Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings U.S. v. Amos Mundendi Transcript: Presentment, Arraignment and Bail Hearing — United States v. Amos Mundendi

Court filing

Transcript: Presentment, Arraignment and Bail Hearing — United States v. Amos Mundendi

Summary

A 26-page transcript of remote presentment and arraignment proceedings held May 12, 2021 in United States of America v. Amos Mundendi, Docket #21cr247, before Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed May 25, 2021 as Document 24. The Court notes the proceeding is by telephone under the CARES Act, Section 15002 and standing orders of the Chief District Judge, and takes the defendant's waiver of the right to appear in person. It advises him of his rights, approves appointment of counsel, and reads the four-count indictment charging conspiracy under Title 18, Section 371, major fraud against the United States under Section 1031, wire fraud conspiracy under Section 1349, and wire fraud under Section 1343. The Court then discusses release conditions with Pretrial Services, including remaining in the Northern District of Texas.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

No. 1:21-cr-00247-PAE · Doc. 24 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE     Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 1 of 26


                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

  In re:                                          :
                                                    Docket #21cr247
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                     : 1:21-cr-00247-PAE-3

                             Plaintiff,           :

     - against -                                  :

    AMOS MUNDENDI,                                : May 12, 2021
                                                    New York, New York
                             Defendant.           :

  ------------------------------------ : REMOTE PRESENTMENT
                                         AND ARRAIGNMENT


                            PROCEEDINGS BEFORE
                       THE HONORABLE SARAH NETBURN
                     UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

  APPEARANCES:

  For Plaintiff:              UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
                              BY: DINA MCLEOD, ESQ.
                              One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
                              New York, New York 10007

  For Defendant:              FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF NEW YORK INC.
                              BY: TAMARA GIWA, ESQ.
                              52 Duane Street, 10th Floor
                              New York, New York 10007

  ALSO PRESENT:               Pretrial Services Officer




  Transcription Service: Carole Ludwig, Transcription Services
                         155 East Fourth Street, #3C
                         New York, New York 10009
                         Phone: (212) 420-0771
                         Email: Transcription420@aol.com

  Proceedings recorded by electronic sound recording;
  Transcript produced by transcription service.
Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24    Filed 05/25/21   Page 2 of 26



                                       INDEX


                         E X A M I N A T I O N S

                                                 Re-      Re-
    Witness              Direct    Cross       Direct    Cross    Court

    None

                              E X H I B I T S

    Exhibit                                                             Voir
    Number    Description                                 ID     In     Dire

    None
1
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 3 of 26
 1                                                                      3

2              HONORABLE SARAH NETBURN (THE COURT):                     Good

3    afternoon, everyone, this is Judge Netburn.

4              THE CLERK:      Good afternoon, Your Honor .                 This

5    is the matter of the U nited States versus Amos

6    Mundendi, 21cr247.       And starting with the government,

7    could you please state your appearance for the record.

8              MS. DINA MCLEOD:         Good afternoon, Your Honor,

9    this is Dina McLeod f or the government.

10             THE COURT:      Good afternoon.

11             MS. TAMARA GIWA:         Federal Defenders of New

12   York by Tamara Giwa for Mr. Mu ndendi, good evening.

13             THE COURT:      Good evening.         Mr. Mundendi, can

14   you hear me?

15             THE DEFENDANT:       Yes, Your Honor.

16             THE COURT:      Okay, because of the pandemic

17   we’re conducting this proceeding remotely by

18   telephone. Ordinarily, you would appear in person

19   before the Court, but under the authority provided by

20   the CARES Act, Section 15002, and the standing orders

21   of our Chief District Judge, you can waive your right

22   to appear in person and consent to proceed by

23   telephone.     Have you discussed with your lawyer

24   whether you agree to continue with this proceeding by

25   telephone?
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 4 of 26
 1                                                                      4

2               THE DEFENDANT:      Yes, Your Honor.

3               THE COURT:     And do you, in fact, agree to

4    continue with this proceeding by telephone?

5               THE DEFENDANT:      Yes, Your Honor.

6               THE COURT:     Okay.     I’ll note for the record

7    your consent to appear by telephone and your voluntary

8    waiver of any right to appear in person.                 Can I have

9    the date and time of the defendant’s arrest?

