       This is based on what police officers

15   told Ms. Flood, that they had told her we had a number of these

16   issues at the exgirlfriend's apartment, and Mr. Mundendi has

17   been identified.    Because of that, Ms. Flood told him, don't

18   go -- I am going to draw a little zone around the

19   exgirlfriend's apartment.       You are not to go into this zone.

20              He was noncompliant with that.        On September 27, he

21   did go to the exgirlfriend's apartment.          He said he had a

22   package.    He had a communication with Ms. Flood where she told

23   him to leave, to have a friend who is there get the package for

24   him.   He did leave.

25              However, there have been concerns on the

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 10 of 35   10

1    exgirlfriend's part that he has been sort of showing up at her

2    family's businesses.      He has been sort of popping up where her

3    friends are around.      Sort of the spirit, I think, of what

4    Ms. Flood was trying to do is perhaps also not being complied

5    with.

6              I think, in totality, I think what we are seeing here

7    is the defendant -- in addition, in terms of atmospherics, in a

8    number of the reports I have seen he has appeared to have been

9    sort of shouting at Ms. Flood and has been not respectful of

10   her, yelling at her, hanging up on her.          It doesn't seem at

11   this point that he is amenable to supervision.            So that's one

12   issue.

13             The other issues are just at this point he is also

14   posing a danger to society.       He is punching people in the face.

15   That's not something that can be tolerated.

16             He does not have a job.       So in terms of -- often, I

17   think, one important reason for someone to remain on bail

18   conditions is so they can maintain stable employment.              That is

19   an important good.

20             He lost his job because he stole from his employer.

21   So that aspect is out the window.

22             He is apparently -- he is behaving erratically and he

23   is not complying with supervision.        So, in the government's

24   mind, especially with sentencing so close and a number of these

25   things happening in close succession, it just does not seem

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22    Page 11 of 35   11

1    possible for him to remain out, given his track record.

2              THE COURT:     Sentencing is November 9?

3              MS. McLEOD:     Yes, your Honor.

4              THE COURT:     Is the guideline range calculated in the

5    PSR consistent with the parties' plea agreement?

6              MS. McLEOD:     I believe so.     I have the PSR here.          But

7    I believe so.

8              THE COURT:     Thank you, Ms. McLeod.

9              Let me just briefly go to the two pretrial officers,

10   and then I'll turn to the defense.

11             Ms. Flood, yes or no, were you able to hear

12   Ms. McLeod?

13             MS. FLOOD:     For the most part, yes.          It kind of went

14   in and out, but I could hear.

15             THE COURT:     No need to reprise what she said, but is

16   there anything you would like to add?

17             MS. FLOOD:     I would like to add that it's not just

18   with me that he has been like that towards.              He has also been

19   like that towards my supervisor.        I think it's kind of his

20   consistent pattern of behavior recently.          I agree with

21   everything that's been said.

22             He does state that he is working as a solar

23   salesperson.    However, that's unverified, and I have not been

24   able to get any documents from him to verify that employment.

25             THE COURT:     Is it your view that he is both a danger

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 12 of 35    12

1    to the community and a risk of flight, or just a danger to the

2    community?

3              MS. FLOOD:     A danger to the community.        The only

4    instance where he has not appeared to me as directed was

5    Wednesday, where he was apparently in the hospital, and he was

6    to supposed to report to me at 1 p.m. but he did not.

7              THE COURT:     Other than that, though, how often has he

8    supposed to appear and how often has he appeared?

9              MS. FLOOD:     I've been reporting to him, making contact

10   in the field, and every time I have even asked him to meet me

11   somewhere, he has done that.

12             THE COURT:     As to flight, that had been the primary

13   argument for his detention a year ago.          It seems to have

14   flipped now, given recent events.        At this point the central

15   issue is, as to flight, is he going to show up for sentencing

16   on November 9?     Realistically, I think you are saying to me you

17   don't have factual basis to seriously doubt that he would show

18   up for sentencing.       Is that correct?

19             MS. FLOOD:     That is correct, your Honor.

20             THE COURT:     Ms. McLeod, back to you to clarify.             The

21   spirit of your remarks was aimed at the danger to the

22   community.    Is that the basis on which you are moving for

23   detention?

24             MS. McLEOD:     Yes.   Danger to the community and

25   noncompliance with supervision.

