Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. David Staveley Sentencing Memorandum - United States v. David Staveley

Court filing

Sentencing Memorandum - United States v. David Staveley

Filed September 24, 2021 in Staveley; one of 64 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Filed2021-09-24

U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island · No. 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA · Doc. 48 · 2021-09-24 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
) 
)   Criminal No. 20-074-MSM 
v. 
) 
) 
DAVID STAVELEY 
) 
Defendant. 
) 
 GOVERNMENT’S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM 
Defendant David Staveley (“Staveley”) is due to be sentenced on September 30, 2021 on 
one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and one count 
of failure to appear in court, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146(a)(1). Staveley was among the first 
in the country (and the first one charged) who decided to take advantage of the national crisis 
brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic by devising a scheme to defraud the Paycheck 
Protection Program (“PPP”). Along with his co-conspirator David Butziger (“Butziger”), 
Staveley brazenly sought to defraud the PPP by submitting fraudulent applications for $543,959 
in forgivable loans for restaurants that were not in business and, in one instance, for which he 
had no ownership interest.  
Staveley then compounded his criminal conduct by removing his electronic bracelet, 
staging his own suicide and leading the U.S. Marshals on a three-month hunt for his 
whereabouts. Staveley was ultimately apprehended in Georgia with false identification 
documents in his possession.    
These offenses are just the latest in the string of crimes committed by Staveley, including 
two prior federal fraud convictions in the District of New Hampshire. Due to the seriousness of 
the offenses, the need to protect the public and to afford adequate deterrence, the United States 
Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA   Document 48   Filed 09/24/21   Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 270

2 
recommends that the Court impose a sentence of 56 months imprisonment, which is the middle 
of the applicable guideline range.1 
Seriousness of the Offense 
The first sentencing factor the Court must consider under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 is the 
seriousness of the offense. There can be no question that the offenses committed by Staveley 
were extremely serious. With the country reeling from the COVID-19 pandemic and the 
shutdown of businesses nationwide, Staveley simply saw an opportunity to benefit himself by 
committing more fraud.  First, on April 6, 2020, Staveley, in the name of his brother and without 
his brother’s knowledge or authorization, submitted a loan application under the PPP to 
BankNewport on behalf of Oakland Beach Restaurant Group LLC, d/b/a “Top of the Bay.” The 
loan application was in the amount of $185,750 and fraudulently represented that Oakland Beach 
Restaurant Group, LLC had 26 employees and an average monthly payroll of $53,000 at the Top 
of the Bay restaurant in Warwick, R.I.  In reality, Staveley did not own this restaurant and had no 
employees and no payroll. In furtherance of this loan application, Staveley submitted fraudulent 
tax return documents to BankNewport that were created by his co-conspirator, Butziger.  
On that same day, April 6, 2020, Staveley, again in the name of his brother, submitted a 
loan application under the PPP to BankNewport on behalf of Apponaug Restaurant Group LLC, 
d/b/a “Remington House.” The loan application was in the amount of $144,050 and fraudulently 
represented that Apponaug Restaurant Group, LLC had 18 employees and an average monthly 
payroll of $46,000. In reality, the Remington House restaurant in Warwick, R.I. had been closed 
1 The United States agrees that defendant should receive a 3-level reduction for 
acceptance of responsibility. If these three levels are applied, defendant’s final guideline 
calculation with be a Level 20, CHC IV, producing a guideline range of 51-63 months 
imprisonment. 
Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA   Document 48   Filed 09/24/21   Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 271