10              MS. MCLEOD:      Yes, Your Honor, the defendant

11   was initially arrested on April 22 n d in Dallas and he

12   was first presented in the Northern District of Texas

13   on April 23 r d .    He arrived in the Southern District o f

14   New York on a marshal transport in the afternoon, May

15   11 t h .

16              THE COURT:     Thank you.       Sir, the purpose of

17   today’s proceeding is to advise you of certain rights

18   that you have, inform you of the charges against you,

19   consider whether counsel shall be appoint ed for you,

20   and decide under what conditions, if any, you shall be

21   released. I am now going to explain certain

22   constitutional rights that you have.

23              You have the right to remain silent. You are

24   not required to make any statements. Even if you have

25   already made statements to the authorities, you need
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24    Filed 05/25/21   Page 5 of 26
 1                                                                       5

2    not make any further statements.              Any statements that

3    you do make can be used against you.

4              You have the right to be released, either

5    conditionally or unconditionally pending trial, unless

6    I find that there are no conditions that would

7    reasonably assure your presence in court or the safety

8    of the community.

9              You have the right to be represented by an

10   attorney during all court proceedings including this

11   one, and during all questioning by the authorities. If

12   you cannot afford an attorney, I will appoint one

13   today to represent you.            I have reviewed your

14   financial affidavit. Based on the information

15   contained in that affidavit, I’m approving the

16   appointment of your counsel.

17             Is this case referred for presentment and

18   arraignment?

19             MS. MCLEOD:       It is, Your Honor.

20             THE COURT:      Sir, you’ve been charged in a four

21   count, I believe it’s four counts, yes, a four count

22   indictment.     Count one charges you with conspiracy to

23   commit major fraud against and defraud the United

24   States.   That count is brought under Title 18 of the

25   United States Code Section 371.           Count two charges you
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 6 of 26
 1                                                                      6

2    with major fraud against the United States.              That count is

3    brought under Title 18 of the United States Code Section

4    1031 and 2.    Count three charges you with a wire fraud

5    conspiracy. That count is brought under Title 18 of the

6    United States Code Sections 1349 and 2.             And count four

7    charges you with the act of wire fraud which is brought

8    under Title 18 of the United States Code Sections 1343 and

9    2.

10             Sir, have you had an opportunity to discuss this

11   indictment with your lawyer?

12             THE DEFENDANT:      Yes, just partially but not in

13   full, Your Honor.

14             THE COURT:      Okay.     You haven’t received a copy

15   though, is that correct?

16             THE DEFENDANT:       I have not, I have not seen it

17   but the attorney kind of read it for me.

18             THE COURT:      Okay, do you understand the nature

19   of the charges?       Sorry, I didn’t hear your answer?

20             THE DEFENDANT:       I mean like kind of, Your

21   Honor, but not fully. I mean like it’s (indiscernible)

22   situation, I’ve never, it never happened to me before,

23   Your Honor , so I don’t really, really understand or

24   know what’s really, you know, going on.

25             THE COURT:      Okay.     You have a right to have me
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 7 of 26
 1                                                                      7

2    read the indictment to you in open court, if you would

3    like I can read it to you if that’s something that

4    would help you?

5              THE DEFENDANT:       Yes, Your Honor.

6              THE COURT:      You’d like me to read it to you?

7              THE DEFENDANT:       Yes.

8              MS. GIWA:      I’m sorry to interrupt, this is

9    Tamara Giwa, Federal Defenders. I did speak with Mr.

10   Mundendi about the charges and we did go through all

11   of the charges. Because I spoke to him while he was in

12   the marshals’ custody he wasn’t able to receive a

13   physical copy of the indictment. My understanding of

14   what he is now expressing to the Court, which is what

15   he expressed to me in our conversation, is just that

16   this experience is so overwhelming for him, he’s been

17   detained for quite a period of time, transported

18   across the country, and so he just is overwhelmed by

19   what is happening. And I think that’s what he means

20   when he says that he doesn’t really understand this.

21             We did discuss the charges and I believe that

22   Mr. Mundendi did understand what the charges against

23   him were.

24             THE COURT:      Okay, well I’m happy to read him

25   the indictment if he would like, or if he would like
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24    Filed 05/25/21   Page 8 of 26
 1                                                                       8

2    an opportunity to speak with you privately. I am just

3    going to ask him to enter a plea at this time so if he

4    feels comfortable doing that we can also just proceed.