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 13 of 35   13

1              THE COURT:     Thank you.

2              Mr. Rothman, I'm happy to hear from you if you have

3    something to add.

4              MR. ROTHMAN:     Sure.    I just want to clarify what AUSA

5    McLeod had said with regards to the UPS theft.            The incident is

6    alleged to have occurred in July.        The arrest on that did not

7    occur until September 14, when local authorities were called to

8    respond to an incident between Mr. Mundendi and his

9    exgirlfriend, or exfiancé, and a record check was run and the

10   warrant showed up.

11             THE COURT:     I see.    Is it your understanding that that

12   charge is still pending?

13             MR. ROTHMAN:     Yes.

14             THE COURT:     Do you know whether other charges arising

15   out of the incidents that Ms. McLeod set out, if any other

16   charges are pending?

17             MR. ROTHMAN:     I believe so.     But Officer Flood may

18   have some better knowledge of the local court calendars.

19             THE COURT:     Anything else you want to add?

20             MR. ROTHMAN:     No, your Honor.

21             THE COURT:     Officer Flood, let me just ask you, to

22   your knowledge, as the person locally on the scene, what, if

23   any, charges are pending against Mr. Mundendi in Texas?

24             MS. FLOOD:     All of the charges are pending at this

25   time.   When he was arrested on the 29th, that was due to his

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 14 of 35   14

1    probation violation warrant out of Tarrant County.             The most

2    recent assault on the 27th, I spoke with the detective

3    yesterday, and charges for a class A misdemeanor and assault

4    are most likely forthcoming.       If those are filed, then a

5    warrant will be issued for his arrest.

6              THE COURT:     I just want to make sure I have a list of

7    what's pending.     There is a charge pending, I gather, with

8    respect to the UPS theft, right?

9              MS. FLOOD:     Yes, your Honor.

10             THE COURT:     Just list for me what other charges are

11   either pending or, as you understand it, soon to be filed.

12             MS. FLOOD:     The theft charges out of Tarrant County

13   from UPS are pending, the assault from Irving City in Dallas

14   County are pending.      There is an investigation into the most

15   recent assault.     That is also pending.       And I believe Hertz is

16   pending for the theft of the vehicle.         I have not heard back

17   from Hertz, but it is my understanding that those charges are

18   pending as well.

19             THE COURT:     There are at least two that are pending.

20   There is one that is thought by you to be imminent and another

21   one that may or may not be pending.

22             MS. FLOOD:     Yes, your Honor.

23             THE COURT:     In effect, four incidents of which at

24   least two have resulted in pending charges.

25             MS. FLOOD:     That's correct.

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201    Filed 11/23/22   Page 15 of 35   15

1               THE COURT:     Mr. Mundendi, apart from being under

2    supervision from this Court during the period of the recent

3    charges, was he on some form of supervision for a state

4    offense?    I would welcome clarity on that.

5               MS. FLOOD:     Yes.   He was on probation out of Tarrant

6    County, an 18-month term for an assault that I believe happened

7    either at the beginning of his pretrial or before he was

8    initially arrested on this case.

9               THE COURT:     Thank you very much.

10              Ms. Giwa.

11              MS. GIWA:     Your Honor, there really does exist here a

12   combination of conditions that the Court can impose to ensure

13   both that Mr. Mundendi return to court for his sentencing and

14   to mitigate any concerns about danger.           It seems to clear that

15   I don't really need to talk about the concerns about the risk

16   of flight.    Mr. Mundendi appeared voluntarily from Texas.               He

17   arrived last night.       He came to our office and came to court

18   with us.    It sounds like there is no issue there.

19              I really do just want to spend some time talking about

20   the concerns about danger.        I understand that your Honor is

21   familiar with the record here.          But there has been a

22   significant period of time in which you haven't really heard

23   anything about Mr. Mundendi because in fact he was doing quite

24   well under supervision.

25              Your Honor ordered his release on bail in May of 2021,

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 16 of 35    16

1    so for almost a year and a half he really was thriving on

2    supervision.    I think that Officer Flood would say the same.

