Court filing
Proposed Order — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 88-2, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)
Filed September 18, 2020 in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation; one of 174 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2020-09-18 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 88-2 · 2020-09-18 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAID INC.’S ADMIN. MOTION TO CONTINUE CMC CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION IN RE PLAID INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION _____________________________________ THIS DOCUMENTS RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS Case No.: 4:20-cv-03056-DMR [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT PLAID INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 88-2 Filed 09/18/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAID INC.’S ADMIN. MOTION TO CONTINUE CMC CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR Before the Court is Defendant Plaid Inc.’s Administrative Motion to Continue Case Management Conference. The Court has considered the papers, including Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Administrative Motion to Continue Case Management Conference and the Declaration of Shawn M. Kennedy, and hereby DENIES the motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________ Hon. Donna M. Ryu Federal Magistrate Judge Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 88-2 Filed 09/18/20 Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.359040.88.2.pdf
- Size
- 22,720 bytes
- SHA-256
- a4e2a582b3d7e7be6610a1bcfaa16884df8d98ecf0e6d6e6990c59b783563f68
- Original
- PACER (login required)