5              MS. GIWA:     Your Honor, this is Tamara Giwa, I

6    don’t think it’s necessary for you to read out the

7    indictment. And Mr. Mundendi will be entering a plea

8    of not guilty, so I think we can proceed with that.

9              THE COURT:      Okay, are you satisfied w ith that,

10   Mr. Mundendi?

11             THE DEFENDANT:       Yes, Your Honor.

12             THE COURT:      Okay, so I’ll enter a plea of not

13   guilty on your behalf.

14             I understand that the government is seeking

15   detention in this case.            Counsel, are you prepared to

16   make a bail application?

17             MS. GIWA:      Yes, Your Honor , this is Tamara

18   Giwa, I am.

19             THE COURT:      All right, I’ll hear from the

20   government first.

21             MS. MCLEOD:       Thank you, Your Honor.              So the

22   basis for our detention motion is primarily risk of

23   flight, although I do think there is a basis to

24   consider the defendant a danger to the community.

25   First, I want to talk a little bit about the
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 9 of 26
 1                                                                      9

2    defendant’s incentives to flee.             The defendant is

3    facing significant exposure in this case. As the

4    indictment notes, the attempted loss was well over $14

5    million, it will likely end up being higher than that.

6    The actual loss was well into the millions, as well.

7    He’s likely to be subject to an enhancement for

8    sophisticated means, not taking into account the

9    defendant’s criminal history, but even assuming he has

10   a category one criminal history he would be looking at

11   63 to 78 months in prison guidelines with a plea, and it

12   seems likely that he is not in category one for criminal

13   history.   So in terms of the defendant’s intentions,

14   you know, he is facing significant -- significant

15   prison time.

16              He has substantial ties abroad.               He, the

17   status, the immigration status I think is a little

18   unclear in the United States, but he’s not citizen, he’s

19   not an LPR and he was born in the Democratic Republic of

20   the Congo. So he, you know, certainly could return home

21   where he, you know, has citizenship. I understand he came

22   to the United States I maybe 2005/2006 time period. So

23   that’s the first sort of concern is the incentive to flee.

24              What really compounds the government’s concern

25   here is the number of identification documents that the
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 10 of 26
 1                                                                   10

2    defendant has in different names, and his professed

3    rejection of government authority over him. The defendant

4    claims to be a Moorish citizen. You can see that in the

5    photo that the government sent to the Court where he has

6    an ID which talks about being, you know, a Moorish

7    national. He’s also been recorded on a phone call with a

8    source saying that he, El Ashile Mundi is his Moorish

9    name, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, you

10   know, Moorish citizens believe, you know, like other

11   sovereign citizen movements that individual citizens are

12   independent of the authority, of federal and state

13   governments, that they have immunity from authorities.

14   That, you know, this perceived immunity grants them the

15   rights to do various things. I’m not imputing every belief

16   of, you know, a sovereign citizen movement to Mr.

17   Mundendi, but this is consistent with what he told the

18   officer, according to a police report and an arrest report

19   that happened in December, where he told an officer that

20   he didn’t have to follow the speed limit because the

21   government was a corporation and cannot tell people what

22   to do.

23              He also said that he didn’t need a driver’s

24   license, a license plate or car insurance because he

25   didn’t belong to the government.           So the idea that he is
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 11 of 26
 1                                                                   11

2    going to follow Court order and Pretrial supervision,

3    seems inconsistent with his rule belief which is that he

4    is not subject to the authority of the United States

5    government or any statement government. He is a member of

6    the Moorish Nation and, as such, is immune from that

7    authority.

8               In addition, in the sort of text chains that the

9    government provided to the Court and to defense counsel in

10   which he sent that photo of his various IDs, he stated, “I

11   can go anywhere in the world without a visa.”                So he also

12   talked somewhat about, he referenced a Moroccan passport.

13   So whether or not that’s true, whether or not he can go

14   anywhere in the world without a visa, it’s certainly a

15   belief he’s professed to a codefendant that that’s a

16   possibility for him, which compounds the government’s

17   concern.