3    In that time Mr. Mundendi was working.          He became engaged to

4    the woman who was his girlfriend at the time of the initial

5    bail hearing, Ms. Ewu.         That engagement was a big deal.       We

6    were all sort of involved in hearing about that and sort of

7    helping him prepare for that.         That was an important thing for

8    him and his family to get to a place where he could now think

9    about spending the rest of his life --

10             THE COURT:     Is he still engaged to her?

11             MS. GIWA:      No.    We speak to his former fiancé a lot.

12   She called us even yesterday.         The relationship is a bit in

13   flux.   Frankly, I think that is part of what's happening here.

14             Mr. Mundendi, as your Honor also knows, also has a

15   nine-year-old son, and for the last year and a half he spent a

16   lot of time with his son.         Mr. Mundendi's son has his own sort

17   of cognitive issues, and Mr. Mundendi is a very active parent

18   and coparents with his son's mother.

19             As Officer Flood noted, he was reporting.            He has been

20   in regular, sometimes excessive communication with my office.

21   He really has -- he took the mandates of the supervision and

22   tried to make the most of it by really engaging in a productive

23   life.   I am not going to sort of review all of Mr. Mundendi's

24   history, especially since your Honor has recently read the bail

25   transcripts, but your Honor knows that Mr. Mundendi overcame a

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201    Filed 11/23/22   Page 17 of 35   17

1    lot to be in this position.

2               He was a refugee from the Democratic Republic of the

3    Congo.   He fled war and came to this country.             He didn't speak

4    English.    In fact, he didn't speak for many years.            He was moot

5    as a result of the trauma that he endured.            So to get to a

6    place where he could be working and parenting and then become

7    engaged to somebody, I really can't overstate what that means

8    for him.    He really did overcome a lot to be here.

9               I certainly don't want to minimize the concerns about

10   what's happened.     The police contacts certainly are serious and

11   are concerning.     I do just want to really make clear that all

12   of these incidences have occurred in the last, I guess, maybe

13   month and a half.

14              THE COURT:    The July one, the alleged theft occurred

15   in July.    The other three occur in September, right?

16              MS. GIWA:     That's right.    The police contact, the

17   arrests have all occurred in September.

18              THE COURT:    Right.   But one of them arises out of a

19   July incident.

20              MS. GIWA:     That's right, your Honor.

21              The facts there are still disputed.            Mr. Mundendi

22   resigned from his job as a result of extensive communications

23   between his union and his employer, so that really hasn't been

24   resolved.

25              THE COURT:    May I ask you, though, putting aside the

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22    Page 18 of 35   18

1    quantity, is it correct that Mr. Mundendi acknowledged taking a

2    couple of Apple products?

3               Mr. Mundendi is nodding vigorously.

4               MS. GIWA:     I think that's right, your Honor.          Yes, he

5    did.   But I think the circumstances under which that happened

6    are somewhat complicated.       Given that there are pending charges

7    related to that, I am not really in a position to state much

8    more --

9               THE COURT:     I don't mean for you to impede his

10   defense.    At the same time, the government made factual

11   representations about what happened.         For the purposes of this

12   proceeding, can I infer that what the government has said is

13   undisputed, even though you are not conceding it for the

14   purposes of proceeding in Texas?

15              MS. GIWA:     I would say that all of the facts are

16   undisputed, given those charges are pending.              But certainly

17   Mr. Mundendi has honestly indicated, with regards to the UPS,

18   there were some items that were taken from his place of

19   employment.    He is no longer working there.            He certainly is

20   somebody who has been employed for his adult life, and I

21   understand the government has concerns that he is not currently

22   employed.    But that's certainly something that he could change.

23   He would be happy to be employed.

24              THE COURT:     Tell me about the two assaults, alleged

25   assaults.

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 19 of 35   19

1              MS. GIWA:      Your Honor, the truth is that I am not a

2    mental health expert, and I don't want to opine.             What I think

3    really is happening here is there has been some sort of mental

4    health crisis or break.       I am not sure really what the

5    appropriate terminology is.

6              And I say that based on my conversations initially

7    with Officer Flood, who has said the same thing to me.              She has

8    said that Mr. Mundendi is doing quite well and then something

9    happened, and she now has serious concerns about his mental

10   health.   We have spoken extensively with his fiancé, who has

11   said the same thing.

