Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Roody Metelus — S.D. Fla., No. 0:26-cr-60019-RKA Government's Response to the Standing Discovery Order

Court filing

Government's Response to the Standing Discovery Order

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filed2026-02-20

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 0:26-cr-60019-RKA · Doc. 14 · 2026-02-20 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

The government's response to the Standing Discovery Order in United States v. Roody Metelus, No. 0:26-cr-60019-RKA, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered February 20, 2026 as Document 14. Filed under Local Rule 88.10 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, it states the government is unaware of written or oral statements by the defendant and that the defendant did not testify before the Grand Jury. It lists the materials produced, including First United Bank loan files, Liberty Tax records, IRS records, bank subpoena responses and PPP records from Sunshine State Economic Development. It demands reciprocal discovery under Rule 16(b) and commits to Brady, Giglio and F.R.E. 404(b) disclosures. Assistant United States Attorney Aimee C. Jimenez signs, certifying the discovery was sent to defense counsel David Tarras on February 19, 2026.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

1 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 
CASE NO. 26-CR-60019-ALTMAN/STRAUSS 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
vs. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROODY METELUS, 
 
 
 
  
 
 
Defendant. 
 
 
 
_________________________________/ 
 
GOVERNMENT=S RESPONSE TO THE   
STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER  
 
The United States hereby files this response to the Standing Discovery Order.  This 
response also complies with Local Rule 88.10 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, and is 
numbered to correspond with Local Rule 88.10. 
A. 
 
1. 
The government is unaware of any written or recorded statements made by the 
defendant.  
 
2. 
The government is unaware of any oral statements made by the defendant before 
or after arrest in response to interrogation by any person then known to the 
defendant to be a government agent that the government intends to use at trial.   
 
3. 
The defendant did not testify before the Grand Jury. 
 
4. 
The NCIC records check of the defendant is attached.  
 
5. 
Books, papers, documents, photographs, tangible objects, buildings or places which 
the government intends to use as evidence at trial to prove its case in chief, or were 
obtained or belonging to the defendants are attached to this discovery response and 
are identified below.  
 
 
First United Bank loan files 
 
Abrigo-Sageworks copies of loan files 
 
Liberty Tax records for customers of the defendant 
Case 0:26-cr-60019-RKA   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2026   Page 1 of 4

 
 
2 
 
Liberty Tax records reflecting activity on Liberty Tax systems 
 
IRS records 
 
Bank subpoena responses 
 
PPP Records from Sunshine State Economic Development 
 
Reports of interviews and affidavits  
 
State of Florida, Department of Corporations records 
 
NCIC report for the defendant. 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
6. 
There were no physical or mental examinations or scientific tests or experiments 
made in connection with this case.     
 
B. 
DEMAND FOR RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY: The United States requests the 
disclosure and production of materials enumerated as items 1, 2 and 3 of Section B 
of the Standing Discovery Order.  This request is also made pursuant to Rule 16(b) 
of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 
 
 
 
The government specifically requests the production of any records or evidence 
the defendant intends to use at trial in this case.  
 
C. 
The government will disclose any information or material which may be favorable on the 
issues of guilt or punishment within the scope of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), 
and United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). 
 
D. 
The government will disclose any payments, promises of immunity, leniency, preferential 
treatment, or other inducements made to prospective government witnesses, within the 
scope of Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), or Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 
(1959). 
 
E. 
The government will disclose any prior convictions of any alleged co-conspirator, 
accomplice or informant who will testify for the government at trial. 
 
F. 
The defendant was the subject of an identification procedure involving a photo array 
shown to some of the persons interviewed.     
 
G. 
The government has advised its agents and officers involved in this case to preserve all 
rough notes. 
 
H. 
The government will timely advise the defendant of its intent, if any, to introduce during 
its case in chief proof of evidence pursuant to F.R.E. 404(b).  You are hereby on notice 
that all evidence made available to you for inspection, as well as all statements disclosed 
herein or in any future discovery letter, may be offered in the trial of this cause, under 
F.R.E. 404(b) or otherwise (including the inextricably-intertwined doctrine).   
 
  
 
Case 0:26-cr-60019-RKA   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2026   Page 2 of 4

 
 
3 
I. 
The defendant is not an aggrieved persons, as defined in Title 18, United States Code, 
Section 2510(11), of electronic surveillance. 
 
J. 
The government has ordered the Grand Jury testimony of all witnesses who will testify 
for the government at the trial of this cause. 
 
K. 
The government will, upon defense request, deliver to any laboratory presently registered 
with the Attorney General in compliance with 21 U.S.C. ' 822 and ' 823 and 21 C.F.R. 
1301.13, a sufficient representative sample of any alleged contraband which is the subject 
of this indictment to allow independent chemical analysis of such sample.  
 
If there is no response within ten (10) days from the date of the Certificate of Service 
attached hereto, the bulk of the narcotics will be destroyed.  As usual, random samples 
will be set aside to be used as evidence at trial. 
 
L. 
The government does not know of any automobile, vessel, or aircraft allegedly used in 
the commission of this offense that is in the government’s possession. 
 
M. 
To date, the government is not aware of any latent fingerprints or palm prints which have 
been identified by a government expert as those of the defendant.   
 
N. 
To date, the government has not received a request for disclosure of the subject matter of 
expert testimony that the government reasonably expects to offer at trial. 
 
O. 
The government will make every possible effort in good faith to stipulate to all facts or 
points of law the truth and existence of which is not contested and the early resolution of 
which will expedite trial.  These stipulations will be discussed at the discovery conference. 
 
P. 
At a discovery conference to be scheduled pursuant to Section A.5, above, the 
government will seek written stipulations to agreed facts in this case, to be signed by the 
defendant and defense counsel. 
 
The government is aware of its continuing duty to disclose such newly discovered 
additional information required by the Standing Discovery Order, Rule 16(c) of the Federal 
Rules of Criminal Procedure, Brady, Giglio, Napue, and the obligation to assure a fair trial. 
 
 
Sent via USAFX are records with bate-stamp range: 
  
Discovery01_000001 through 016693. 
 
 
Case 0:26-cr-60019-RKA   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2026   Page 3 of 4

 
 
4 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
 
 
 
JASON A. REDING QUIÑONES 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
 
By:  
s/Aimee Jimenez 
 
 
Aimee C. Jimenez 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Court No. A5500795 
99 Northeast 4th Street 
Miami, Florida 33132-2111 
Tel: (305) 961-9028 
Email: aimee.jimenez@usdoj.gov  
 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 20, 2026, I electronically filed the foregoing 
document, Government=s Response to the Standing Discovery Order (without attachments), with 
the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF.  A copy of the documents identified in this discovery 
response were sent via the USAFX portal on February 19, 2026, to counsel for the defendant, 
David Tarras, Esq., at david@tarrasdefense.com.    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
s/Aimee Jimenez                           
Aimee C. Jimenez 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
Case 0:26-cr-60019-RKA   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2026   Page 4 of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.705759.14.0.pdf
Size
153,863 bytes
SHA-256
a87cdccc3272d8034151fb089f214b4139e6f5f28f0a4c642eaa0750bdb0c2d3
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.705759.14.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top