18              In addition, it’s not just that he has multiple

19   IDs, I mean that’s a major problem, these are multiple IDs

20   in different names, the government knows that he has used

21   multiple IDs to travel in the United States. So we have

22   obtained records from a major domestic airline for a

23   flight that the defendant took to Ft. Lauderdale and back

24   and on one leg, he used an ID for Amos Mundendi and on the

25   other leg he used an ID for El Ashile Mundi. Because if
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 12 of 26
 1                                                                   12

2    you look at the manifest you can see that that was the

3    name.   So clearly these IDs are sufficient for him to get

4    on an airplane and he’s using them, he’s using different

5    ones.   So that’s a serious, serious concern.

6               We also know that as part of the fraud scheme he

7    was in communication or at least told the source that he

8    was in communication with someone who was essentially

9    going to doctor documents for these fraudulent loan

10   applications, again, suggesting that he has contacts who

11   have these capabilities. He apparently has some capability

12   to either make or obtain various ID cards, because, as you

13   can see in the photo, he has several, and those aren’t

14   even the ones, the IDs in the photo aren’t even all of the

15   IDs because clearly he showed different ones to the

16   police officer because some of the IDs referenced in

17   the police report are not in that photo.

18              This is also consistent with his rap sheet,

19   which is not, not insignificant, some of these are

20   misdemeanors, but I think there’s a, there are some

21   concerning items here. There’s a couple of, a couple

22   of assault charges. There is, in 2014, a theft of

23   property over $100,000 which was a felony. There was,

24   in July, 2020, he was arrested for fraud, use,

25   possession of identifying information, items numbering
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 13 of 26
 1                                                                   13

2    10 to 50. I don’t have the police report for that but

3    the charges seem to suggest that he was possessing a

4    number of IDs in that itemized, in the 10 to 50 number

5    range.

6               Also troubling is that in 2020 he was arres ted

7    three times. It’s a little unclear from both the rap

8    sheet the government has, which has been provided to

9    defense counsel and from the Pretrial Report, exactly

10   what the conditions of bond were for these arrests.

11   It’s a little unclear when or if he was on bond for

12   these arrests.       However, the last arrest that was just

13   like December 28, 2020, suggests that there was a

14   bench warrant for him, it just says March 9, 2021,

15   warrant which, again, would be sort of consistent with

16   this failure to comply with condi tions and, frankly,

17   the law.

18              He has in the April 29, 2012, arrest, it also,

19   he had a charge of failure to appear, it’s a little

20   unclear if that means failure to appear in court. So

21   that, I think these are sort of, again, compounding

22   the government’s conce rn that there’s this, there is a

23   world view which the defendant has expressed

24   specifically to law enforcement that he is not

25   required to comply with government authority. That he
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 14 of 26
 1                                                                   14

2    has multiple fake ideas.       Well, again, I don’t know if

3    they’re fake, he has multiple IDs in different names of

4    himself, that’s his photo on them. he has used those

5    ideas, different ideas to travel on airplanes. He believes

6    himself to be able to travel anywhere in the world without

7    a visa, and he has, he’s facing significant exposure and

8    he has times to the Democratic Republic of Congo. And the

9    incentive here just might be, well, if I’m going to get

10   convicted anyway, I might as well just leave.                So that’s,

11   I think that’s the concern.

12              I can touch briefly on the strength of the

13   government’s case, I think which is also a factor, which

14   is relevant to the Court’s consideration.              The strength of

15   the government’s case is quite strong. I know we typically

16   say that, but in this case we have multiple recorded phone

17   calls and screenshots of what that message is between the

18   defendant and a cooperating witness, discussing fraudulent

19   PPP loan applications. That was among the conversations

20   that they had were the one I was referencing earlier where

21   the defendant, you know, said I’ll send document that you

22   sent me over to this guy who will fix it up in sum and

23   substance. And, you know, various sort of like handling

24   logistic type things of sending things for, sending

25   documents back and forth for the loan applications. So the
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 15 of 26
 1                                                                   15

2    evidence is quite strong, we have, again, recorded

3    conversations and text messages specifically about the

4    fraud.    So, again, I think that also sees into the

5    incentive here, which is that the government’s case is

6    very strong and the sentencing exposure is very, is

7    significant.

8               So unless the Court has any questions, those are

9    the government’s concerns and why we’re seeking detention.

10              THE COURT:     Thank you.      I’ll hear from defense

11   now.