12             On top of that, we retained an expert, a psychologist

13   who specializes in working with refugees from West Africa.               She

14   specializes in trauma.       She is preparing our mitigation

15   materials for sentencing.       She is perfectly suited for

16   Mr. Mundendi's needs.       She has met with him eight times in

17   order to prepare her mitigation materials.           As soon as we were

18   notified of the first arrest, we contacted her, she reached out

19   to Mr. Mundendi, and she really, the expert has also relayed to

20   me that she is very concerned --

21             THE COURT:      Is there a working theory as to what has

22   gone wrong recently?

23             MS. GIWA:      I think part of it is the impending

24   sentencing has -- I think Mr. Mundendi is just terrified.                His

25   fiancé told me that in the lead-up to the sentencing he just

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE    Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 20 of 35   20

1    was not sleeping.        He was not eating.    I do see that that is

2    reflected in his face and in his body.           I saw him today after

3    not seeing him for several months, and he physically looks

4    different.    My understanding is that he went to the hospital

5    because he collapsed, also because he wasn't eating and wasn't

6    drinking water and was not sleeping.

7              There is something going on here.           There is some sort

8    of crisis happening.       What Mr. Mundendi really needs is

9    treatment.    So our expert, Dr. Akinsulure-Smith, she has put us

10   in contact with a psychologist in Austin who is in the process

11   of making a referral for Mr. Mundendi to receive treatment

12   virtually because he is now on home incarceration.              I think

13   really that is what he needs, coupled, certainly with some sort

14   of substance abuse and alcohol treatment.

15             Really what I'm proposing, your Honor, is that the

16   Court continue, rather, Mr. Mundendi's home incarceration.                He

17   has been on home incarceration now since the beginning of this

18   month.   My understanding is there have not been any issues

19   there.   Being confined to his home means that he does not

20   present any risk of danger to the community.              And while he is

21   at home, not employed during this period, he can participate in

22   therapy over Zoom, virtually, and he can engage in treatment,

23   as so many of my clients have during the pandemic, virtually,

24   and really try to address the issues that have led to this

25   destabilization, frankly, that really is confined to quite

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22    Page 21 of 35   21

1    short periods of time, given the length of time that he has

2    been under supervision.

3               THE COURT:    Pretrial Officer Flood indicated that

4    there were circumstances in which he violated conditions of

5    release, not merely by the alleged assaults and the alleged

6    theft, and the alleged use of alcohol, but going beyond

7    geographic restrictions.

8               First of all, is that disputed?

9               MS. GIWA:     It's not disputed.     Officer Flood can

10   correct me on the facts.      My understanding is that Mr. Mundendi

11   went to Plano, which, according to Google Maps, is about 50

12   minutes, actually, north of where he lives.              He lives -- he is

13   supervised in the Northern District of Texas.              I think he drove

14   north in a way that, I guess, to me even was not immediately

15   clear.    I went onto the Court's website and looked at the map

16   itself.    It was not immediately clear to me that Plano was not

17   in the Northern District.      My understanding is that Plano is in

18   fact part of the Dallas metro area.

19              Yes, it is not disputed that he did leave his

20   district.    I think, even as Ms. McLeod noted, the borders -- he

21   does live on the border, and he did go just past --

22              THE COURT:    Your perspective on that one, it's a

23   misapprehension as to the border.

24              MS. GIWA:     Yes, your Honor.

25              THE COURT:    May I ask you, though, Officer Flood

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE    Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 22 of 35   22

1    indicated that she, as part of her supervision, admonished

2    Mr. Mundendi not to go near what's being referred to as the

3    exgirlfriend's house and that apparently on multiple occasions

4    he breached that.        Factually, is any of that disputed?

5              MS. GIWA:       No, your Honor.    The breakup, or whatever

6    is happening, has been very complicated.           And the engagement

7    involved Mr. McLeod's family, his fiancé's family, us, our

8    expert that we retained.        It really was, sort of in a really

9    cultural way, bringing together these two families.

10             THE COURT:       As it relates to today, what you are

11   saying is, he can be trusted to comply with the home

12   incarceration terms because he hasn't breached them in the

13   short period of time that they have been in place, but the

14   record appears to reflect that putting aside the assault and

15   the drinking and the theft, that on several occasions he has

16   breached other terms put in place by pretrial, including recent

17   ones instructing him not to get near the exgirlfriend's house.

