Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation — N.D. Cal., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by Plaid Inc., James Cottle, Fre…

Court filing

STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by Plaid Inc., James Cottle, Frederick… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 35)

Summary

Stipulation and proposed order extending time to respond to the complaint and setting a briefing schedule in James Cottle, et al. v. Plaid Inc., Case No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division (Doc. 35, dated May 26, 2020). It recites that the complaint was filed May 4, 2020 and that Plaid Inc.'s response was due May 27, 2020. The parties stipulate under Civil Local Rule 6-1 that Plaid Inc. will respond on or before July 22, 2020, plaintiffs may oppose any responsive pleading motion on or before September 23, 2020, and Plaid Inc. may reply on or before October 14, 2020. It carries /s/ signatures for Ethan D. Dettmer and Shawn M. Kennedy, and a proposed order for Hon. Donna M. Ryu with blank date lines.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2020-05-04

Cite this document

“STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by Plaid Inc., James Cottle, Frederick… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 35).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, Doc. 35, filed 2020-05-04. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-plaid-privacy-cand-359040/2020-05-04-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-35-0-doc-35/, SHA-256 c86ae58568685c8a7821692c9982aeffdc2da0e62ebb32ec3b5785e6cfcd4071.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP  
ETHAN D. DETTMER, SBN 196046  
edettmer@gibsondunn.com 
ABIGAIL A. BARRERA, SBN 301746 
abarrera@gibsondunn.com 
ASHLEY J. HODGE, SBN 287653 
ahodge@gibsondunn.com 
ANTHONY D. BEDEL, SBN 324065 
tbedel@gibsondunn.com 
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 
San Francisco, CA 94105 
Telephone: 415.393.8200 
Facsimile: 415.393.8306 
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 
ALEXANDER H. SOUTHWELL (pro hac vice) 
asouthwell@gibsondunn.com 
200 Park Avenue, 48th Floor 
New York, NY 10166 
Telephone: 212.351.4000 
Facsimile: 212.351.4035 
Attorneys for Defendant PLAID INC. 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
OAKLAND DIVISION 
JAMES COTTLE, et al., 
Plaintiffs, 
v. 
PLAID INC., 
Defendant. 
CASE NO. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 
COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING 
SCHEDULE 
Hon. Donna M. Ryu 
 
 
Action Filed: 
May 4, 2020 
Trial Date: 
None Set 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 35   Filed 05/26/20   Page 1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
1 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
Defendant Plaid Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs James Cottle and Frederick Schoeneman, 
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”) by and through their counsel of 
record, hereby stipulate as follows: 
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a Complaint on May 4, 2020, see Dkt. 
No. 1; 
WHEREAS, the Complaint asserts ten separate causes of action against Defendant Plaid Inc. 
and includes factual and legal allegations predicated on conduct that is claimed to go back to 2013; 
WHEREAS, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related governmental orders have 
impacted, among many other things, ongoing business and litigation activities, including delaying 
typical briefing schedules; 
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served Defendant with the Complaint on May 6, 2020 and Defendant’s 
answer or other response to the Complaint is currently due on May 27, 2020, see Dkt. No. 26; 
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendant consented to have Magistrate Judge Ryu conduct all 
further proceedings in this case on May 6, 2020 and May 26, 2020, respectively, see Dkt. Nos. 15 & 
34; 
WHEREAS, this extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already 
fixed by Court order; 
WHEREAS, no previous time modifications have been made in the case, whether by 
stipulation or Court order; 
WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) provides that “[p]arties may stipulate in writing, without 
a Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, or to 
enlarge or shorten the time in matters not required to be filed or lodged with the Court, provided the 
change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order”; and  
WHEREAS, this stipulation is not intended to operate as an admission of any factual 
allegation or legal conclusion and is submitted subject to and without waiver of any right, defense, 
affirmative defense, or objection, including lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal 
jurisdiction, or improper venue, except that Defendant expressly waives any defect concerning 
insufficient process or insufficient service of process; 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 35   Filed 05/26/20   Page 2 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
2 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the 
undersigned counsel for the parties in this action, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1 that: 
• Defendant will file its responsive pleading or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ 
Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) on or before July 22, 2020. 
• Plaintiffs may file an opposition to any responsive pleading motion on or before 
September 23, 2020. 
• Defendant may file a reply brief in support of any such pleading motion on or 
before October 14, 2020. 
• The Court will hear argument at the soonest time available thereafter, based on the 
Court’s availability. 
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the 
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory, below. 
 