12              MS. GIWA:     Your Honor, this is Tamara Giwa. I

13   would ask the Court to release Mr. Mundendi and impose

14   the conditions that were proposed by Pretrial Services

15   in their report. I’d like to really just hone in on

16   this issue of risk of flight, that is what the

17   government has identified as their primary basis for

18   seeking detention, so I just want to clarify some

19   issues for the Court.

20              Mr. Mundendi is now 32 years old and, as I

21   noted earlier, the Court is aware he’s been detained

22   on this case for quite some time. He was arrested on

23   April 22 n d .   This case I think has come as quite a

24   wakeup call to him, he’s quite sh ocked by what’s been

25   going on, he’s expressed that to me. That is, as I
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 16 of 26
 1                                                                   16

2    noted earlier, what I think he was trying to express

3    to the Court.

4               Mr. Mundendi is not somebody who can actually

5    leave this country. His immigration status I don’t

6    think is so unclea r. He came to the United States when

7    he was 16 years old and he came as an asylee.                His family

8    sought asylum in the United States from the Democratic

9    Republic of Congo because they were fleeing the war.

10   And so they were resettled in the United States and they

11   were resettled in Dallas. And Mr. Mundendi has lived in

12   Dallas since he was 16 years old, since 2005.                His entire

13   family lives there, it is the only place that he has ever

14   lived outside of the Democratic Republic of Congo. And his

15   four siblings who are all older than him who have their

16   own families, the live there, his parents live there, his

17   girlfriend lives there.       Mr. Mundendi went to high school

18   in Dallas, he attended some college there, that really is

19   his home and he has very, very strong ties to that

20   community.

21              Our office has spoken with both of his parents

22   today and we’ve also spoken with his girlfriend. All three

23   of those people work. His girlfriend is a United States

24   citizen. I think his parents may also be United States,

25   yes, his parents are also United States citizens.                   His
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 17 of 26
 1                                                                   17

2    parents work, his girlfriend works, and those are three

3    people who we believe would immediately be approved as

4    cosigners on a bond.

5               In addition to his siblings and his parents and

6    his girlfriend, Mr. Mundendi also has an 8 year old son

7    who lives in Dallas. And Mr. Mundendi, although he is

8    separated from his son’s mother, the do co-parent, and Mr.

9    Mundendi sees his son frequently, he has him every single

10   weekend, and his son has autism. And I raise this only

11   because the family has raised this is an issue that is

12   concerning to them, that Mr. Mundendi’s incarceration will

13   have a very significant impact on the development and

14   wellbeing of his son because of his diagnosis and

15   because they are so close.

16              We see that Pretrial has pr oposed two

17   cosigners, but I think that we would be able to locate

18   certainly the three that I’ve identified, and maybe

19   even an additional person if the Court would be so

20   inclined to add cosigners.

21              Prior to his arrest, Mr. Mundendi was working.

22   Once the pan demic hit, he had some trouble finding

23   work, but he has had experience working in marketing

24   and sales, also in Dallas.

25              Your Honor , I also want to point out to the
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 18 of 26
 1                                                                   18

2    Court that Mr. Mundendi here is charged on this

3    indictment with two codefendants. Those two

4    codefendants have already been presented, one before

5    Judge Cave and one before Judge Parker, and both of

6    those people were released. And based on my reading of

7    the indictment, the charges against them in some ways

8    indicate more serious offense conduct, in cluding

9    things like the fact that money was transferred to the

10   bank account of those two codefendants.

11              So I think that given that they were released

12   on conditions, there is no reason that Mr. Mundendi

13   also should not be released. And so I would ask the

14   Court to take all of that into account and then to

15   adopt the conditions that Pretrial proposes with the

16   addition of maybe one or two additional cosigners.

17              THE CLERK:      Judge, it’s Rachel, I’m not sure

18   if you have your phone muted.

19              THE COURT:      Thank you.       Do you wish to address

20   the issue of the multiple identification cards that

21   were located and also the reporting that when your

22   client was arrested by a Texas police officer he

23   suggested, I think quite directly, that he was not

24   subject to the enforcement of tha t police officer’s

25   jurisdiction?
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 19 of 26
 1                                                                   19

2               MS. GIWA:      Your Honor , this is Tamara Giwa. I

3    don’t have any further information about the identity

4    documents, although I, one of the conditions of

5    Pretrial Services, of course, would be to turn in any

6    travel documents and identifications, and not to use

7    any others. And I think the Court could craft some

8    additional language around the issue of the ID cards.