18             Short question is, what's the reason to be confident

19   that he will abide between now and sentencing with the home

20   incarceration terms, given that the very same pretrial officer

21   recently put in place a clearer red line as to the

22   exgirlfriend's house and he breached that?

23             MS. GIWA:       Your Honor, it wasn't clear to me that that

24   actually was a clear red line as much as advice to Mr. Mundendi

25   to stay out of trouble.        He should stay away from her, from

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 23 of 35   23

1    Ms. Ewu, because of their relationship.          Certainly if there

2    were a condition imposed by the Court that he is to stay away

3    from her, he certainly will.

4              We have spoken to Ms. Ewu about whether she has called

5    the police, whether or not she wants an order of protection.

6    That's not something she wants.

7              She was considering coming today.          She is certainly

8    coming to the sentencing.      The relationship really is very

9    complicated.    But certainly if your Honor told Mr. Mundendi

10   that he is not to go anywhere near her house or her family, he

11   would comply with that, and certainly if he were on home

12   incarceration, he couldn't.

13             THE COURT:     Anything further?

14             MS. GIWA:      Nothing, your Honor.

15             THE COURT:     I'm mindful that for a variety of reasons

16   it may be against Mr. Mundendi's interest to speak,

17   particularly with a variety of other matters pending and with

18   his sentencing here pending.       But have you conferred with him

19   about his speaking here is something he would like to do?

20             MS. GIWA:      Could I just have a minute?

21             THE COURT:     Of course.

22             Look.    I will allow him to speak, if you ask me to do

23   so, but I'm also mindful that his legal interests may be

24   adversely affected by speaking, so I just want to extend the

25   opportunity.

                       SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                                (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22    Page 24 of 35   24

1              MS. GIWA:      Thank you.

2              Your Honor, Mr. Mundendi would like to address the

3    Court very briefly.

4              THE COURT:      Have you reviewed with him what he is

5    going to say, just to make sure he doesn't inadvertently do

6    something against his legal interests?

7              MS. GIWA:      I have, your Honor, and I certainly will

8    interrupt, if necessary.

9              THE COURT:      Mr. Mundendi, I'm happy to hear from you,

10   but I want to emphasize what I know Ms. Giwa has emphasized.

11   You've got a sentencing coming up before this Court, and you

12   have apparently some proceedings in Texas.           There is some

13   danger that anything you say here might be unhelpful to you in

14   any of those proceedings.       If you see Ms. Giwa trying to stop

15   you, please stop and confer with her.

16             Go ahead, Mr. Mundendi.

17             THE DEFENDANT:      Good morning, Judge.

18             THE COURT:      Good morning.

19             THE DEFENDANT:      I'm sorry for crying in your

20   courtroom.    I learned one thing, that in the heat of the moment

21   a man who keep his calm has figured life out.

22             And I'm a fan of you, Judge.        I did some reading, very

23   interesting.    I'm touched.

24             UPS, I never got fired.

25             Judge, I have a nine-year-old son.             I'm his hero.    He

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE    Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 25 of 35   25

1    asked me:    Can you take me to the state fair?           Something I

2    can't even do because of the home arrest.

3               I'm no threat to society.        I have a family of 50

4    people back home in my country that I support, and the

5    government said that I'm wiring money to Africa.

6               My son just want me to take him to the state fair.

7               I will follow your rules.        You give me a chance, and I

8    show you I came back twice already.          Why would I mess it up the

9    third time.

10              I don't have no other family here, I mean outside of

11   America.    America gave me a chance.

12              I didn't know how to read and write until the age of

13   19, and I taught myself how to do that.           I speak six different

14   languages fluently.       I'm a philanthropist.

15              I give my life to God.        And the moment I did that, I

16   do have a living trust that control the holding company that

17   manage ten of my (unintelligible).

18              I never ran out of job.        You asked me to get a job.         I

19   went and got UPS, very hard labor.          Never complained.       I worked

20   so hard to the point they off me a supervisor position.               They

21   wanted to do an extensive background, and I knew this stuff was

22   going to come up.        So I said no.    I resign that job.       I left

23   that job.

24              But I do sell solar systems to homeowners.            And my

25   first commission was $11,000.        My second was $25,000.         That is

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 26 of 35   26

1    how I got money to propose to somebody that I thought I loved,

2    but come to find out they was just there for money.             I am not

3    going to go in details.      It's my past.

