Court filing
Proposed Order — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 95.1)
Summary
A proposed order, Document 95-1 filed October 9, 2020, in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation, Master Docket No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Oakland Division, before the Hon. Donna M. Ryu. The proposed order is captioned as granting a joint stipulation modifying the briefing schedule for the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' consolidated amended complaint. It would provide that plaintiffs' opposition to Plaid's motion to dismiss is due November 17, 2020, and that the defendant's reply in support of the motion is due December 11, 2020.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Proposed Order — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 95.1).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, Doc. 95-1. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/plaid-privacy-cand-359040/undated-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-95-1-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-95-1/
, SHA-256 ba22fcfcec93e97f46250a5972979ee15fa2d67e5d9c1cb25703a633fe896e1e.Full text
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 95-1 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12 IN RE PLAID INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION Master Docket No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR
13
______________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT
14 STIPULATION MODIFYING BRIEFING
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION
15 TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’
ALL ACTIONS CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
16
17 Hon. Donna M. Ryu
18 Action Filed: May 4, 2020
19 Trial Date: None Set
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS – MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 95-1 Filed 10/09/20 Page 2 of 2
1 This matter is before the Court pursuant to the parties’ stipulation to modify the briefing
2 schedule for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint. Based on
3 the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4 1. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Plaid’s Motion to Dismiss is due November 17, 2020.
5 2. Defendant’s Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss is due December 11, 2020.
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 Dated:
The Honorable Donna M. Ryu
8 United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn & 1
Crutcher LLP
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS – MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.359040.95.1.pdf
- Size
- 151,157 bytes
- SHA-256
- ba22fcfcec93e97f46250a5972979ee15fa2d67e5d9c1cb25703a633fe896e1e
- Original
- PACER (login required)