9               In terms of the arrest, again, I also have

10   limited information there, but my understanding is

11   that my client may have b een intoxicated at the time

12   and so I’m really not sure that the Court should give

13   much weight to any statements that may or may not have

14   been made there.       And, certainly, I think that any of

15   Mr. Mundendi’s maybe religious or ideological beliefs

16   don’t really have any bearing on whether or not he

17   presents a risk of flight here, Your Honor.

18              THE COURT:      Well unless those beliefs suggest

19   that he doesn’t believe he needs to follow a Court

20   order --

21              MS. GIWA:      Your Honor , this is Tamara Giwa.

22   I’m sorry, for inte rrupting you, this is Tamara Giwa.

23   I don’t think that really is a concern here. As I

24   stated at the beginning, Mr. Mundendi really is in

25   shock about what has happened, as is his family, and
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 20 of 26
 1                                                                   20

2    we did discuss what all the possibilities here might

3    be. And I thin k that he understands that and I do not

4    have any concerns that he would not be able to follow

5    the Court’s orders.

6               THE COURT:      All right, anything further from

7    the government?

8               MS. MCLEOD:      Nothing in particular, Your

9    Honor, I guess I would just like to briefly respond to

10   the argument about this case has been a wakeup call

11   for him. I don’t think that that argument would ring

12   true, at least for the government. He’s been arrested

13   on fraud charges before, he’s been arrested on assault

14   charges before, why would this case be a wakeup call

15   for him when none of those other cases where he was

16   convicted before on at least one of those cases, so I

17   don’t see why this case is somehow, you know,

18   strikingly different to him.

19              THE COURT:      With whom does he live on Bel Air

20   drive?

21              MS. GIWA:      Your Honor , this is Tamara Giwa,

22   Mr. Mundendi lives with both of his parents, his

23   father, Mr. Mundendi, and his mother, Ms. Elonga

24   (phonetic).

25              THE COURT:      And you’ve indicated that they are
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 21 of 26
 1                                                                   21

2    US citizens?

3               MS. GIWA:      Yes, they are both US citizens.

4               THE COURT:      Okay.    All right, I think we can

5    fashion conditions to release the defendant but he

6    will not be released until they are satisfied. And one

7    of them is that I would like to have either his mother

8    or his father serve as a third party custodian, which

9    means that I’d like to speak with them and explain to

10   them what that means.         So that is an important part of

11   any release, that they agree to be a third party

12   custodian and that they understand from the Court w hat

13   that means.

14              In addition, I’m going to set a bond amount of

15   $200,000 that needs to be cosigned by four people. And

16   that condition needs to be met before the defendant will

17   be released.    Assuming he satisfies those conditions, he’ll

18   be supervised in his district of residence which is in

19   Texas, and he is ordered to live with his parents, and his

20   Pretrial supervision will be as directed by this Pretrial

21   Services officer, but I am also going to impose a GPS

22   bracelet so that we can track his movements. His travel will

23   be restricted, I don’t know what district he -- oh, I can

24   probably figure that out here.

25              MS. GIWA:    It’s the Northern District of Texas is
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 22 of 26
 1                                                                   22

2    Dallas.

3               THE COURT:    Thank you.      His travel will be

4    restricted to the Northern District of Texas and then the

5    Southern and Eastern Districts of New York for purposes of

6    appearance, and any point in between for travel. But I want

7    him to be outfitted with a GPS bracelet. I don’t know if

8    that gets put on by SDNY or by Northern District of Texas,

9    can I ask Pretrial who’s on the line who would put that GPS

10   device on?

11              PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER:         Yes, Your Honor, it

12   is up to Your Honor if you would like the bracelet to

13   be affixed here in SDNY or for there to be a specific

14   condition stating that the defendant must rep ort to

15   Pretrial in the Northern District of Texas within 24

16   hours of his arrival.

