Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 84 Rhea Ghosh's Motion — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 86, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 86 · 2020-09-15 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No: _______________ 
APPLICATION FOR 
ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 
PRO HAC VICE 
(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)
I,   
 
, an active member in good standing of the bar of 
, hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 
Northern District of California representing:  
 
 
 
 
 
 in the 
above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 
attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 
within the State of California. 
MY ADDRESS OF RECORD:
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 
MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD:
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 
MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 
I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 
another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is:   
. 
A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 
bar is attached to this application. 
I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 
Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 
Dated: 
APPLICANT 
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 
 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of 
 is granted, 
subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 
appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 
designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 
Dated: 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE October 
2012 
DW%.3
Reset Form
IN RE PLAID INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION
Rhea Ghosh
Rhea Ghosh
Rhea Ghosh
New York Supreme Court
Plaintiffs
Michael W. Sobol
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013-1413
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
(212) 355-9500
(415) 956-1000
rghosh@lchb.com
msobol@lchb.com
5517701
09/15/20
9/16/2020
DONNA M. RYU  
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 86     Filed 09/16/20     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.86.0.pdf

Size

98,239 bytes

SHA-256

3038dae7e0c557357a12571579ce83c3f4b507a6cfae8c4747c5be1e7ce92a26

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.86.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)