4               I just want to take my son to the state fair.             Then

5    I'll remain in home incarceration until whatever, Judge, you

6    want me to do.     I'm not a threat to society.          I'm not.    I give

7    my life to God, and I walk according to the Bible.

8               I'm not a flight risk.       They removed the ankle

9    monitor.    I came over there.     Nobody knew where I reside and I

10   came here.

11              I know my mistakes, my involvement in this whole

12   scheme, and I accept it.      I just want you to give me a chance

13   to go save another human being, because I try to kill myself

14   more than ten times before.       When I was in Essex County, one of

15   the worst time in my life.

16              THE COURT:    Thank you, Mr. Mundendi.         Anything

17   further?

18              THE DEFENDANT:    Thank you.

19              THE COURT:    Ms. McLeod, let me just ask you something

20   I neglected to.     The earlier bail proceedings were governed by

21   the statute governing presentence determinations as to release

22   or detention.    We are now at a different stage of the case.

23              To make sure I'm on the right page, am I right that at

24   this point, under 3143(a), the presumption is different, that

25   the standard here is that, in effect, unless the government is

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201    Filed 11/23/22   Page 27 of 35   27

1    recommending a nonprison -- unless the government is

2    recommending against imprisonment, as I understand it, I need

3    here to find, by clear and convincing evidence, that, as

4    relevant here, Mr. Mundendi does not pose a danger to society.

5              MS. McLEOD:     Yes, your Honor.

6              THE COURT:     Ms. Giwa, is that correct?

7              MS. GIWA:      That is correct, yes, your Honor.

8              THE COURT:     In other words, at this point the onus, in

9    effect, is on the defense to establish, by clear and convincing

10   evidence, the absence of a danger.

11             MS. GIWA:      Yes, your Honor.

12             THE COURT:     Ms. McLeod, at the time of the plea I left

13   the bail conditions in place.       Refresh my memory whether that

14   was a debated issue or whether, on consent, we continued the

15   conditions in place in light of Mr. Mundendi's then compliance.

16             MS. McLEOD:     It was not a debated issue, and we agreed

17   to continue the conditions.

18             THE COURT:     Thank you.

19             I just need a minute.         Thank you.    I am ready to rule.

20             The standard governing this bail application is set by

21   Title 18, United States Code, Section 3143(a), which governs

22   the release or detention of a defendant pending a sentence.

23             The defendant, prior to trial, is to be detained if no

24   condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure

25   his appearance as required and the safety of any other person

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 28 of 35    28

1    or the community.

2              Under 3143(a), the presumptions that earlier applied

3    shift.   And whereas at an earlier stage it was the government's

4    burden to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the

5    defendant posed a risk of flight and by clear and convincing

6    evidence that the defendant posed a danger to the community,

7    such that no condition or combination of conditions could

8    satisfactorily address that risk, the burden shifts now.

9              Under 3143(a), unless no term of imprisonment is being

10   recommended by the government, which is not the case here, the

11   burden is on the defense.      It needs to be established by clear

12   and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to

13   flee and that the defendant is not likely to pose a danger to

14   the community that can't be contained reasonably by the

15   imposition of conditions or a combination of conditions.                 And

16   both parties have agreed just now that that is in fact the

17   governing standard.

18             I would note that, according to Mr. Smallman, the

19   presentence report here in fact recommends a term of

20   imprisonment of between 63 and 78 months.           The plea agreement

21   recommended one between 57 and 71 months.

22             The government, just to confirm, will you be

23   recommending a term of imprisonment?

24             MS. McLEOD:     Yes, your Honor.

25             THE COURT:     In determining bail, I am required to

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 29 of 35   29

1    consider a number of factors.       These include the nature and

2    circumstances of the offense charged, including whether the

3    offense is a crime of violence, the weight of the evidence

4    against the defendant, the history and characteristics of the

5    defendant, the nature and seriousness of the danger presented

6    to any person or the community that would be posed by the

7    defendant's release, and whether or not the defendant was on

8    probation at the time of the offense.

9              At the time of Mr. Mundendi's arrest, the government

10   pursued detention.       Judge Netburn imposed a muscular set of

11   bail conditions.     The government appealed, and I held a lengthy

12   conference on the government's appeal, held on May 18, 2021.              I

13   incorporate by reference everything that was said there.