 
Dated:  May 26, 2020 
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 
By:                       /s/ Ethan D. Dettmer 
 
Ethan D. Dettmer (SBN 196046) 
Abigail A. Barrera (SBN 301746) 
Ashley J. Hodge (SBN 287653) 
Anthony D. Bedel (SBN 324065) 
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 
Telephone: 415.393.8200 
Fax: 415.393.8306 
abarrera@gibsondunn.com 
ahodge@gibsondunn.com 
tbedel@gibsondunn.com 
 
Alexander H. Southwell (pro hac vice) 
200 Park Avenue, 48th Floor 
New York, NY 10166 
Telephone: 212.351.4000 
Fax: 212.351.4035 
asouthwell@gibsondunn.com 
 
Attorneys for Defendant Plaid Inc. 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 35   Filed 05/26/20   Page 3 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
3 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
Dated: May 26, 2020  
 
 
By: 
                     /s/ Shawn M. Kennedy  
 
Shawn M. Kennedy (SBN 218472) 
Andrew M. Purdy (SBN 261912) 
Bret D. Hembd (SBN 272826) 
HERRERA PURDY LLP 
4590 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 500 
Newport Beach, CA 92660 
Telephone: (949) 936-0900 
Fax: (855) 969-2050 
skennedy@herrerapurdy.com 
apurdy@herrerapurdy.com 
bhembd@herrerapurdy.com 
 
Nicomedes Sy Herrera (SBN 275332) 
Laura E. Seidl (SBN 269891) 
HERRERA PURDY LLP 
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600 
Oakland, CA 94612 
Telephone: (510) 422-4700 
Fax: (855) 969-2050 
nherrera@herrerapurdy.com 
lseidl@herrerapurdy.com 
 
 
Rachel Geman (pro hac vice) 
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 
BERNSTEIN, LLP 
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor 
New York, NY 10013-1413 
Telephone: (212) 355-9500 
Fax: (212) 355-9592 
rgeman@lchb.com 
 
Michael W. Sobol (SBN 194857) 
Melissa Gardner (SBN 289096) 
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 
BERNSTEIN, LLP 
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 
Telephone: (415) 956-1000 
Fax: (415) 956-1008 
msobol@lchb.commgardner@lchb.com 
 
Warren T. Burns (pro hac vice) 
Russell Herman (pro hac vice) 
BURNS CHAREST LLP 
900 Jackson Street, Suite 500 
Dallas, TX 75202 
Telephone: (469) 904-4550 
Fax: (469) 444-5002 
wburns@burnscharest.com 
rherman@burnscharest.com 
 
Christopher J. Cormier (pro hac vice) 
BURNS CHAREST LLP 
5290 Denver Tech Center Parkway, Suite 150 
Greenwood Village, CO 80111 
Telephone: (720) 630-2092 
Fax: (469) 444-5002 
ccormier@burnscharest.com  
 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Classes 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 35   Filed 05/26/20   Page 4 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
4 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
[PROPOSED] ORDER 
Having reviewed the above Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to 
Complaint and Setting Briefing Schedule, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 
that the following schedule shall govern this matter: 
• Defendant will file its responsive pleading or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ 
Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) on or before July 22, 2020. 
• Plaintiffs may file an opposition to any such pleading motion on or before 
September 23, 2020. 
• Defendant may file a reply brief in support of any such pleading motion on or 
before October 14, 2020. 
• The Court will hear argument on the motion on _________, at __________. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
DATED:  ____________, 2020 
_______________________________________ 
THE HONORABLE DONNA M. RYU 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 35   Filed 05/26/20   Page 5 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
5 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I, Ethan D. Dettmer, hereby certify that on May 26, 2020, I caused the foregoing Stipulation 
and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint and Setting Briefing Schedule to be 
electronically filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system.  Notice of this filing will be served to all counsel 
of record by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. 
 
              /s/ Ethan D. Dettmer  
  
Ethan D. Dettmer                    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 35   Filed 05/26/20   Page 6 of 6

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.35.0.pdf
Size
48,132 bytes
SHA-256
c86ae58568685c8a7821692c9982aeffdc2da0e62ebb32ec3b5785e6cfcd4071
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.35.0.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top