3 
since November 2018 and Apponaug Restaurant Group, LLC had no employees. In furtherance 
of this loan application, Staveley submitted fraudulent tax return documents to BankNewport 
that were created by his co-conspirator, Butziger.  
Also on April 6, 2020, Staveley, in the name of his brother, submitted a loan application 
under the PPP to BankNewport on behalf of New Flat Penny LLC, d/b/a “On The Trax,” a 
restaurant in Berlin, MA.  The loan application was in the amount of $108,777.50 and 
fraudulently represented that New Flat Penny, LLC had 22 employees and an average monthly 
payroll of $36,000. In reality, although New Flat Penny did own and operate the On the Trax 
restaurant in 2019 and the beginning of 2020, the On The Trax restaurant was closed 
permanently on about March 10, 2020 after its liquor license was revoked. New Flat Penny, LLC 
had no employees when the PPP application was submitted.   
Finally, on April 6, 2020, co-conspirator Butziger submitted a loan application under the 
PPP to BankNewport in his own name on behalf of an unincorporated entity that he called Dock 
Wireless. The loan application was in the amount of $105,381.50 and fraudulently represented 
that Dock Wireless had 7 employees and an average monthly payroll of $42,152.60. In reality, 
Dock Wireless had no employees and no wages were ever paid by Dock Wireless.  
In total, Staveley and Butziger submitted four fraudulent PPP loans applications totaling 
$543,959. While the applications were pending, a concerned citizen aware of their fraudulent 
nature brought them to the attention of law enforcement which ultimately led to their denial by 
BankNewport. Though Staveley was ultimately thwarted in his attempt to obtain PPP funds, 
there can be no question that his intention, at the very beginning of the pandemic, was to exploit 
the national crisis for his own advantage. The seriousness of the offense obviously includes the 
large amount of attempted fraud perpetrated by this defendant. In this case, however, there is an 
Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA   Document 48   Filed 09/24/21   Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 272

4 
 
even greater harm. The money that defendant attempted to obtain by fraud was meant for 
legitimate small businesses struggling to survive after being forced to shut down due to the 
pandemic. It was meant to pay actual employees so that these employees could keep receiving 
some income when they were unable to work. This money set aside by the Government in the 
PPP program was not endless. In fact, many businesses struggled to obtain funding under this 
program due to the intense need created by the closure of much of the economy. None of this 
mattered to this defendant. He saw the economic emergency created by the pandemic simply as 
an opportunity to make himself rich by taking for himself what was meant for those in need.  
 
Defendant exacerbated his criminal conduct after his arrest when he removed the 
electronic monitoring device from his body and fled. In an effort to deceive law enforcement into 
believing that he had died, Staveley staged his suicide on May 26, 2020, by, among other things, 
leaving suicide notes with family members (including his 80-year-old mother) and associates and 
in his car, which he left unlocked and parked by the Atlantic Ocean. Law enforcement sent a 
search and rescue boat into the nearby ocean in an attempt to locate Staveley’s body, to no avail. 
Many of his family members and associates were left with the belief that Staveley had indeed 
killed himself, though the ones who knew him best informed law enforcement that they 
suspected this to be yet another scheme orchestrated by the defendant. 
 
During the next three months, in an effort to avoid apprehension, Staveley traveled to 
various States using false identities and stolen license plates. The United States Marshals worked 
tirelessly on tracking him down even during the period in which there was uncertainty as to 
whether Staveley had indeed committed suicide. During this period, Staveley changed his phone 
number on at least five occasions. Ultimately, Staveley was apprehended by the United States 
Marshals Service in Alpharetta, Georgia on July 23, 2020. Staveley was found to be in 
Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA   Document 48   Filed 09/24/21   Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 273

5 
 
possession of multiple false identification documents that he had used throughout the period of 
his flight.  
 
The seriousness of the offenses committed by Staveley calls for a very heavy sentence. 
 
   Protection of the Public 
The next pertinent factor under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 is the need to protect the public. Put 
simply, the public needs to be protected from this defendant. Long before Staveley decided to 
defraud the Paycheck Protection Program, he committed serious financial crimes. In 2009, 
Staveley received his first federal conviction, a conviction for Wire Fraud out of the District of 
New Hampshire. This conviction involved defendant submitting $280,000 in false invoices from 
fictitious companies for services that were purportedly rendered in the construction of a baseball 
park. Defendant received a sentence of 30 months of imprisonment. After defendant completed 
this sentence, he violated his supervised release and was sentenced to an additional 3 months’ 
imprisonment for Violation of a Trespass Order. 
Defendant’s second federal conviction took place in 2015, when he was again convicted 
of Wire Fraud in the District of New Hampshire. This offense involved a complicated mortgage 
fraud and bank fraud scheme that defendant orchestrated in 2003-2005. Defendant was sentenced 
to 27 months of imprisonment for this offense.  
Defendant was also convicted in 2015 in Rhode Island of Willful Trespass. According to 
information provided by the East Greenwich Police Department, defendant engaged in dangerous 
stalking behavior of a former girlfriend, including entering her home uninvited, changing the 
locks in her home, hiding in the shrubs outside her place of employment and following the 
victim. (PSR ¶ 53) The victim obtained a restraining order and claimed that the defendant, in 
Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA   Document 48   Filed 09/24/21   Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 274