14             Although the focus there was flight, not danger, I

15   pronounced ultimately the decision to affirm the magistrate

16   judge and keep Mr. Mundendi out on conditions as a very, very

17   close call.    I put it that way.       And I warned Mr. Mundendi,

18   after telling him how close the question was of the following:

19   "If there is one misstep, if you breach your conditions of bail

20   in the slightest way, you can expect that the government will

21   be before me asking for you to be detained, and you can expect

22   that I will do so."

23             That was, in part, based on the considerable criminal

24   history that Mr. Mundendi had developed and the government's

25   well-founded concerns, based on that history, that he would be

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22    Page 30 of 35   30

1    undeterred by this pending case and might commit additional

2    offenses.

3              I ultimately relied on the strength of the bail

4    package and the recommendation of pretrial in Manhattan, in the

5    Southern District, to allow Mr. Mundendi out.              But I pronounced

6    it, as I said, a very, very close call.

7              Several things have changed since.             One is, of course,

8    that the presumption has shifted by virtue of Mr. Mundendi's

9    guilty plea.    But much more to the point, recent events have

10   been alarming.     I recognize in saying what I'm about to say

11   that Mr. Mundendi has not been adjudged guilty of any of the

12   criminal conduct that has been proffered to me today, but I am

13   mindful that charges are pending on at least several of the

14   incidents, and where charges are pending it bespeaks a

15   determination of probable cause in the event that the offense

16   was committed.

17             I also note that in significant measure, as

18   represented to me by counsel, Mr. Mundendi, either on the scene

19   or at the time of the events or back in Texas, admitted

20   elements of what he had done wrong, if not the entire thing, or

21   today has admitted dimensions or elements of the offenses.

22             But one of them involves a theft from his then

23   employer, UPS, apparently as admitted by Mr. Mundendi, of at

24   least a couple of Apple items and, as alleged by the employer,

25   more than that.

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 31 of 35    31

1              There have also been two incidents in which, in an

2    apparently aggrieved state and in at least one instance in an

3    alcohol-fueled state, Mr. Mundendi is alleged to have swung his

4    fist and hit somebody, one person at least, the bouncer in the

5    face.   And then there is a separate incident, facts of which

6    are somewhat murkier, involving his ex-fiancé.

7              In these events are described a number of clear

8    violations of the conditions of release.          By definition, any

9    state offense, including hitting somebody in the face or

10   stealing property, is a violation of release because the

11   conditions of release preclude violations of law.             Being

12   inebriated as described in the bouncer incident is a violation

13   of release, and there have also been an instance in which

14   Mr. Mundendi left the district, although I understand that

15   there is an argument that it was an inadvertent mistake and an

16   incident or two in which he disobeyed the directives of the

17   pretrial officer to stay away from his ex-fiancé.

18             More broadly, counsel have described and defense

19   counsel have candidly described erratic behavior in the last

20   month in particular and perhaps going back to the theft.                 It

21   may be that these are brought about by the pending sentencing

22   here.   It may be that these are brought about by the breakup

23   with the girlfriend.      It may be that the breakup with the

24   girlfriend itself is a product of the erratic behavior or the

25   impending sentencing.

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22    Page 32 of 35   32

1              I can't today unpack causation, but the fact of the

2    degree of erratic behavior recently is alarming.              It may be

3    that that's what led two people to get punched in the face and

4    four breaches with respect to the girlfriend and her zone of

5    privacy, and the alcohol to take place.          But, at the end of the

6    day, all of this bespeaks a danger.         There is a danger to the

7    next person who might get hit in the face.           There is a danger

8    to a person who might be a victim of theft.              Insofar as

9    Mr. Mundendi has a prior history of a range of offenses that

10   include assault, I don't think that the recent events can be

11   treated as so singular that we can be confident they are not

12   going to happen again.

13             Bottom line is, I perceive a very real and present

14   danger that Mr. Mundendi, if at liberty, would potentially hurt

15   somebody, particularly given the erratic and aroused state that

16   he has been described as being in.

17             I appreciate the vigor of the advocacy, as always, by

18   Ms. Giwa, and she has made the best argument possible, which is

19   that conditions can be intensified, including through home

20   incarceration, that would tide Mr. Mundendi through between now

21   and sentencing, on November 9, which is a little under four

22   weeks away.

