Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Metelus

Case docket

United States v. Roody Metelus — S.D. Fla., No. 0:26-cr-60019-RKA

United States v. Metelus — 10 court filings in the archive from U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, filed between February 5, 2026 and April 10, 2026. Among them: 1 information, 1 waiver and 1 motion.

See also: United States v. Roody Metelus — U.S. District Court, S.D. Fla. — the same docket (docket No. 0:26-cr-60019) under another case page, 4 public filings.

Current status: see United States v. Roody Metelus — U.S. District Court, S.D. Fla..

Case facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filings10 public filings
Filed2026-02-05 – 2026-04-10
Document typesinformation (1), waiver (1), motion (1), proposed order (1), order (1)
Original PDFs10 of 10

Case summary

Roody Metelus is charged in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 0:26-cr-60019-RKA. At an initial appearance on an information on February 5, 2026 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss he was advised of the charges, waived indictment and signed a waiver, waived reading of the information, entered a plea of not guilty and demanded a jury trial; bond was set at $150,000 personal surety and he was released in court. The minutes record the violation as 18 U.S.C. § 371. A government motion states that he is charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud arising from the preparation and submission of more than 200 false and fraudulent Paycheck Protection Program loan applications with false supporting tax documents. The case is pending; the charges are allegations.

Case at a glance

Defendant(s)Roody Metelus
Court and docketU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 0:26-cr-60019-RKA, captioned on the parties' filings as 26-CR-60019-ALTMAN and 26-CR-60019-ALTMAN/STRAUSS; the initial appearance was before U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss
ProgramPaycheck Protection Program (PPP). The government's unopposed motion for a protective order states that the charge stems from the preparation and submission of more than 200 false and fraudulent PPP loan applications with false and fraudulent supporting tax documents
ChargesConspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, as stated in the government's unopposed motion for a protective order; the initial-appearance minutes record the violation as "18:U.S.C.§371". He waived indictment and consented to prosecution by information on February 5, 2026. The information itself is not on this page
Disposition or statusPending. A plea of not guilty was entered at the initial appearance on February 5, 2026, a jury trial was demanded and the defendant was released on a $150,000 personal surety bond with all standard conditions. A trial order of February 10, 2026 set the case for a criminal jury trial in the two-week period beginning March 9, 2026, with a calendar call on March 3, 2026. A protective order governing disclosure of sensitive information was entered on February 11, 2026. The defendant's waiver of speedy trial filed April 10, 2026 states that on April 8, 2026 the court granted the parties' request to set the matter before U.S. Magistrate Judge Yeney Hernandez for a change of plea, and waives speedy trial from April 20, 2026 through a plea hearing set for April 27, 2026 and through sentencing. No plea, judgment or sentence is on this page. The case is pending as of September 16, 2026; the charges are allegations

What is he charged with?

The government's unopposed motion for a protective order of February 9, 2026 states that the defendant is charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud stemming from the preparation and submission of more than 200 false and fraudulent Paycheck Protection Program loan applications with false and fraudulent supporting tax documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The initial-appearance minutes of February 5, 2026 record the violation as 18 U.S.C. § 371. The information is not on this page, so the counts cannot be stated.

What happened at the initial appearance?

The court order and minutes for February 5, 2026 record that the defendant was present with counsel and advised of the charges, that the court granted a joint oral motion and set bond at $150,000 personal surety with all standard conditions, that he waived indictment and signed a waiver, that reading of the information was waived and a plea of not guilty entered, that a jury trial was demanded and a standing discovery order requested, that the court granted an oral motion for entry of that order, that a Brady order was entered the same day, and that the defendant was released in court.

What is the status of the case?

The defendant's waiver of speedy trial, filed April 10, 2026, states that on April 8, 2026 the court granted the parties' request to set the matter before U.S. Magistrate Judge Yeney Hernandez for a change of plea, and waives speedy trial from April 20, 2026 through the plea hearing set for April 27, 2026 and through the remainder of the proceedings to sentencing. No filing later than April 10, 2026 is on this page, and no plea or judgment appears among its filings.

Summary written from the documents on this page; every sentence is sourced.

Filings

10 public filings from this case, in filing-date order.

  1. Court Order/Minutes — Initial Appearance on an Information — United States v. Metelus (S.D. Fla.)Information · PDF
  2. WAIVER OF INDICTMENT by Roody MetelusWaiver · PDF
  3. $150,000 PSB Bond Entered as to Roody Metelus Approved — United States v. Metelus (Dkt. 8, S.D. Fla.)PDF
  4. Notice of Permanent Appearance as Counsel of RecordNotice · PDF
  5. Unopposed Motion for Protective Order by USA — United States v. Metelus (Dkt. 11, S.D. Fla.)Motion · PDF
  6. Text of Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 11.1 · PDF
  7. Trial Order as to Roody Metelus: In Limine Motions due — United States v. Metelus (Dkt. 12, S.D. Fla.)PDF
  8. Protective Order Governing Disclosure of Sensitive Information — United States v. Metelus (Dkt. 13, S.D. Fla.)Order · PDF
  9. Government's Response to the Standing Discovery OrderResponse or reply · PDF
  10. Defendant's Waiver of Speedy Trial — United States v. Metelus (S.D. Fla.)PDF

Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.

Back to top