6 
 
addition to breaking into her house, sent her harassing texts, emails and voice mails, hacked her 
private messages and her bank account and made homicidal threats. 
These prior arrests and convictions did nothing to stop the defendant from committing 
further crimes. This defendant has shown that he will continue to find ways to defraud others. 
The public needs to be protected from him. 
Need to Afford Adequate Deterrence 
 As with most federal criminal cases, there exists a strong need for deterrence. White-
collar defendants who commit fraud are by and large rational actors who weigh the pros and cons 
of their criminal conduct before undertaking it. Giving a heavy sentence to a defendant like 
Staveley who has made a career out of defrauding others would send a powerful message. It 
would also send the important message that significant punishment is to follow for anyone who 
attempts to capitalize on national emergencies by committing fraud.  
There is also a strong need for individual deterrence in this case. The sentences defendant 
received in his prior federal fraud cases – 30 and 27 months, respectively – obviously did not 
deter defendant from committing more fraud. When the coronavirus crisis hit this country, he 
saw only the opportunity to benefit himself by submitting fraudulent PPP loans in his brother’s 
name. A significant sentence – well above those defendant received in his prior cases – is 
necessary for there to be any hope of deterring Staveley from committing additional fraud.   
Personal Characteristics of the Defendant 
The defendant reported to Probation Department that he was a victim of trauma and that 
he suffers from mental health issues as a result. The United States has no knowledge of the facts 
Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA   Document 48   Filed 09/24/21   Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 275

7 
underlying defendant’s professed trauma but takes defendant at his word that he suffers from 
mental health disorders.  
One fact that is painfully clear from the Presentence Report is that defendant still blames 
others for his own independent decisions to commit crimes. When explaining why he committed 
the instant offense of defrauding the Paycheck Protection Program, defendant told Probation that 
he did so because he was in a bad relationship at the time and was experiencing trauma. (PSR ¶ 
78) The Government does not comprehend how a difficult relationship can be to blame for
defendant’s own decision so submit hundreds of thousands of dollars in fraudulent loan 
applications. 
Defendant then attempts to explain away his decision to cut off his bracelet and flee by 
blaming his co-conspirator Butziger. Defendant claims that Butziger told him to remove his 
electronic monitoring equipment and to drive south. (PSR ¶ 80). According to defendant, he was 
“blacking out and never got to his destination” until he was found by the Marshals in Georgia. 
Id. Defendant neglects to mention how he staged his own suicide, sent suicide notes to friends 
and family members, changed his phone regularly and used numerous false identities to elude 
capture. 
Defendant simply seems incapable of taking full responsibility for his own choices in life. 
No one forced him to defraud the government in the midst of a national crisis. No one forced him 
to stage his own suicide and abscond. He committed these acts voluntarily and willfully. Until 
defendant accepts his own responsibility for his conduct, there is little to no chance of him 
refraining from criminal behavior in the future.     
Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA   Document 48   Filed 09/24/21   Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 276

8 
For all of the foregoing reasons, a sentence of 56 months of imprisonment is sufficient, 
but not greater than necessary, to punish the defendant, promote respect for the law, protect the 
public, and afford adequate deterrence.  
Respectfully submitted,  
RICHARD B. MYRUS 
ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
___________________________ 
LEE H. VILKER 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA   Document 48   Filed 09/24/21   Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 277

9 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
 
I hereby certify that on this 24th day of September 2021, I caused the within 
Government’s Sentencing Memorandum to be filed electronically and it is available for viewing 
and downloading from the ECF system. 
 
 
/s/ Lee H. Vilker________________  
 
LEE H. VILKER 
Assistant U. S. Attorney,  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U. S. Attorney's Office 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
50 Kennedy Plaza, 8th Floor 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Providence, RI 02903 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
401-709-5000, 401-709-5001 (fax) 
 
 
Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA   Document 48   Filed 09/24/21   Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 278

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.rid.49679.48.0.pdf
Size
157,623 bytes
SHA-256
d62feb70e90bd5337cfd896d37f50d5bea08f5af1d1e22f03c71b15c551da190
Our copy
gov.uscourts.rid.49679.48.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top