Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-1) — In re January 2021 Short Squeeze (S.D. Fla., 2021-04-12)

Record facts

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · No. 1:21-md-02989-CMA · Doc. 103 · 2021-04-12 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE
TRADING LITIGATION
MDL No. 2989
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1)
On April 1, 2021, the Panel transferred 35 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2021). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been
transferred to the Southern District of Florida. With the consent of that court, all such actions have
been assigned to the Honorable Cecilia M. Altonaga.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Florida and assigned to
Judge Altonaga.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Southern District of Florida for the reasons stated in the order of April 1, 2021, and, with the consent
of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cecilia M. Altonaga.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
John W. Nichols
Clerk of the Panel
Case MDL No. 2989   Document 286   Filed 04/12/21   Page 1 of 3
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA   Document 103   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2021   Page 1 of 3
Apr 12, 2021

IN RE: JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE
TRADING LITIGATION
MDL No. 2989
SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS
DIST
DIV.
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
ARKANSAS EASTERN
ARE
4
21−00093
Kelley et al v. Robinhood Markets Inc et al
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
CAC
2
21−02230
Taylor Thompson v. Robinhood Financial LLC
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
3
21−00980
Daniluk v. Robinhood Financial, LLC et al
CAN
4
21−00871
Saliba v. Robinhood Markets, Inc. et al
CAN
4
21−00896
Clapp et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
CAN
4
21−01596
Lybrook et al v. Robinhood Financial LLC et al
CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN
CAS
3
21−00238
Petrosyan v. Robinhood Financial LLC et al
FLORIDA MIDDLE
FLM
8
21−00329
Zelewski et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc. et al
ILLINOIS NORTHERN
ILN
1
21−01601
Milhouse v. Robinhood Financial LLC et al
ILN
1
21−01643
Odeh v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. et al
MINNESOTA
MN
0
21−00415
Siruk et al v. Robinhood Financial LLC et al
MN
0
21−00689
Fox et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
NEBRASKA
NE
8
21−00093
Shaeffer v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.
Opposed 
4/9/21
Case MDL No. 2989   Document 286   Filed 04/12/21   Page 2 of 3
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA   Document 103   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2021   Page 2 of 3

NEW YORK EASTERN
NYE
1
21−00677
Dechirico et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
OREGON
OR
3
21−00319
Norvell et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Case MDL No. 2989   Document 286   Filed 04/12/21   Page 3 of 3
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA   Document 103   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2021   Page 3 of 3

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.103.0.pdf

Size

306,714 bytes

SHA-256

0c8ddea3dfb6b412c29c033e93467d8caafbabe04ea331cdbb14f75aa686d928

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.103.0.pdf

Original

archive.org