23             The problem is that, at the end of the day, experience

24   teaches that a defendant who wants to breach home incarceration

25   can easily breach it.      It has happened many times.          Home

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 33 of 35   33

1    incarceration does not mean having bars around one's home.

2    It's ultimately still a matter of the will of the defendant.

3              Mr. Mundendi has, in recent weeks and going back to

4    July, months, violated conditions also set by the Court and

5    pretrial, and he disregarded what the diligent Officer Flood

6    directed him to do, wisely, in staying away from the

7    exgirlfriend for her interests, as well as presumably

8    Mr. Mundendi's.

9              Under those circumstances, where the existing

10   conditions just simply have not been abided by Mr. Mundendi, I

11   simply have lost confidence that Mr. Mundendi will abide by the

12   conditions of pretrial, and I'm quite alarmed that in his

13   present state -- I'm quite worried that if he isn't

14   incarcerated, somebody is going to get hurt between now and

15   sentencing.

16             Put in legal terms, I do not find that the defense has

17   carried its burden at this point to propose conditions that can

18   reasonably assure the safety of the community.            I am not

19   relying on risk of flight.      That hasn't been argued today.           I

20   am relying solely on danger.       But I do not find that the

21   defense has met its burden, indeed, under the circumstances.

22   Even if the burden had been what it was between indictment and

23   plea, I would find that the government has met the burden it

24   would have then borne to establish, by clear and convincing

25   evidence, an unsolvable danger to the community.

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 34 of 35   34

1              With regret, I am going to order the defendant's

2    detention effective immediately.

3              In saying that, I want to emphasize to you,

4    Mr. Mundendi, that I have a very open mind as to the sentencing

5    in this case.    I was obliged to engage with this set of

6    problems now and have done so.

7              I'm mindful there is a lot more to you, Mr. Mundendi,

8    than has been proffered here today, and I'm eager to hear what

9    the mitigation specialist and other persons on your behalf say

10   about you in connection with sentencing.

11             But my charge here, as relevant, is to protect the

12   safety of the community, and I am alas convinced that there is

13   no combination of conditions that can reasonably assure the

14   safety of the community with you in your present state.

15             I'm signing an order that remands Mr. Mundendi to the

16   custody of the United States Marshals.

17             Anything further from the government?

18             MS. McLEOD:      No, your Honor.

19             THE COURT:      Anything further from the defendant?

20             MS. GIWA:      Your Honor, would you consider the remand

21   going into effect this evening?         Mr. Mundendi flew to New York

22   last night.    He was in a hotel last night with all of his

23   property.    I would just ask that he be allowed to return back

24   to Dallas and then surrender himself -- self-surrender tonight

25   when he gets back to Dallas.

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300
     MAEMMUNH
     Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 201   Filed 11/23/22   Page 35 of 35   35

1              Part of the reason for that is that, in my experience,

2    the transport of people from one district to the other is

3    arduous and takes a long time.

4              THE COURT:     He is going to be sentenced here on

5    November 9.    I assume he will stay here through -- at this

6    point there is no purpose in going back to Dallas.             He is going

7    to be sentenced here in 25 days.

8              To the extent there is an issue about him retrieving

9    material from the hotel, I hope that there is a way in which he

10   can authorize you or somebody on his behalf to pick it up, but

11   I don't see any value in his going back to Dallas.             He is only

12   going to have to appear here again.

13             Insofar as he is being remanded, what you're

14   effectively proposing is that he goes back to Dallas for no

15   apparent reason, and then returns here.          I don't see that.

16   Only bad things can happen in Dallas.

17             To the extent the issue is his getting stuff from the

18   hotel, I encourage you to see what you can do on his behalf to

19   retrieve his materials.      If unexpectedly you need some

20   certification from the Court that I am authorizing you as his

21   counsel to retrieve that, I will be happy to do that.

22             MS. GIWA:      Thank you, your Honor.

23             THE COURT:     We stand adjourned.

24             (Adjourned)

25

                      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
                               (212) 805-0300


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nysd.558852.201.0.pdf
Size
125,501 bytes
SHA-256
dfd36b88a4eeb09cd2c0f40495b2254766fe4825c05026fd9a756ed59bd1d303
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nysd.558852.201.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top