17              THE COURT:      I think that makes sense. And so

18   what I’m going to do is say that he needs to report to

19   the Northern District of Texas within 72 hours of his

20   release from custody here in the Southern District of

21   New York.     So he’s to depart the Southern District of

22   New York upon the satisfaction of his parents, one

23   parent agreeing to serve as a third party custodian,

24   and posting the $200,000 bond cosigned by four

25   financially responsible people.             Once he’s been
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21   Page 23 of 26
 1                                                                   23

2    released, he needs to report within 72 hours to the

3    Pretrial Services officer in the Northern District of

4    Texas and be outfitted with a bracelet, which will

5    allow the Court to enforce his travel restrictions.

6               He is to surrender all identification

7    documents, passports but also any other identification

8    cards, and he is prohibited from making any new travel

9    or other identification cards.             He also may not open

10   any bank accounts and he, or new lines of credit

11   without prior approva l of his Pretrial Services

12   officer. He’s prohibited from having any contact with

13   this codefendants unless in the presence of counsel.

14   He is prohibited from using alcohol excessively.                     And

15   he is to work with his Pretrial Services officer in

16   his district of residence in order to seek or maintain

17   verifiable employment. And as I indicated, he is

18   directed to reside with is parents, that’s a condition

19   of this bail.

20              Sir, let me warn you that if you fail to

21   appear in court or if you violate any of the

22   conditions of your release, a warrant will be issued

23   for your arrest and you and anyone who cosigned the

24   bond will be responsible for paying its full amount,

25   and you may be charged with a separate crime of bail
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21    Page 24 of 26
 1                                                                    24

2    jumping. In addition, if you commit an offense while

3    you are released, you may be subject to a more severe

4    punishment than you would get if you committed the

5    same offense at any other time.

6                 All right, anything further from the

7    government?

8                 MS. MCLEOD:     Yes, Your Honor, the government

9    would, so Judge Engelmayer has set a pretrial

10   conference date of June 15 t h , so the government would

11   move to exclude time from today until June 15 t h in

12   order for the government to get and preparing and

13   producing discovery so that the defendant can begin

14   reviewing that discovery.

15                THE COURT:     Any objection from defense

16   counsel?

17                MS. GIWA:     No objection, Your Honor .

18                THE COURT:     Okay, I’ll exclude time until June

19   15 t h .   Anything further --

20                PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER:             Your Honor ?

21                THE COURT:     Yes?

22                PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER:             I’m sorry, t his is

23   Pretrial Services.         I just need a clarification

24   regarding the GPS bracelet, did you want a curfew

25   enforced by GPS so he’s also, his movements are being
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE   Document 24   Filed 05/25/21    Page 25 of 26
 1                                                                    25

2    monitored by the GPS technology?

3               THE COURT:      I was thinking it would just be to

4    make sure that he is staying in the Northern District

5    of Texas and I would want a blackout zone of airports

6    that within that district.

7               PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER:               Okay.

8               THE COURT:      But at this point I wasn’t going

9    to impose a curfew, I was going to have Pretrial

10   Services as directed. If there’s a reason that he

11   needs to be subject to a curfew, then that could be

12   imposed as appropriate.

13              PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER:               Okay.

14              THE COURT:      Does that make sense?

15              PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER:               Yes, that does,

16   Your Honor , thank you.

17              THE COURT:      Okay, great.        Anything further

18   from the government?

19              MS. MCLEOD:      No, Your Honor.

20              THE COURT:      Anything further from defense?

21              MS. GIWA:      Nothing further, thank you.

22              THE COURT:      Okay.    Thank you, everybody, we’re

23   adjourned.

24                    (Whereupon the matter is adjourned.)

25
 Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE    Document 24    Filed 05/25/21   Page 26 of 26
 1                                                                     26

2

3                            C E R T I F I C A T E

4

5                I, Carole Ludwig, certify that the foregoing

6    transcript of proceedings in the United States District

7    Court, Southern District of New York, United States of

8    America versus Amos Mundendi, Docket #21cr247, was prepared

9    using PC-based transcription software and is a true and

10   accurate record of the proceedings.

11

12

13   Signature       Carole Ludwig
14                        Carole Ludwig

15   Date:   May 14, 2021

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nysd.558852.24.0.pdf
Size
275,175 bytes
SHA-256
d621ca44a8c7897372dae06b6d84c70822a58a10f9ab8914b917d610060acadf
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nysd.558852.24.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top